单选题 Most students in grades K-12 attend school for 6 to 7 hours a day, 180 days per year. Some schools offer extended learning by adding extra time to the school day or increasing the length of the school year. Some states are moving to this type of schedule in an attempt to increase student achievement. Is it worthwhile?
Longer days allow for more instruction in core classes, individualized attention and additional tutoring time for struggling students. Schools that switched to longer days reported significant gains in language arts, math and science. The most notable change was a gain of about 20 percent more proficiency in math from 2006 to 2010. However, the additional time must be accompanied by quality instruction to have an impact.
Longer school days also have positive implications for teachers, allowing for more collaboration with colleagues, planning time and opportunities for on-campus professional development. Some districts that use extended time have raised salaries and increased benefits to compensate teachers for the extra hours.
Longer days can also help close the achievement gap between socioeconomic groups. Families who can afford it often supplement their children's education with additional classes and tutoring. With longer days, children from less-wealthy families would have these same opportunities. Students in schools with extended days average seven hours of instruction in art, music and physical education, which is double the national average.
Advocates of longer days argue that American students spend less time in school than their counterparts in other nations and are consequently lagging behind. In fact, American students attend school for 900 to 1,000 hours per year. Finland, which consistently performs well on standardized tests, averages 608 hours of instruction at the elementary level per year. By middle school, many American students have received many more instructional hours than students in Japan, Korea and Finland, yet these three countries continue to post high scores.
Additional time in school means more energy costs, higher salaries and more resources. While adding time appears to have positive effects, it comes at a cost that some schools cannot afford. Adding time to the school day increases school budgets an additional 6 to 20 percent more per year. Cash-strapped schools may not be able to cover this additional cost without revising their budgets. The question that schools must answer is whether the additional instruction and enrichment time is worth the additional costs.
单选题 Some schools in the U.S. add extra time to the school day or school year to ______.
  • A. demand larger school budgets
  • B. make more money out of the students
  • C. help take care of young students
  • D. improve students academically
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】第一段第三句有increase student achievement(提高学生学习成绩),文章没提及其他选项。
单选题 As a result of extended school days, ______.
  • A. teachers in related schools can benefit financially
  • B. teachers have fewer opportunities to interact
  • C. quality instruction has become hardly accessible
  • D. students spent 20% more time on math than on other subjects
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】第二段说明学生的数学成绩提高20%,而不是用于数学的时间增加20%。本段最后一句说明要取得良好的教学效果,增加的课时也要保质保量。第三段提到有些学校为相关教师涨工资或增加补贴,也就是使教师增加了收入。
单选题 According to Paragraph 4, longer school days ______.
  • A. force rich families to provide additional tutoring for their children
  • B. help narrow income gaps between rich and poor in the United States
  • C. increase the opportunities of employment for the underprivileged
  • D. benefit poor families by providing the children with additional classes
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】第四段讲,课时数的增加有助于缩小贫富家庭学生之间的成绩差异,而不是收入差异。该段第三句说明,由于学校延长了授课时间,不富裕家庭的孩子与富裕家庭的孩子一样享有相同的机会,不用找家教了,而且学习免费。
单选题 Paragraph 5 argues that American students ______.
  • A. spend less time in schools than in some other nations
  • B. fall behind international students due to less time in school
  • C. spend more time in schools than in some other nations
  • D. are lazier than those in such countries as Japan and Korea
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】第五段讲,芬兰小学生每年上学的平均时间是608小时,而美国学生是900~1000小时,但芬兰学生标准测试的成绩不错。读小学时,美国学生上课的时间要超过日本、韩国和芬兰。这些证据表明,美国的小学生在学校上课的时间要多于某些国家。
单选题 The last paragraph is mainly concerned with ______.
  • A. the urgent need to add time to the school day
  • B. the cost-effectiveness of extending school days
  • C. the benefit of additional time in school
  • D. schools' attempt to cut down their budgets
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】最后一段关注的是费用问题。增加课时意味着学校支出的增加,学校年预算的涨幅在6%~20%之间。不增加预算就无法承担更多的费用,所以学校要算经济账:增加课时是否划算?
单选题 The central idea of this passage is that ______.
  • A. student performance improves, but at a high cost
  • B. it's silly to improve achievement by extending school days
  • C. lengthening the school day is impossible at most schools
  • D. school time should be lengthened at any cost
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】文章作者承认延长学生上课时间有种种好处,只要学校有钱,不妨采取这种策略使师生受益,但问题是学校并不是“不差钱”,额外的支出从哪解决?言外之意是代价不小。