阅读理解 Ever since this government's term began, the attitude to teachers has been overshadowed by the mantra that good teachers cannot be rewarded if it means bad teachers are rewarded, too. That's why, despite the obvious need for them, big pay rises have not been awarded to teachers across the board. The latest pay rise was 3.6 percent—mad in the present situation. That's why, as well, the long battle over performance-related pay was fought as teacher numbers slid.
The idea is that some kind of year zero can eventually be achieved whereby all the bad teachers are gone and only the good teachers remain. That is why the government's attempts to relieve the teacher shortage have been so focused on offering incentives to get a new generation of teachers into training. The assumption is that so many of the teachers we have already are bad, that only by starting again can standards be raised.
But the teacher shortage is not caused only because of a lack of new teachers coming into the profession. It is also because teaching has a retention problem with many leaving the profession. These people have their reasons for doing so, which cannot be purely about wanting irresponsibly to "abandon" pupils more permanently. Such an exodus suggests that even beyond the hated union grandstanding, teachers are not happy.
Unions and government appear to be in broad agreement that the shortage of teachers is a parlous state of affairs. Oddly, though, they don't seem entirely to agree that the reasons for this may lie in features of the profession itself and the way it is run. Instead, the government is so suspicious of the idea that teachers may be able to represent themselves, that they have set up the General Teaching Council, a body that will represent teachers whether they want it to or not, and to which they have to pay £25 a year whether they want to or not.
The attitudes of both sides promise to exacerbate rather than solve the problem. Teachers are certainly exacerbating the problem by stressing just how bad things are. Quite a few potential teachers must be put off. And while the government has made quite a success of convincing the public that bad education is almost exclusively linked to bad teachers represented by destructive unions, it also seems appalling that in a survey last year, working hours for primary teachers averaged 53 hours per week, while secondary teachers clocked up 51 hours.
At their spring conferences, the four major teaching unions intend to ballot their members on demanding from government an independent inquiry into working conditions. This follows the McCrone report in Scotland, which produced an agreement to limit hours to 35 per week, with a maximum class contact-time of 22 and a half hours. That sounds most attractive.
单选题 11.It is implied in the first paragraph that a 3.6 percent pay rise is_________.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】推断题。第一段第三句The latest pay rise was 3.6 percent—mad in the present situation.说明了在教师流失的情况下,涨一点点工资太少了。[C]的意思是,太少而没有吸引力,因而正确。[A]的意思是来之不易;其他两项没有根据。
单选题 12.The government makes attractive policies to pull a new generation of teachers into training because it
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】推断题。第一段提出本届政府一直受某一观点的影响,第二段第二句说明,这种观点是采取激励下一代人参加培训,从而建设教师队伍,[C]的意思是,政府认为教师的缺乏是由于新教师缺乏而造成的,符合原文,因而正确。
单选题 13.While admitting the present teacher shortage is a tough problem, the government_________.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】细节题。第四段第二、三句指出,政府不相信是教师职业本身及其管理方式导致教师队伍现在的问题,并不是他们没有努力,因而[B]为正确答案。
单选题 14.An important reason why teachers are leaving their posts is probably related to_________.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】细节题。第五段第四句提到了教师们的工作时间太长,这一调查结果令人震惊,因此推断出[A]“工作时间长”为正确答案。
单选题 15.The word "exacerbate" (Line 1, Para. 5) probably means_________.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】语义题。本句意为:双方对待问题的态度与其说是解决问题,不如说是exacerbate问题,下文提到双方的举动使问题更加恶化,故根据句子结构和上、下文意衔接可推断出,所选单词一定是与解决(问题)相反的词义。[B]“解决”,[C]“夸大”,[D]“确定”,都不符合。故[A]“恶化”为正确答案。