单选题 "Europe needs to import to export. " That is the slogan of the European Commission's new strategy for securing its economic place in the world, unveiled this week by Peter Mandelson, the European Union's commissioner for trade. The soundbite, of course, gets the economics precisely backwards: exports are the price a country must pay for its imports; Europeans toil away making stuff for others to consume only so they can in turn get their hands on the fruits of foreign labours.
But the slogan does capture two awkward truths European exporters must now confront. First, only by offering to open its own markets can the EU hope to persuade foreign countries to open theirs. But with the collapse of the Doha round of trade talks, it is not obvious to whom the Europeans should make their offers. Second, European companies are now part of elaborate global supply chains. Clumsy efforts to protect some of them from foreign competition deprive others of the cheap inputs they need to thrive in world markets.
The new trade strategy looks at both of these dilemmas, among others. Though Mr Mandelson insists that he remains wedded to multilateral negotiations at'the World Trade Organisation, he also fancies pursuing a bit on the side with other willing trade partners. The EU will pick its partners according to three criteria: do they offer a big, growing market? Are they cutting deals with America or Japan? And are they guilty of deterring European companies, either repelling them at the border with high tariffs, or bogging them down in cumbersome rules and regulations? The strategy names ASEAN, South Korea, India and Russia as priorities, as well as two regional blocks, Mercosur and the Gulf Co-operation Council, that it is already courting. The EU will reveal its plans for China at the end of the month.
The strategy also proposes to look again at how the EU protects its own borders, because its favored weapons are prone to backfire. For example, EU ministers decided this week to slap antidumping duties on leather shoes from Vietnam and China, which threaten shoemakers in Italy, Portugal and Spain. But the duties are opposed by Europe's own retailers and some of its sportswear makers. Letting Asian workers stitch and glue sports shoes makes it possible for such firms to employ Europeans to design and market them.
Mr Mandelson presented his strategy as a way to help the EU become more competitive. Opening up to foreign rivals is, of course, an excellent way to foster competition in cloistered domestic industries. A pity then that most of his concrete proposals were about conquering markets abroad, and that the EU is still so ready to raise its defences at home.

单选题 According to the Paragraph 1, how can Europeans get their hands on the fruits of foreign labours?
[A] Europeans toil away making stuff for others to consume.
[B] Peter Mandelson unveiled new strategy for securing its economic place in the world this week.
[C] Slapping anti-dumping duties on other products from outside EU.
[D] Ask ask more foreign labours to work in EU.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[考点] 事实细节
[解析] 此题考查原文相关细节的准确理解,四个选项需要逐一判别。根据题干提示,需要审视文章的第一段。第一段谈到市场等价交换的原则,进口商品需要出口货物带来的货币换取。因此,欧洲人如果想要享受外国劳工的劳动成果,就需要对外出口商品。由此可知,A选项为正确答案。
[干扰项分析] B选项虽然在第一段中出现过,但是新战略这个行为并不能让欧洲人免费获得进口商品,而是需要实施新战略的具体内容,因此B选项不符合题干要求。C选项和D选项不是第一段提供的信息。
单选题 The reasons why the author says the slogan does capture two awkward truths European exporters must now confront include the followings except______.
[A] EU hope to persuade foreign countries to open their markets by offering to open its owns although it is not obvious to whom the Europeans should make their offers
[B] other countries were repelling EU companies at the border with high tariffs
[C] European companies are now part of elaborate global supply chains
[D] efforts to protect some of European companies from foreign competition may deprive others of the cheap inputs which these EU companies need to thrive in world markets
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[考点] 事实细节
[解析] 本题考查考生阅读文章列举信息的能力。B选项中的关税壁垒是下文中选择合作伙伴的标准时提到的,没有在需要面对的尴尬事实中列出。符合题干的要求。
[干扰项分析] 在文章的第二段中提到欧洲出口国家要面对的两大尴尬事实,第一点对应A选项。 第二点提到全球供应链环环相扣紧密联系,收之桑榆难免失之东隅,分别对应C、D选项。
单选题 Which of the following is not a basic standard of EU for picking its partners?
[A] Offering a big, growing market.
[B] Not bogging them down in cumbersome rules and regulations
[C] Not deterring European companies from their countries
[D] Cutting deals with America or Japan
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[考点] 事实细节
[解析] 本题考查考生区分主要信息和次要信息的能力,B选项虽然在第三段中也出现了,但却属于阻止欧洲公司进入国内市场的具体方式,题干问的是主要标准而非具体方式,因此B选项符合题干要求,为正确答案。
[干扰项分析] 第三段提出了欧盟在选择合作伙伴时有三大标准,即A、C、D三个选项内容。
单选题 The word "pity"(Line 3, Paragragh 5) refers to______.
[A] competition in cloistered domestic industries
[B] opening up to foreign rivals
[C] Mr Mandelson's strategy
[D] his proposals were about conquering markets abroad while EU is still so ready to raise its defenses at home
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[考点] 词汇短语
[解析] 本题考查考生根据上下文确定词义的能力。pity n.憾事,怜悯,同情。第五段提到对外开放竞争既是增强竞争力的方法又有些缺憾。pity后跟了两个that引导的同位语从句,具体解释pity在句中的含义。曼德尔森的实质性建议中,多数是针对如何赢得海外市场而提出的,在欧盟内部依然会是壁垒高筑。
[干扰项分析] A选项是欧洲国家的现状;B选项是曼德尔森的目的而非缺憾;C选项是建议本身,代入原句之后与后面的介宾结构most of his concrete proposals是同义重复,故排除。
单选题 Which of the following could be author's judgment of the strategy?
[A] Infeasible proposal.
[B] A perfect solution.
[C] Effective defense against rivals.
[D] Positive change.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[考点] 事实细节
[解析] 本题考查考生把握作者宏观态度的能力。从文中第三段首句,第四段首句,尤其是最后一段前二句,我们可以看出作者对这个战略的总体评价是积极的。虽然最后一段尾句a pity的内容很容易造成干扰,但不能因为这一个弊端就否定这个战略整体上所做的积极的改变。故D选项正确。
[干扰项分析] 文章中未就可行性进行讨论,所以A选项可以排除。最后一段提到在欧盟内部依然会壁垒高筑,因此也不考虑B选项中的完美方案。该项战略是向其他国家放开竞争,而非限制竞争,因而C选项与原文相反,排除。