单选题 The usual distinctions between "basic research," "applied research," and "development," used for many years in the formal government statistics kept by the National Science Foundation are, unfortunately, insufficient for discussions of policy for government investment in technical activities. Indeed, definitions are the source of much of the confusion over the appropriate role for government in the national scientific and technical enterprise. One cannot distinguish in any meaningful way "basic" from "applied research" by observing what a scientist is doing.
"Applied research" should not be used to mean "purposeful and demonstrably useful basic research," and one should be wary of the use of the term in government statistics. In corporate research laboratories, such as the T.J. Watson Research Laboratories of IBM, all of the work is referred to simply as "research." There is no need to attempt a distinction between "basic" and "applied" research. All of the company"s research investments are motivated by corporate interests. All of the research has a purpose. All of it is conducted under highly creative conditions. None of it is so "pure" that there are no expectations of value from the research investment.
We should reserve the words "applied research" for those narrowly defined tasks in which limited time and resources are devoted to a specific problem for an identified user who gets all the benefit and should pay all the costs. To make this view of applied research clear in this discussion, I use the words "problem-solving research" instead.
Narrow problem-solving and development are activities initiated by someone who wishes to apply research methods purposefully to exploit an identified opportunity or solve a problem. They involve the application of technical resources to achieve an identified goal for a specified beneficiary, usually the investor in the work. It is a reasonable assumption that those who engage in such activities expect to benefit from them, and to benefit by a sufficient margin over the cost to accommodate the technical risk that is ever-present in research. The investor in problem-solving may be a government agency, but is more likely to be a private firm. In most cases that firm would be expected to be able to appropriate sufficient benefits to need no government subsidy to take those risks.
Public investment in the creation of new technology (technological development, whether by research or as a product of problem-solving) is a critical link between societal goals and the scientific research that is pursued by virtue of society"s commitment to those goals. Thus the desire for technology is an important—perhaps the most important—source of demand for science.
单选题 The distinction between basic and applied researches is thought by the author to be ______
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 第一段提到,对“基础研究”和“应用研究”与“发展”这些词语的基本区分,在国家科学基金会记录的正式的政府数据中已经沿用多年,不幸的是,在讨论政府对技术活动的投资政策时,这些区分显得很不足。的确,在讨论政府在国家科技事业中的合理角色时,对这些词语的界定引起很多混乱。上一句说这些定义不够清楚,下一句说这些定义引起误导。
单选题 A disturbing result of the definitions of nature of research is that ______
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 参阅第一段第二句和上一小题题解。
单选题 It is implied in the second paragraph that basic research is characterized by ______
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 第二段最后三句提到,所有的研究都有一个目的,所有的研究都是在高度创造性的环境下进行的。哪项研究都不是如此“纯”,以至于研究的投资者不指望它有何价值。由此推测,基础研究(即所谓纯科学研究)不在于满足某些人的功利需求,不在于满足一个短期的价值预期。
单选题 The "applied research" as the author understands it is best defined in terms of ______
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 作者在第三段对他所谓的“应用研究”下了一个狭义的定义。“应用研究”指在有限时间内利用有限资源为某个特定使用者完成某个特定任务,作为受益者的使用者获得全部利益,并支付所有研究成本。作者又称之为“以解决问题为目的的研究”。这个定义,以及下一段对这个定义的进一步解释,强调了研究的目的性,当然也强调了解决问题,因此选项A表达的意思是正确的。同时,这个定义也强调了受益者(=投资者),因此B也是正确的。
单选题 The passage is mainly concerned with defining the role of ______
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 第一段前两句实际上表达了本文的主旨。分析“应用研究”的定义也是为了澄清概念,说明政府在研究中的作用。因此最后一段再次指出,对新技术创新进行公共投资(区别于上面提到的私人和公司投资,所谓“公共的”根据上下文实际上指“政府的”)是一个关键环节,将社会目标和为追求这些社会目标所做的科学研究联系在一起。因此,对技术的追求是对科学的追求的一个重要——也许是最重要的源泉。最后一句实际上又强调了应用研究和基础研究的关系。可见,本文的主要意图是如何解决政府在“应用研究”和“基础研究”中的作用。