复合题

Directions: Read the following text carefully and then translate the underlined segments into Chinese. Your translation should be written clearly on ANSWER SHEET 2.

People have wondered for a long time how their personalities and behaviors are formed. It is not easy to explain why one person is intelligent and another is not, or why one is cooperative and another is competitive. 

Social scientists are, of course, extremely interested in these types of questions. They want to explain why we possess certain characteristics and exhibit certain behaviors. There are no clear answers yet, but two distinct schools of thought on the matter have developed. As one might expect, the two approaches are very different from each other. The controversy is often conveniently referred to as “nature vs nurture.” 

Those who support the “nature” side of the conflict believe that our personalities and behavior patterns are largely determined by biological factors. 【C1】 That our environment has little, if anything, to do with our abilities, characteristics and behavior is central to this theory. Taken to an extreme, this theory maintains that our behavior is pre-determined to such a great degree that we are almost completely governed by our instincts. 

Those who support the “nurture” theory, that is, they advocate education, are often called behaviorists. They claim that our environment is more important than our biologically based instincts in determining how we will act. A behaviorist, B. F. Skinner, sees humans as beings whose behavior is almost completely shaped by their surroundings. 【C2】 The behaviorists maintain that, like machines, humans respond to environmental stimuli as the basis of their behavior. 

Let us examine the different explanations about one human characteristic, intelligence, offered by the two theories. 【C3】 Supporters of the “nature” theory insist that we are born with a certain capacity for learning that is biologically determined. Needless to say, they don’t believe that factors in the environment have much influence on what is basically a predetermined characteristic. On the other hand, behaviorists argue that our intelligence levels are the product of our experience.【C4】 Behaviorists suggest that the child who is raised in an environment where there are many stimuli which develop his or her capacity for appropriate responses will experience greater intellectual development. 

The social and political implications of these two theories are profound. In the United States, blacks often score below whites on standardized intelligence tests. This leads some “nature” proponents to conclude that blacks are biologically inferior to whites. 【C5】 Behaviorists, in contrast, say that differences in scores are due to the fact that blacks are often deprived of many of the educational and other environmental advantages that whites enjoy. 

Most people think neither of these theories can yet fully explain human behavior. 

问答题 【C1】
【正确答案】这种理论的核心是,我们身处的环境同我们的才能、性格特征和行为,即使有关系的话,也是微不足道的。
【答案解析】
问答题 【C2】
【正确答案】行为主义者坚信,人像机器一样,会对环境刺激做出反应,这是他们行为的基础。
【答案解析】
问答题 【C3】
【正确答案】支持“天性”论的人坚持认为,我们生来就具有一定的学习才能,这是由生物因素决定的。
【答案解析】
问答题 【C4】
【正确答案】行为主义者认为,如果一个儿童成长的环境有很多刺激物,并且这些刺激物能够提升其做出适当反应的能力,那么,这个儿童将会有更高的智力发展。
【答案解析】
问答题 【C5】
【正确答案】相反,行为主义者认为,成绩的差异是由于黑人常常被剥夺了在教育及其他环境方面的许多有利条件造成的,而这些条件白人都能享有。
【答案解析】