Mounting financial and legal woes are giving Merck a prescription-strength headache. With Chief Executive Officer Ray Gilmartin testifying on Capitol Hill about what Merck knew about Vioxx and when, it is easy to overlook the drug giant"s ongoing efforts to treat and cure disease. Before its stock price sagged 40 percent and both litigators and regulators began circling overhead, Merck invited several journalists to its 415-acre research and development center 30 miles from Philadelphia. As other pharmaceutical investigators can attest, Merck"s 10,000 scientists and support personnel here help explain why new drugs often cost so much. Standing in the middle of his $4 million lab, Dr. Graham Smith points to an LCMS Mass Spectrometer that atomizes test compounds and evaluates them for healing properties. "Of the 1,200 molecules tested here last year," Dr. Smith says, "eight went on to the next step. And not all of those will go on to become drugs." Dr. Smith and his team of analytic chemists fail steadily, on average, for 6 weeks before discovering a potential therapy. Another 32 days usually pass before that happens again. Merck is not alone in throwing most of its darts straight into the floor. According to John T. Kelly, M.D., of the Washington-based Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, "Only 5 in 5,000 compounds that enter preclinical testing make it to human testing. And only 1 of these 5 tested in people is approved for sale. Citing Tufts University data, Dr. Kelly added: "On average, it costs a company $802 million to get one new medicine from the laboratory to US patients. This process normally takes 10 to 15 years." Eliav Bart, M.D., Merck"s senior director for clinical research, works on a vaccine to prevent the Human Papillomavirus. Sooner or later, HPV afflicts 50 to 75 percent of sexually active adults. HPV causes genital warts, as well as cancers of the cervix, vulva and anus. So far, tests have found the vaccine 100 percent effective against HPV 16, one of the virus" particularly menacing strains. None of this comes cheap, either. "Several hundred people are working on this exclusively around the world for Merck," Dr. Barr says. Consequently, the company has built clinics in Iceland, Peru and Thailand. "Merck put equipment in, and we"ll leave it in," Dr. Barr says. This will provide a steady stream of scientific data for obstetricians and gynecologists. Merck also has built a $100 million structure specifically to manufacture the HPV vaccine. If approved, the drug"s price will reflect, in part, this huge up-front investment. But if it fails to secure Food and Drug Administration approval, Merck will be the proud owner of a gleaming, $100 million white elephant. This sunk cost will have to be spread across the rest of Merck"s product line. Alternatively, this money could be subtracted from shareholder dividends, employee salaries, or new research and development. These are lame long term strategies. That, and more, adds up. The vaccine against this ailment is for pharmaceutical companies to teach Americans-starting with Washington"s bipartisan political class—a simple but viral truth: Those little pills do not invent themselves.
单选题 What Dr. Smith says in the third paragraph indicates that
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:推理题。文章第三段提到史密斯博士说:"去年在实验室检验的1200个分子中,有八种进入到下一步的测试。而并非所有这八种都会最终制成药物"。随后又描述了史密斯博士及其研究队伍在发现新的治疗方法上所进行的艰苦努力。由此可推知"要发明一种新药需要花费相当长的时间"最符合题意。其余三项都不能从博士的话中反映出来。
单选题 It can be concluded from the text that
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:推理题。由文章第六段及随后三段可推出"Merck在HPV研究方面投入了大量的人力和资金"是正确的。"有50%到75%的成年人感染了HPV"是不符合文意的,文中只提到不久的将来这么多人可能会感染;"科学家们已发现一种可以完全有效对抗HPV的疫苗",而文中只提到研制出可百分百对抗HPV-16的疫苗,因而该项不正确;"在HPV疫苗上的投资一定可以收回",这种说法太绝对,所以也不正确。
单选题 The term "sunk cost"(Paragraph 9) may probably mean that
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】解析:语义题。结合文章第九段前半部分所提到的美国食物和医药管理机构赞成和反对的两种情况可推知,"无法挽回的成本"意味着"如果没有得到FDA的赞成,Merck的投资将会是一个彻底的失败",即答案选项所表达的内容;"在研究抗HPV疫苗上已浪费了太多的资金"并不能反映"无法挽回的"意思;"对Merck来说要从市场上收回其成本是不可能的",这种说法太绝对,要依照具体情况判断;"投入研究的资金将从股东那儿收回"是说明"无法挽回的成本"可能收回的方式,而并不能说明其具体的意义。
单选题 In the text, the vaccine research against HPV shows that
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:细节题。由文章可以看出,对抗HPV疫苗的研究说明了"创新和高价格总是联系在一起的",即答案选项所表达的意思。因为创新需要花费大量的精力和时间,文中的例子已充分说明了这一点。"医药公司几乎不能从新药中获利"的说法太绝对,每家公司的情况不同,"在一种新药上投入如此多的钱是很浪费的",有时新药的获利也很大,并不能绝对地说其投资是浪费;"美国人应该更注意那些小药丸"并未在文中体现。
单选题 The best title for this text might be
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:主旨题。综观全文,从第二段提出Merck的万名科学家和员工将解释为什么新药会那么昂贵,到随后的各种叙述,都说明了本文的题目应是"为什么新药那么贵"。其他选项都没有准确地体现文章的主旨。