Generally a saving in energy consumption is insufficient incentive for the consumer to purchase new cooking equipment unless other improvements (e.g. shorter cooking periods, fewer cleaning difficulties and improved appearance) are available as well. For the individual, there is a natural reticence to incur rapid changes because of the valid economic desire to exploit existing capital investment to the maximum: this is the major problem with many proposed energy-thrift measures. However, caterers should appreciate that by reducing energy wastages; they will not only be saving money, but also improving the working environment within their kitchens. Retro-fitting existing cookers with energy-conservation improvements in order to raise achievable efficiencies will occur only rarely. For the most immediate significant impact nationally, with respect to reducing the energy expended upon cooking, better management is recommended. Lawson suggested that about 16 PJ per year could be saved in the British catering sector by adopting improved operational practices. If only 10% of the energy used for catering purposes in the domestic sector could also be saved, overall national savings would amount to approximately 44 PJ per annum. To achieve this aim, a comprehensive and straight-forward program of energy-thrift education for housewives, cooks and kitchen managers is needed. This will require all concerned to exercise considerable personal discipline. The present approach, whereby individuals make purchasing decisions mainly on visual and first-cost grounds-partly because the cooking appliance and food manufacturing industries rarely provide adequate scientific data to support their claims should be supplemented by other considerations. Food is too fundamental to human life, health and happiness to be considered an unworthy subject by intellectuals. For example, even the typical Briton (who tends to be casual about eating compared with most of his foreign counterparts) spends between 5% and 13% of his waking hours preparing, cooking and/or cleaning away after meals. Nevertheless, energy wastage prevails both on a national scale (e.g. storing vast quantities of food at sub-ambient temperatures in so-called food mountains); and on an individual scale (e.g. performing hob operations without placing lids on the pans employed).
单选题
If energy wastages are to be reduced, cooks______.
【正确答案】
D
【答案解析】解析:本题是细节题。参见文章第1段最后一句话:However,caterers should appreciate that by reducing energy wastages;they will not only be saving money,but also improving the working environment within their kitchens.这句话的大意是:伙食管理员应当知道,如果减少能源浪费,厨师们不仅可以省钱,而且可以改善厨房的工作环境。
单选题
What does "reticence" in the first paragraph mean?
【正确答案】
B
【答案解析】解析:本题是细节题。参见文章有关的句子:For the individual,there is a natural reticence to incur rapid changes.对于个人来说,对引起迅速改变会有一种自然的保留。reticence n.沉默寡言,保留。
单选题
Which of the following statements is NOT true according to the text?
单选题
To save energy, cooks and kitchen managers should receive______.
【正确答案】
B
【答案解析】解析:本题是细节题。参见文章第2段最后两句话:To achieve this aim,a comprehensive and straight-forward program of energy-thrift education for housewives,cook and kitchen managers is needed.This will require all concerned to exercise considerable personal discipline.由此可判断正确答案。
单选题
Food is so fundamental to human life that_______.
【正确答案】
D
【答案解析】解析:本题是细节题。参见文章最后一段第2句:Food is too fundamental to human life,health and happiness to be considered an unworthy subject by intellectuals。换言之,食物对于intellectuals来说,是非常重要的题目。