单选题 .  SECTION A  MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTIONS
    PASSAGE ONE
    (1)Ask an American schoolchild what he or she is learning in school these days and you might even get a reply, provided you ask it in Spanish. But don't bother, here's the answer: Americans nowadays are not learning any of the things that we learned in our day, like reading and writing. Apparently these are considered antique old subjects, invented by white males to oppress women and minorities.
    (2)What are they learning? In a Vermont college town I found the answer sitting in a toy store book rack, next to typical kids' books like "Heather Has Two Mommies and Daddy Is Dysfunctional". It's a teacher's guide called "Happy To Be Me", subtitled "Building Self Esteem".
    (3)Self-esteem, as it turns out, is a big subject in American classrooms. Many American schools see building it as important as teaching reading and writing. They call it "whole language" teaching, borrowing terminology from the granola people to compete in the education marketplace.
    (4)No one ever spent a moment building my self-esteem when I was in school. In fact, from the day I first stepped inside a classroom my serf-esteem was one big demolition site. All that mattered was "the subject," be it geography, history, or mathematics. I was praised when I remembered that "near", "fit", "friendly", "pleasing", "like" and their opposites took the dative case in Latin. I was scolded when I forgot what a cosine was good for. Generally I lived my school years beneath a torrent of criticism so consistent I eventually ceased to hear it, as people who live near the sea eventually stop hearing the waves.
    (5)Schools have changed. Scolding is out, for one thing. More important, subjects have changed. Whereas I learned English, modem kids learn something called  "language skills." Whereas I learned writing, modem kids learn something called "communication". Communication, the book tells us, is seven per cent words, 23 per cent facial expression, 20 per cent tone of voice, and 50 per cent body language. So this column, with its carefully chosen words, would earn me at most a grade of seven per cent. That is, if the school even gave out something as oppressive and demanding as grades.
    (6)The result is that, in place of English classes, American children are getting a course in How to Win Friends and Influence People. Consider the new attitude toward journal writing: I remember one high school English class when we were required to keep a journal. The idea was to emulate those great writers who confided in diaries, searching their souls and perfecting their critical thinking on paper.
    (7)"Happy To Be Me" states that journals are a great way for students to get in touch with their feelings. Tell students they can write one sentence or a whole page. Reassure them that no one, not even you, will read what they write. After the unit, hopefully all students will be feeling good about themselves and will want to share some of their entries with the class.
    (8)There was a time when no self-respecting book for English teachers would use "great" or "hopefully" that way. Moreover, back then the purpose of English courses (an antique term for "Unit") was not to help students "feel good about themselves." Which is good, because all that scolding didn't make me feel particularly good about anything.
    PASSAGE TWO
    (1)The American screen has long been a. smoky place, at least since 1942's Now, Voyager, in which Bette Davis and Paul Henreid showed how to make and seal a romantic deal over a pair of cigarettes that were smoldering as much as the stars. Today cigarettes are more common onscreen than at any other time since midcentury: 75% of all Hollywood films—including 36% of those rated G or PG—show tobacco use, according to a recent survey by the University of California, San Francisco.
    (2)Audiences, especially kids, are taking notice. Two recent studies, published in Lancet and Pediatrics, have found that among children as young as 10, those exposed to the most screen smoking are up to 2.7 times as likely as others to pick up the habit. Worse, it's the ones from nonsmoking homes who are hit the hardest, perhaps because they are spared the dirty ashtrays and moldy drapes that make real-world smoking a lot less appealing than the clean cinematic version.
    (3)Now the Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)—the folks behind the designated-driver campaign—are pushing to get the smokes off the screen. "Some movies show kids up to 14 incidents of smoking per hour," says Barry Bloom, HSPH's dean. "We're in the business of preventing disease, and cigarettes are the No. 1 preventable cause."
    (4)If there's one thing health experts know, it's that you don't influence behavior by telling people what to do. You do it by exposing them to enough cases of people behaving well that it creates a new norm. What made the designated-driver concept catch on in the 1980s was partly that Harvard and the ad agencies it worked with persuaded TV networks to slip the idea into their shows. There's a reason a designated-driver poster appeared in the bar on Cheers, and it's not because it made the jokes funnier.
    (5)"The idea appeared in 160 prime-time episodes over four years," says Jay Winsten, HSPH's associate dean. "Drunk-driving fatalities fell 25% over the next three years."
    (6)Harvard long believed that getting cigarettes out of movies could have as powerful an effect, but it wouldn't be easy. Cigarette makers had a history of striking product-placement deals with Hollywood, and while the 1998 tobacco settlement prevents that, nothing stops directors from incorporating smoking into Scenes on their own.
    (7)In 1999 Harvard began holding one-on-one meetings with studio executives trying to change that, and last year the Motion Picture Association of America flung the door open, inviting Bloom to make a presentation in February to all the studios. Harvard's advice was direct: Get the butts entirely out, or at least make smoking unappealing.
    (8)A few films provide a glimpse of what a no-smoking—or low-smoking—Hollywood would be like. Producer Lindsay Doran, who once helped persuade director John Hughes to keep Ferris Bueller smoke-free in the 1980s hit, wanted to do the same for the leads of her 2006 movie Stranger Than Fiction. When a writer convinced her that the character played by Emma Thompson had to smoke, Doran relented, but from the way Thompson hacks her way through the film and snuffs out her cigarettes in a palmful of spit, it's clear the glamour's gone. And remember all the smoking in The Devil Wears Prada? No? That's because the producers of that film kept it out entirely. "No one smoked in that movie," says Doran, "and no one noticed."
    (9)Such movies are hardly the rule, but the pressure is growing. Like smokers, studios may conclude that quitting the habit is not just a lot healthier but also a lot smarter.
    PASSAGE THREE
    (1)Socrates, son of Sophroniscus, a sculptor, was philosopher of Athens, Greece. It is said that in early life he practiced his father's art. In middle life he married Xanthippe, who is legendary as a shrew, although the stories have little basis in ascertainable fact. It is not certain who were Socrates's teachers in philosophy, but he seems to have been acquainted with the doctrines of Parmenides, Heraclitus, Anaxagoras, and the atomists. He was widely known for his intellectual powers even before he was 40, when, ac- cording to Plato's report of Socrates's speech in the Apology, the oracle at Delphi pronounced him the wisest man in Greece. In that speech Socrates maintained that he was puzzled by this acclaim until he discovered that, while others professed knowledge without realizing their ignorance, he at least was aware of his own ignorance.
    (2)Socrates became convinced that his calling was to search for wisdom about right conduct by which he might guide the intellectual and moral improvement of the Athenians. Neglecting his own affairs, he spent his time discussing virtue, justice, and piety wherever his fellow citizens congregated. Some felt that he also neglected public duty, for he never sought public office, although he was famous for his courage in the military campaigns in which he served. In his self-appointed task as gadfly—someone annoys other people by criticizing them—to the Athenians, Socrates made numerous enemies.
    (3)Aristophanes mimicked Socrates in his play The Clouds and attributed to him some of the faults of the Sophists—professional teachers of rhetoric. Although Socrates in fact baited the Sophists, his other critics seem to have held a view similar to that of Aristophanes. In 399 B.C. he was brought to trial for corrupting youth and for religious heresies. Obscure political issues surrounded the trial, but it seems that Socrates was tried also for being the friend and teacher of Alcibiades and Critias, both of whom had betrayed Athens. The trial and death of Socrates, who was given poison to drink, are described with great dramatic power in the Apology, the Crito, and the Phaedo of Plato.
    (4)Socrates's contributions to philosophy were a new method of approaching knowledge, a conception of the soul as the seat both of normal waking consciousness and of moral character, and a sense of the universe as purposively mind-ordered. His method, called dialectic, consisted in examining statements by pursuing their implications, on the assumption that if a statement were true it could not lead to false consequences. The method may have been suggested by Zeno of Elea, but Socrates refmed it and applied it to ethical problems.
    (5)His doctrine of the soul led him to the belief that all virtues converge into one, which is the good, or knowledge of one's true self and purposes through the course of a lifetime. Knowledge in turn depends on the nature or essence of things as they really are, for the underlying forms of things are more real than their experienced exemplifications. This conception leads to a teleological view of the world that all the forms participate in and lead to the highest form, the form of the good. Plato later elaborated this doctrine as central to his own philosophy. Socrates's view is often described as holding virtue and knowledge to be identical, so that no man knowingly does wrong. Since virtue is identical with knowledge, it can be taught, but not as a professional specialty as the Sophists had pretended to teach it. However, Socrates himself gave no final answer to how virtue can be learned.
    PASSAGE FOUR
    (1)An American survey has shown that each year every employed person loses three to four working days from colds and allied complaints, and every school child loses five to six days of schooling. Colds waste more time than strikes. The conquest of the common cold is therefore a thoroughly worthwhile ambition.
    (2)In 1961, Sir Christopher Andrewes found that the great killing infections like syphilis or poliomyelitis are each caused by one specific micro-organism, or, at worst, a small group of closely related parasites. By contrast it has slowly become apparent that the common cold is not a disease but a large group of similar diseases, caused possibly, by anything between fifty and one hundred different organisms.
    (3)Much of Sir Christopher's book is taken up by an account of the struggle to identify, the germs which do cause colds. At first it was thought that bacteria were responsible because certain bacteria are commonly found in the noses and throats of cold victims. But Dr. W. Kruse of the Hygienic Institute of the University of Leipzig in 1914 provided the first evidence that a virus might be concerned by launching experimental infectious.
    (4)Since that time thousands of volunteers have subjected themselves to similar experimental infections, and for early twenty years most of such work has been done at Salisbury where the guinea pigs are rewarded by a ten-day holiday, all found that this "clumsy, expensive and unreliable" use of human volunteers was necessary because for a long time chimpanzees were the only other animals known to be susceptible to infection by common cold germs, and chimpanzees were far too expensive and unruly for routine use.
    (5)Growing cold viruses in the laboratory also proved difficult until one of the men involved demonstrated his possession of that most precious scientific faculty-serendipity.
    (6)Cold viruses were being grown with only moderate success in laboratory cultures of lung tissue from human embryos. The lung tissue cultures were kept alive by a salt solution containing added vitamins and a number of other ingredients. One day at Salisbury Dr. David Tyrrell found that this salt solution was faulty, and in order to keep his tissue cultures going he hastily borrowed a supply from another laboratory. When the imported solution was added to tissue cultures infected with cold viruses the lung tissue cells began to degenerate in a manner typical of tissues parasitized by active viral particles.
    (7)Dr. Tyrrell soon discovered that the borrowed fluid provided a more acid medium in his culture tubes than that produced by the native Salisbury brew. The nose provides a slightly acid environment, and Dr. Tyrrell realized that a degree of acidity was just what nose-inhabiting viruses needed in order to thrive outside the body. Thus a happy accident enabled a perspicacious scientist to modify the cold virus culture technique and thenceforward the whole exercise proved far easier and more profitable.
    (8)Much of common cold folklore is demolished. Draughts, chilling and wet feet do not bring colds on, says Sir Christopher, and clean, healthy living with lots of fresh air, plenty of exercise, good, plain food and a cold bath every morning may be good for the soul and the waistline, but does nothing to keep cold viruses at bay.
    (9)Colds are not very infectious—which will surprise most of us—so there is really no excuse for staying away from work when you have one. All the remedies so far invented have one thing in common—they are useless. In temperate countries, colds are commoner during the winter, but what the "winter factor" is which brings them on remains unknown. Most of us harbour cold viruses in our noses throughout the year, and many colds are probably not "caught" at all, but start because somehow the resident viruses become activated from time to time.
    (10)To write a book about colds at this stage, says Sir Christopher, is rather like writing a review of a play in the middle of the first act. Since he wrote those words, workers at Salisbury have announced the production of the first cold vaccine which will protect against infection by one particular cold virus. Unfortunately there are very many cold viruses and complete immunity from colds by vaccination would require the administration of a separate vaccine for every virus in the book.1.  In Paragraph Three "whole language" teaching is in quotation marks because ______PASSAGE ONE
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】 修辞题。根据上下文判断作者此处使用引号不可能是引用别人的话、引用其他资料或外来语的翻译;根据全文的基调,作者对新的教育方式持怀疑态度,对这种所谓的“全语言”教育方式的全面性持怀疑态度,故B为正确答案。
[参考译文]
   PASSAGE ONE
   (1)如果你用西班牙语问一个美国孩子这些天在学校学习了什么,你可能会得到答复。但别麻烦了,答复就是:美国人现在不学习任何我们当时学习的东西,如阅读和写作。显然,这些被认为是久远陈旧的科目,是由白人男性发明来压迫女性和少数民族的。
   (2)那么他们学习什么呢?在佛蒙特州的一个大学城,我在玩具店的书架上发现了答案,书架旁边是典型的儿童书籍,如《希瑟有两个妈妈和一个爸爸是不正常的》,还有一本教师用的指南书,名为《快乐做自己》,其副标题为“建立自尊”。
   (3)事实上,自尊是美国课堂上重要的课题。许多美国学校认为建立自尊和教授阅读和写作同等重要。他们称之为“全语言教学法”,这是从格兰诺拉人那里借用的术语,以便在教育市场上竞争。
   (4)在我上学的时候,没有人花时间来帮助我建立自尊。事实上,从我第一天走进教室,我的自尊就像被拆毁的工地一样。重要的只是课程,不论是地理、历史或数学。当我记住“附近”“健康”“友好”“高兴”“喜欢”和它们的反义词在拉丁语中有格的形式时,我就会受到表扬。忘记余弦的用处时我就会被责骂。通常,我的学习生涯都处在持续不断的批评中,这种情况一直如此,我最终选择避而不听,就像住在海边的人们最终不去听海浪声。
   (5)学校已经改变了。一方面,责骂已经过时。更重要的是,学习的科目也改变了。我当时学的是英语,现代的孩子学习的则是所谓的“语言技能”课。我学的是写作,现代的孩子学习的是所谓的“交流”课。书上说,交流包括7%的话语,23%的面部表情,20%的语调和50%的身体语言。因此本专栏,尽管精心选词造句,却最多让我拿到分数的7%。也就是说,如果学校要打出一些跟成绩一样压抑和苛求的东西的话。
   (6)结果表明,美国孩子开始学习关于“如何赢得朋友和影响他人”的课程,这取代了英语课。细想一下这种关于日记写作的新态度,我记起在一节高中英语课堂上我们当时被要求写一篇日记。这个想法是仿效那些拥有写日记习惯的伟大作家,他们在日记中寻找他们的灵魂并完善其写作的批判性思维。
   (7)《快乐做自己》书中说日记是让学生接触自己心灵的重要手段。告诉学生他们可以写一个句子或一篇文章。向他们保证没有人,甚至是你自己,会读到他们写的东西。在该环节之后,所有的学生都有望自信起来,愿意与全班同学分享他们的一些作品。
   (8)曾经有一段时间没有关于自重内容的英语书籍,教师就以自重的方式使用“很好”或“希望”这两个词语。此外,当时英语课程的目的(“单元”是一个陈旧术语)并不是帮助学生“自信起来”。这是很好的,因为所有的责骂没让我觉得一切都是好的。
   PASSAGE TWO
   (1)美国的电影银幕一直以来就是一个烟雾缭绕的地方,至少从1942年开始就是这样的。在这一年的电影《扬帆》中,贝特·戴维斯和保罗·亨里德表演了怎样一边吸着两根如星星般燃烧着的烟一边达成和终止一份浪漫的协议。如今,在电影中香烟比20世纪中叶以来的任何时候都更为常见。据旧金山加州大学最近的一份调查显示,75%的好莱坞电影里——包括36%的大众级电影和普通级电影——均出现了吸烟镜头。
   (2)观众,尤其是孩子们,开始注意到这些,最近分别发表在《柳叶刀》和《小儿科》杂志上的两项研究发现,在10岁的儿童中,经常看到吸烟镜头的小孩染上吸烟恶习的概率是其他小孩的2.7倍。更糟糕的是,无烟家庭的孩子更容易受到影响,这可能是因为他们没有见识过肮脏的烟灰缸和发霉的窗帘,因此不知道吸烟在真实世界中并没有像干净的电影镜头中那么有吸引力。
   (3)现在,哈佛大学化共卫生学院在禁止酒后驾驶运动之后,正在努力推行让电影远离香烟的运动。哈佛大学公共卫生学院的院长巴里·布鲁姆说:“在一些电影中,孩子们每小时能看到14次吸烟镜头。我们的工作是预防疾病,而香烟是首当其冲要禁止的。”
   (4)如果有一件事是健康专家所确知的,那就是通过告诉别人该做什么无法影响到他们的行为。要影响他人,需要让他们接触到足够多的正面事例,这样可以创造出新的行为准则。禁止酒后驾车运动在20世纪80年代得以流行,部分原因是哈佛大学及与之合作的广告公司成功地说服了各电视台在电视节目中融入这一观念。Cheers节目中的酒吧里出现禁止酒后驾车运动的海报是有原因的,而不仅仅是为了让节目更有趣。
   (5)哈佛大学公共卫生学院的副院长杰伊·文斯滕说:“四年多的时间里,抵制酒后驾车的观念在黄金时段播出的160集电视剧集中出现过。酒后驾驶造成的死亡人数在接下来的三年里下降了25%。”
   (6)哈佛大学一直相信剔除电影中的吸烟镜头也能达到同样的效果,但要做到这一点并不容易。烟草商与好莱坞有着长期的产品营销交易的历史。虽然1998年的烟草协议禁止了这一点,但并没有什么行动可以阻止导演们将吸烟镜头纳入到影片中。
   (7)1999年,哈佛大学开始与电影公司的经理进行一对一的会谈,以试图改变这种情况。去年,美国电影协会对他们敞开了大门,并邀请布鲁姆院长在2月向所有电影公司做一次演讲。哈佛的意见是直接的:彻底剔除电影里的吸烟镜头,或者至少使这些镜头不那么具有益惑性。
   (8)若干电影展示了在没有吸烟镜头或很少吸烟镜头的情况下,好莱坞电影会是怎么样的。制作人林赛·多兰在20世纪80年代曾说服导演约翰·休斯不让角色弗瑞斯·巴勒在电影中吸烟,她想在其2006年的电影《笔下求生》中做同样的事。一位作家说服了多兰,说艾玛·汤普森饰演的角色需要吸烟,她同意了,但在电影里汤普森要按照多兰所说的方式减轻了她吸烟所带的影响,用一口痰去掐灭烟,很明显,这样魅力就不再了。还记得《时尚女魔头》里的所有吸烟场景吗?不记得了?那是因为该电影的制片人完全没有用这些镜头。“电影里没有人吸烟,”多兰说,“也没人注意到这一点。”
   (9)这类电影还未成趋势,但压力在增强。就像吸烟者一样,制片厂可能认为,放弃吸烟的习惯不仅仅会让人更健康,而且会让人更明智。
   PASSAGE THREE
   (1)苏格拉底是雕塑家Sophroniscus的儿子,希腊雅典的一位哲学家。据说在青年时期,他曾从事父亲的手艺。到了中年他与赞西佩结婚,传说中她是一名泼妇,但这些说法几乎没有确凿的事实依据。苏格拉底的哲学导师是谁还不确定,但他似乎受到了巴门尼德、赫拉克利特、阿那克萨哥拉和原子论者的思想的影响。甚至在他40岁之前他的智慧就已经广为人知,根据柏拉图记录的苏格拉底在《申辩篇》里的演说,德尔斐的神谕处宣称他是希腊最聪明的人。在那次演说中,苏格拉底坚持认为他对这一称誉感到困惑,直到他发现别人自以为知道很多而没有意识到自己的无知,他至少知道自己的无知。
   (2)苏格拉底开始确信他的使命是去寻找有关正确行为的智慧,由此他可以指引雅典人的智力和道德得以提升。在任何同胞聚集的场合,他所有的时间都在讨论美德、正义和虔诚而忽视了自己的事。有些人认为他也忽视了公共责任,因为他从不寻求公职,尽管在他加入的军事战役中他因英勇而闻名。在他自封作为雅典人的牛虻(因批评别人而惹人讨厌的人)的任务中,苏格拉底树敌众多。
   (3)阿里斯托芬在他的戏剧《云》中模仿了苏格拉底,并把一些诡辩家——修辞专业教师——的错误归因于他。尽管苏格拉底实际上惹怒了诡辩家,其他的批评者似乎持有类似于阿里斯托芬的观点。公元前399年,他因腐蚀青年和宗教异端受到了审判。模糊的政治问题笼罩着审判,但似乎苏格拉底也因是亚西比德和柯里西亚斯的朋友和老师受到了审判,这两个都背叛了雅典。苏格拉底的审判与死亡,以及饮毒药而亡,在柏拉图的《申辩篇》《克里托》和《斐多篇》中被加以修饰并赋予极大的戏剧色彩。
   (4)苏格拉底对哲学的贡献包括提出了一种获取知识的新方法,认为心灵是正常清醒意识和道德品质的发源地,将宇宙理解成受意识的主观控制。他的方法称为辩证法,在于通过探寻命题的含义来检验其真伪,以“一个命题若是真的,它不可能导致错误的结果”为假设。该方法可能是由埃利亚的齐诺提出来的,但是苏格拉底将其进行了完善,并将其应用于伦理问题。
   (5)他的灵魂论使他相信所有的美德都汇聚成一个,即善,或对真实自我和人生目的的认知。认知又取决于事物真实的本质,因为事物的内在形式比其实证经验更加真实。这一概念致使产生了关于世界的目的论,即所有的形式参与并形成最高形式——善的形式。后来柏拉图详细阐明这条教义是苏格拉底自己的哲学核心。苏格拉底的观点经常被描述为视美德和知识为同类事物,所以没有人故意做错。既然美德与知识是相同的,那它便是可以传授的,但不是作为一种专长像诡辩者假装传授它那样加以传授。然而关于如何习得美德,苏格拉底本人没有给出最终的答案。
   PASSAGE FOUR
   (1)美国的一项调查显示,每位员工每年会因感冒或类似的疾病损失三到四个工作日,每个学生也会损失五到六天的上学时间。感冒比罢工浪费了更多时间。因此,克服普通感冒成了非常值得去追求的远大抱负。
   (2)1961年,克里斯托弗·安德鲁斯爵士发现,像梅毒或脊髓灰质炎这类具有巨大杀伤力的感染疾病是由一种特殊的微生物引起的,或者往坏了说是由一小群联系紧密的寄生虫引起的。相比较而言,这个事实已经逐渐变得显而易见:普通感冒不是一种病,百是可能由50-100种不同的微生物造成的许多类似疾病的集群。
   (3)克里斯托弗爵士书中的大部分内容写的都是他如何努力确认究竟是何种细菌引发了感冒。起初,他认为细菌是罪魁祸首,因为在感冒患者的鼻腔和喉咙内常常会发现某种细菌。但是,莱比锡大学卫生研究所的克鲁斯博士于1914年首次证明了病毒可能和实验感染有关。
   (4)此后,成千上万个志愿者献身于类似的感染实验。在早期的二十年里,大部分工作都是在索尔兹伯里完成的。在这里,每个实验对象有十天的休假奖励。所有人发现,用人类来当志愿者的这种“复杂难懂、昂贵、不可靠”的方法是必须的,因为在很长的一段时间里,猩猩都是绝无仅有会感染普通感冒病毒的几种动物,而且如果平常都拿猩猩来做试验品的话,花费的钱会更多,也更难控制。
   (5)实验室越来越多的病毒感冒也证明了用人类当试验品具有困难性,直到其中参与的一名男士向世人展示了他身上所具备的某种最重要的科学天赋,即于无意中有重大发现的天赋。
   (6)在从人类胚胎中提取的肺组织实验室培养菌中,感冒病毒得到了适度发展。加有维他命和许多其他成分的盐溶液使这些肺组织培养茵得以存活。一天,在索尔兹伯里工作的戴维·泰尼尔博士发现盐溶液出了问题,为了让这些肺组织培养菌继续存活,于是他急急忙忙地从另外一间实验室借了一份溶液。当把这份借来的溶液倒入受感冒病毒感染的肺组织培养菌的时候,这些肺组织细胞居然像一种被活体病毒介质寄宿的典型组织一样开始分化。
   (7)泰尼尔博士很快发现,借来的盐溶液在细菌培养管中提供的酸性媒介比原来在索尔兹伯里制作的那份多。鼻腔为病毒的生长提供了一个较为酸性的环境,泰尼尔博士也意识到,一定程度的酸性恰恰就是寄居鼻腔内部的病毒在体外存活的必要条件。因此,一个皆大欢喜的意外使一位有见地的科学家得以修正感冒病菌培养技术,也进一步证明了整个操作更容易也更有利可图。
   (8)大部分治疗普通感冒的偏方均被推翻。克里斯托弗爵士说,凉风、寒冷和脚湿都不会使人感冒。而干净、健康、空气新鲜的居住环境,经常锻炼、吃清淡有益的食物、每天早上洗个冷水澡都有益于身心健康,但这些方法却无助于阻隔病毒。
   (9)感冒其实没那么容易传染——这会使我们大多数人感到惊讶——所以要是你感冒了,可真没什么理由请假了。迄今为止发明的所有治疗方法都有一个共同之处——它们均不起作用。在气候温和的国家,人们在春天感冒的几率更高,但导致此种情况的是哪种“冬天因素”依旧还不得而知,我们大多数人的感冒病毒都是全年寄宿在鼻腔内部的,而且有可能你根本就不是得了感冒,只是刚刚有点反应,因为寄宿病毒时不时会被激活。
   (10)克里斯托弗爵士说,写一本关于此阶段感冒的书就好比要在第一幕戏进行到一半的时候写戏剧评论。在他写完这番话后,在索尔兹伯里工作的员工就已经对外宣称:他们生产出来的第一代感冒疫苗将保护人们不受某种感冒病毒的感染。不幸的是,感冒病毒的种类太多,通过接种疫苗的方式完全远离感冒将需要人们针对书中涉及的每种病毒都分别接种疫苗。