The dot-com collapse may have been a disaster for Wall Street, but here in Silicon Valley, it was a blessing. It was the welcome end to an abnormal condition that very nearly destroyed the area in an overabundance of success. You see, the secret to the Valley"s astounding multiple-decade boom is failure. Failure is what fuels and renews this place. Failure is the foundation for innovation. The valley"s business ecology depends on failure the same way the tree-covered hills around us depend on fire—it wipes out the old growth and creates space for new life. The valley has always been in danger of drowning in the unwelcome waste products of success—too many people, too expensive houses, too much traffic, too little office space and too much money chasing too few startups. Failure is the safety valve, the destructive renewing force that frees up people, ideas and capital and recombines them, creating new revolutions. Consider how the Internet revolution came to be. After half a decade of start-up struggles, for example, hundreds of millions of Hollywood dollars were going up in smoke. It all seemed like a terrible waste, but no one noticed that the collapse left one very important byproduct, a community of laid-off C-H programmers who were now expert in multimedia design, and out on the street looking for the next big thing. These media geeks were the pioneer of the dot-com revolution. They were the Web"s business pioneers, applying their newfound media sensibilities to create one little company after another. Most of these start-ups failed, but even in failure they advanced the new medium of cyberspace. A few geeks, like Silicon Graphics founder Jim Clark, succeeded and utterly changed our lives. In 1994 Clark was unemployed after leaving the company be founded, doggedly trying to develop a new interactive-TV concept. He approached Marc Andreessen, the co-developer of Mosaic, the first widely used Internet browser, in hope of persuading Andreessen to help him design his new system. Instead, Andreessen opened Clark"s eyes to the Web"s potential. Clark promptly tossed his TV plans in the trash, and the two co-founded Netscape, the cornerstone of the consumer Web revolution. Like the interactive-TV refugees and generations of innovators before them, the dot comers are already hatching new companies. Many are revisiting good ideas executed badly in the "90s, while others are striking out into entirely new spaces. This happy chaos is certain to mature into a new order likely to upset an establishment, as it delivers life-changing wonders to the rest of us. But this is just the start, for revolutions give birth to revolutions. So let"s hope for more of Silicon Valley"s successful failures.
单选题 What is implied in the first sentence?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:题干问:"文章第1句暗示的是…"。根据原文第1自然段,作者对比华尔街和硅谷以此暗示"硅谷可能从(华尔街的)失败获得好处",答案选项表达了此意。而选项"硅谷把自己的失败归咎于华尔街的成功","硅谷因其复杂的生态系统而著名"以及"硅谷盲目地骄傲于自己过分的成功"皆不是第1句暗示的中心,不符合题意。
单选题 The most favorable business ecology in Silicon Valley is characterized by
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:题干问:"硅谷企业环境最有利因素的特征是…"。根据原文第2自然段的阐述,它的特征是"它丰富的建设性的失败"。而选项"它的太多的无用的成功","它的对革新的坚强基础"以及"它的解雇的网络设计员"皆不符合题意。
单选题 It can be learned from the text that new start-ups
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】解析:题干问:"从原文可以推出,新新产业…"。根据原文第3自然段的阐述,往往是这些失败让他们获得了原动力,所以新新产业"往往是以失败而告终的"。而选项"遭受到严格的监视","整体上完全垮了"与原文意思相反,以及"从来不考虑失败"皆不符合题意。
单选题 The author writes of the experiences of Jim Clark to demonstrate
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:题干问:"作者写到Jim Clark的经验是为了说明…"。根据原文第4自然段的上下文。作者谈论Jim Clark的经验是为了说明"失败在革新中所起的积极作用"。而选项"一个网络设计师必须经过的艰辛","Clark所碰到的困境"以及"设计员之间的合作"皆不符合题意。
单选题 What the author is trying to suggest may be best interpreted as
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:题干问:"作者写作本文所要表达的是…"。综观全文,作者的目的是说明"有建设性的(成功的)失败是良方",答案选项表达了此意。而选项"有志者事竟成","笑到最后笑得最好"以及"欲速则不达"不是作者所要表达的,皆不符合题意。