Owing to the insufficient gas supply in the United States, the gas price has dramatically risen. The new gas price reality and the policy decisions it may trigger will undoubtedly lead to critical financial implications for some individuals or companies, but the situation can hardly be termed a "national crisis" or even a "shortage". What is true is that buyers—particularly those in the chemical industry and in independent power generation will not be able to acquire the quantity of gas they wish at the prices they wish to pay, or even at prices that will allow them to remain competitive in their markets, particularly during peak demand seasons. Over the next year or two, the result will be higher, and more volatile prices, to be sure, but there are market-driven adjustment mechanisms even in the short term, e.g., more electric power from coal and oil, reduced production of domestic chemicals, and a commensurate substitution of imports. Consumers and companies will feel the economic pinch of higher prices; particularly, if we experience an exceptionally hot summer and a winter, when average temperatures were 20% colder than the year before in the Northeast. Still, the United States faces neither the specter of economic recession—at least not solely due to gas prices—nor of freezing families unable to "obtain gas to heat their homes. Given this new price plateau, demand adjustments will also take place and vary across regions of the United States and across industries, with power generation and chemicals perhaps the most affected. Some in those industries may find that their facilities are no longer financially viable at the new price plateau, and there will likely be another round of industrial restructuring not unlike others that have resulted from international differences in resource and labor costs—lest we forget, natural gas is still abundant and very low cost in other countries such as Trinidad, Qatar, and Iran, just as labor is abundant and low cost in China, Indonesia, and parts of Latin America. From a policy perspective, the United States needs to carefully evaluate a series of trade-offs between environmental concerns and economic growth. The gas price experiences of the last two years are the first real tastes of the economic costs of a gas-based environmental strategy. Evaluating these trade-offs needs to be done with a level head and a clear understanding of those trade-offs.
单选题 What is the main topic of the article?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:细节分析。B项在文章的第一段中已经明确地说明。而A项美国的经济由于石油价格的原因遭到了重创,是错误的说法,C项认为美国的经济政策是失败的,这样的说法也是不正确的。D项的说法也不对,石油的价格在未来几年内还会上升,但是这并不能作为全文的主旨,因此也是不合适的。
单选题 What conclusion can we draw from the second paragraph?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:细节分析。在第二段中,作者明确说明石油价格在未来的一两年里还会处于高价和不稳定的状态,因此A的说法是不对的。B认为这个问题可以由电力来解决,也是错误的,因为电作为替代能源只是解决办法之一,并不能完全解决问题。D也是错的,因为文章明确地说明了不会有家庭因为支付不起高价而受冻。
单选题 Which of the following is NOT correct according to the third paragraph?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:细节判断。在中国、印尼和拉美的一些国家,劳动力比较廉价,而不是石油,因此是错误的,其他在文中都有明确地说明。
单选题 What does the underlined word "commensurate" in the second paragraph mean?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】解析:词义推测。根据文章的内容,应该是找到相应的替代产品,所以是A。
单选题 Which of the following is NOT true according to the article?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:细节判断。不但在不同地区,而且在不同行业,这些调整都不尽相同,因此C项的这种说法是不对的。其他三个选项在文章中都有明确说明。