单选题 This weekend marks 25 years since the publication of the U.S. Department of Education's explosive report "A Nation at Risk. " Its powerful indictment of American education launched the largest education-reform movement in the nation's history, paving the way for strategies as different as charter schools and the federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act. But even after a vast political and financial investment spanning two and a half decades, we're far from achieving the report's ambitious aims.
We've learned a lot about school reform in 25 years, lessons that suggest that it is possible, eventually, to achieve "A Nation at Risk's" ambitious aims. We've learned that a lot of public schools require incentives to lift their sights for their students. The nation's long tradition of letting local school boards set standards isn't going to get us where we need to go educationally. If anything, NCLB's requirement of statewide standards needs to be taken to its logical conclusion—rigorous national standards. Make them voluntary. Give states and school systems different ways of measuring their progress against the standards by sanctioning a number of different national examination boards. And reward educators for meeting the new standards (NCLB only punishes schools for not meeting state standards, which encourages states to keep standards low because they don't want a lot of their schools labeled as failures).
But improvement can't merely be imposed on schools from the outside. Schools are complex social enterprises; their success depends on thousands of daily personal interactions. They are, in the end, only as
good as the people in them and the culture in which those people work. So it's crucial to get everyone in a school community invested in a school's mission. Ownership is key. That comes from giving schools autonomy—in staffing, budgeting and instruction. From giving families a chance to choose their public schools. And from school leadership that promotes a strong sense of school identity and clear expectations of success. Reform has to come from the inside-out as well as the outside-in. There's a human side of school reform that we ignore at our peril.
But if achieving "A Nation at Risk's" vision is becoming increasingly difficult, the alternative is really no alternative. The American economy hasn't collapsed in the absence of public-school reform because its success is driven mainly by the small segment of the workforce that is highly educated. But the plight of the middle class that the reform reports of the 1980s warned about has worsened as the wage gap between high-school graduates and the college-educated has widened, creating an increasingly two-tiered society—and an ever-greater need to arm every American with the high-quality education that "A Nation at Risk" envisioned.

单选题 The U. S. Department of Education's report
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】第一段提到,教育部的这份报告强烈批评了美国的教育,发起了有史以来最大规模的教育改革运动。
单选题 One of the reform measures of NCLB is to
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】第二段提到,在美国的教育体制中,以前是当地教育部门各自制定标准,在作者看来,这无益于实现国家的教育目标(get us where we need to go educationally)。改革后,NCLB要求各州制定自己的标准(statewide standards)。可见,NCLB要求的是各州制定标准,至于说这些标准needs to be taken to its logical conclusion—rigorous national standards,这只是作者认为的合理推论,并不是NCLB的要求。
单选题 NCLB might fail its ambitious goals if
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】第二段最后一句(括号内句子)提到,NCLB规定只惩罚那些达不到州制定的标准的学校,这存在着一个严重的缺陷,即各州可能把自己的标准制定得比较低,以便使它们的许多学校都能达到这些标准的要求。这样一来,NCLB旨在提高教育质量的改革就会受挫。
单选题 The third paragraph suggests that
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】第三段第一句是本段的主题句。作者在这一段表达的主要观点是:要想提高学校教育质量,不能仅靠来自于学校以外的动力(指教育部或州教育部门),因为学校是一个复杂的社会组织,它们成功与否取决于每天发生的各种各样的人与人之间的互动。本段最后得出结论说:教育改革的成功应该是内外因素相互作用的结果,我们不能忽视学校改革中的人的因素,这样会给我们带来(失败的)危险。总之,要给学校一定的自主权(giving schools autonomy)。
单选题 The author suggests that the aims of the education reform
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】在第二段第一句,作者认为教育部报告中提出的雄心勃勃的目标最终是可以实现的。在第四段,作者再次表达了对实现这些目标的信心,认为虽然实现这些目标的前景变得越来越困难,但是为了确保更多的孩子将来能过上更美好的生活,我们没有别的出路(the alternative is really no alternative)。