单选题
Lacking a cure for AIDS, society must offer education, not
only by public pronouncement but also in classrooms. Those with AIDS or those at
high risk of AIDS suffer prejudice; they are feared by some people who find
living itself unsafe, while others conduct themselves with a "bravado" that
could be fatal. AIDS has afflicted a society already short on humanism,
open-handedness and optimism. Attempts to strike it out with the offending
microbe are not abetted by pre-existing social ills. Such concerns impelled me
to offer the first university level undergraduate AIDS course, with its two
important aims: To address the fact the AIDS is caused by a
virus, not by moral failure of societal collapse. The proper response to AIDS is
compassion coupled with an understanding of the disease itself. We wanted to
foster (help the growth of) the idea of a humane society. To
describe how {{U}}AIDS tests institutions upon which our society rests.{{/U}}
The economy, the political system, science, the legal establishment, the media
and our moral ethical-philosophical attitudes must respond to the disease. Those
responses, whispered, or shrieked, easily accepted or highly controversial, must
be put in order if the nation is to manage AIDS. Scholars have suggested that
how a society deals with the threat of AIDS describes the extent to which that
society has the right to call itself civilized. AIDS, then, is woven into the
tapestry of modern society; in the course of explaining that tapestry, a teacher
realizes that AIDS may bring about changes of historic proportions. Democracy
obliges its educational system to prepare students to become informed citizens,
to join their voices to the public debate inspired by AIDS. Who shall direct
just what resources of manpower and money to the problem of AIDS? Even more
basic, who shall formulate a national policy on AIDS? The educational challenge,
then, is to enlighten the individual and the societal, or public responses to
AIDS.