单选题 Bernard Bailyn has recently reinterpreted the early history of the United States by applying new social research findings on the experiences of European migrants. In his reinterpretation, migration becomes the organizing principle for rewriting the history of pre-industrial North America. His approach rests on four separate propositions.
The first of these asserts that residents of early modern England moved regularly about their countryside.- migrating to the New World was simply a "natural spillover". Although at first the colonies held little positive attraction for the English they would rather have stayed home--by the eighteenth century people increasingly migrated to America because they regarded it as the land of opportunity. Secondly, Bailyn holds that, contrary to the notion that used to flourish in American history textbooks, there was never a typical New World community. For example, the economic and demographic character of early New England towns varied considerably.
Bailyn's third proposition suggests two general patterns prevailing among the many thousands of migrants: one group came as indentured servants, another came to acquire land. Surprisingly, Bailyn suggests that those who recruited indentured servants were driving forces of transatlantic migration, These colonial entrepreneurs helped determine the social character of people who came to pre-industrial North America. At first, thousands of unskilled laborers were recruited: by the 1730's, however, American employers demanded skilled workers.
Finally, Bailyn argues that the colonies were a half-civilized hinterland of the European culture system. He is undoubtedly correct to insist that the colonies were part of the Anglo-American empire. But to divide the empire into English core and colonial periphery, as Bailyn does, devalues the achievements of colonial culture. It is true, as Bailyn claims, that high culture in the colonies never matched that in England. But what of seventeenth-century New England, where the settlers created effective laws, built a distinguished university, and published books? Bailyn might respond that New England was exceptional. However, the ideas and institutions developed by New England Puritans had powerful effects on North American culture.
Although Bailyn goes on to apply his approach to some thousands of indentured servants who migrated just prior to the revolution, he fails to link their experience with the political development of the United States. Evidence presented in his work suggests how we might make such a connection. These indentured servants were treated as slaves for the period during which they had sold their time to American employers. It is not surprising that as soon as they served their time they gave up good wages in the cities and headed west to ensure their personal independence by acquiring land. Thus, it is in the west that a peculiarly American political culture began, among colonists who were suspicious of authority and intensely anti-aristocratic.

单选题 The author is primarily concerned with
[A] comparing several current interpretations of early American history.
[B] providing the theoretical framework that is used by most historians in understanding early American history.
[C] refuting an argument about early American history that has been proposed by social historians.
[D] discussing a reinterpretation of early American history that is based on new social research on migration.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[注释] 全文主旨题。本题问:本文作者主要讨论什么?本文是用演绎法写的,因此第1段第1句是全文的主题句:“Bernard Bailyn最近用对欧洲移民经历的新的社会研究发现,重新解释了美国的早期历史。”可见,[D]的表述符合全文主题句的含义。
单选题 It can be inferred from the text that American history textbooks used to assert that
[A] many migrants to colonial North America were nor successful financially.
[B] New England communities were much alike in terms of their economics and demographics.
[C] many migrants to colonial North America failed to maintain ties with their European relations.
[D] the level of literacy in New England communities was very high.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[注释] 推理判断题。本题问:可以从文中推理,美国历史书过去常常主张什么?第2段第3、4句写道:“其次,Bailyn认为,与美国历史教科书中过去一直流行的观念相反,从来也不存在一个典型的新世界社区。例如,早期新英格兰城镇的经济和人口特点差别很大。”由此推理,美国历史教科书过去一直持相反的观点,即新英格兰社区在经济和人口特点方面非常相似。故应选[B]。
注意:推理判断题的命题思路的特征之一就是正话反说、反话正说。
单选题 According to the text, which of the following is true of English migrants to the colonies during the 18th century?
[A] Most of them were farmers rather than trades people or artisans.
[B] Most of them came because they were unable to find work in England.
[C] They expected that the colonies would offer them increased opportunities.
[D] They differed from other English people in that they were willing to travel.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[注释] 细节理解题。本题问:下面哪一点对18世纪向殖民地移民的英国人来说是正确的?第3段第1句写道:“Bailyn的第3个论点提出在千万移民中普遍存在的两种模式:一批人是来当合同工的,而另一批人是来获取土地的。”可见,这两批人都期望殖民地会向他们提供更多的机遇。故应选[C]。[A]“大多数人是农民而不是工匠”与第3段第1句的表述不符,因为此表述中没有说到两批人的人数差异。[B]与[D]文中并未提及。
注意:细节理解题的命题思路之一,是文章中阐述具体细节,而题目中的正确选项则是这些细节的抽象概括。考生务必注意培养对细节的概括能力。
单选题 Which of the following best summarizes the author's evaluation of Bailyn's fourth proposition?
[A] It is totally implausible.
[B] It is partially correct.
[C] It is highly admirable.
[D] It is controversial though persuasive.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[注释] 作者观点题。本题问:下面哪一点概括了作者对Bailyn第4点建议的评价?第4段写道:“Bailyn争辩说,殖民地是欧洲文化体系中的一块半文明的腹地。他无疑正确地认为,殖民地是英美帝国的一部分。但是如Bailyn那样把帝国分为英国核心帝国和殖民地边缘帝国就贬低了殖民地文化所取得的成就。确实,如Bailyn所声称,殖民地的灿烂文化永远也比不上英国的文化。但是17世纪新英格兰的文化怎么样呢?在这里,殖民者制定了有效的法律,建立了一所杰出的大学,并出版了书籍。Bailyn也许会回答说,新英格兰是例外。然而,新英格兰清教徒所提倡的思想和体制却对北美文化产生了有力的影响。”本段中,作者一方面认为Bailyn 有正确的一面,但是另一方面又批驳了他不正确的一面。由此可见,在作者看来Bailyn的论点只有部分是正确的。故应选[B]。
单选题 What does the author think of Bailyn's work?
[A] Bailyn underestimates the effect of Puritan thought on North American culture.
[B] Bailyn overemphasizes the economic dependence of the colonies on Great Britain.
[C] Bailyn's description of colonies as part of an Anglo-American empire is misleading.
[D] Bailyn failed to test his proposition on a specific group of migrants to colonial North America.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[注释] 推理判断题。本题问:作者对Bailyn的工作的评价如何?从39题的注释中我们可以看到,作者认为Bailyn并没有全面认识新英格兰清教徒的思想对北美文化的影响。可见,[A]符合此意。