单选题 Oil prices, an economic scourge in decades past, have soared to record levels in recent years. But the fallout often seemed negligible: Americans kept spending; employment kept growing; factories, construction crews and retail stores stayed busy.
Now, however, the economy may be starting to sputter as damage from the weak housing market drags down growth. If payrolls drop significantly, will high-price crude oil begin to cause pain in a way that it hasn"t in nearly three decades?
Many economists do not think so, maintaining that if the United States entered a recession, the price of oil would quickly drop.
"The United States is the single largest oil-consuming nation in the world," said Stephen P. A. Brown, director of energy economics at the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. "A slowdown here ought to bring the price of oil down."
That view is by no means unanimous. The global economy has been growing rapidly, and oil consumption overseas keeps rising. A few economists say it is possible that even if the American economy weakens, demand abroad will be strong enough to keep oil prices high.
"Our relative importance in the global markets is diminishing," said Larry Goldstein, president of the Petroleum Industry Research Foundation in New York. "An American economic slowdown", he said, "won"t have a visible impact on high oil demand and it won"t have a visible impact on high oil prices."
If that view proves to be right, the United States could conceivably find itself in a situation reminiscent of the 1970s, with weak economic growth and high-price oil taking a double bite out of consumers" pocketbooks.
The situation is murky in part because there is little historical precedent for understanding today"s oil market. Less than a decade ago, oil fell below $11 a barrel. Oil at $50 was a distant prospect, and the prevailing wisdom was that a run-up of that extent would do serious economic damage.
But as the global economy boomed, oil blew past $50 late in 2004, then past $60 in mid- 2005. Many Americans complained about the rising price of gasoline, but the economy shrugged off pump prices that would exceed $3 a gallon, and kept growing.
On Sept. 20, crude oil for next-month delivery settled at a record price of $83.32 a barrel and has stayed above $80 most days since, ending yesterday at $81.44, up $1.50 from Wednesday. (Adjusted for inflation, the record high for oil was nearly $102 a barrel early in 1980, after the Iranian revolution, but that price level did not last long.)
Part of the reason that costly oil has not done too much damage, it seems clear, is that the economy has become less sensitive to energy prices than it was in the 1970s.
单选题 What can"t we learn from the first paragraph?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 本题为事实细节题。由第一段可以得知,在过去数十年里的一个经济灾难就是石油价格不断飙升并创下了近几年来的最高纪录,因此A项正确。“但是它所带来的社会影响似乎微不足道:美国人持续消费;就业率保持增长;工厂、建筑队和零售商店依然忙碌。”所以B项是正确的。C项太绝对化,不可能一点也不关注油价的飙升。故选C。第一段第一句中,不断上升的油价对美国经济来说可能是个灾难,所以D项也正确。
单选题 Which of the following is true?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 本题为事实细节题。第四段,经济学主任史蒂芬·布朗曾谈道:“美国是世界上最大的石油消费国,美国石油消费量下降应该会引起石油价格下跌。”A项与原文意思相反。第五段指出,一些经济学家称即使美国经济衰退,国外石油需求量将足以维持石油价格居高不下,全球经济迅速发展,国外石油消费量持续上涨。所以B项是错误的。根据第九段,尽管石油的价格将超过每加仑3美元并持续上涨,美国经济并未受到影响,所以美国不会受到很大的冲击,C项符合题意。从第十段可以看出特别高的价格并不会持续太久,D项错误。
单选题 What does the word "murky" mean in paragraph 8?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 本题为词义理解题。考点在第八段:情势并不明朗,部分原因是人们没有可借鉴的历史经验来解释当今的石油市场状况。不到十年间,油价狂跌至每桶低于11美元。每桶50美元的油价已是一个遥远的梦,人们普遍认为那种大幅度的涨价将会造成严重的经济损失。四个选项中,A项意为“模糊,不明朗的”,故选A。B项意为“兴旺的,有希望的”,C项意为“直截了当的”,D项意为“明白易懂的”,C项和D项与文中的“部分原因是人们没有可借鉴的历史经验来解释当今的石油市场状况”相矛盾,所以错误。
单选题 The passage is mainly about ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 本题为主旨大意题。文章主要讲的是油价对美国经济的影响,A项中的American depression.不符合题意;B选项中不断上升的油价所带来的后果,并非文章的重点;D项太过片面,只是文章的一小部分,不是主要内容。所以正确答案是C项。
单选题 Which of the following can best describe the USA to energy prices?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 本题注重对全文的整体把握。但主要考点在最后一段:很明显,价格昂贵的石油并没有造成太大的伤害。其中部分原因是因为与20世纪70年代相比,美国经济对于能源价格已经变得不那么敏感了。A项和C项都有“警戒的”的意思,D项是“不顾、无视”的意思,很明显是错误的。B项意为“不为所动的,不易受影响的”,只有B项接近原意,为正确答案。