单选题 {{B}}Text 4{{/B}}
It never rains but it pours. Just as bosses and boards have finally sorted out their worst accounting and compliance troubles, and improved their feeble corporation governance, a new problem threatens to earn them -- especially in American--the sort of nasty headlines that inevitably lead to heads rolling in the executive suite: data insecurity. Left, until now, to odd, low-level IT staff to put right, and seen as a concern only of data-rich industries such as banking, telecoms and air travel, information protection is now high on the boss's agenda in businesses of every variety.
Several massive leakages of customer and employee data this year-- from organizations as diverse as Time Warner, the American defense contractor Science Applications International Corp and even the University of California, Berkeley——have left managers hurriedly peering into their intricate IT systems and business processes in search of potential vulnerabilities.
"Data is becoming an asset which needs to be guarded as much as ally other asset," says Haim Mendelson of Stanford University's business school. "The ability to guard customer data is the key to market value, which the board is responsible for on behalf of shareholders". Indeed, just as there is the concept of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), perhaps it is time for GASP. Generally Accepted Security Practices, suggested Eli Norm of New York's Columbia Business School. "Setting the proper investment level for security, redundancy, and recovery is a management issue, not a technical one." he says.
The mystery is that this should come as a surprise to any boss. Surely it should be obvious to the dimmest executive that trust, that most valuable of economic assets, is easily destroyed and hugely expensive to restore -- and that few things are more likely to destroy trust than a company letting sensitive personal data get into the wrong hands.
The current state of affairs may have been encouraged -- though not justified-- by the lack of legal penalty (in America, but not Europe) for data leakage. Until California recently passed a law, American firms did not have to tell anyone, even the victim, when data went astray. That may change fast: lots of proposed data-security legislation is now doing the rounds in Washington, D.C. Meanwhile, the theft of information about some 40 million credit-card accounts in America, disclosed on June 17th, overshadowed a hugely important decision a day earlier by America's Federal Trade Commission (FTC) that puts corporate America on notice that regulators will act if firms fall to provide adequate data security.
单选题 The statement "It never rains but it pours" is used to introduce ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】推理题。本题有一定难度,要求考生通读全文后再比较各选项才作答。我们通读全文可发现,本文从头到尾都是围绕着“数据泄露与解决方法”这一中心来论述的,因此文章开头的谚语引用显然是为下文的展开作铺垫的,谚语也只是暗示数据泄露的严重。故可断定本题应选的是D。
单选题 According to Paragraph 2, some organizations check their systems to find out ______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】细节题。本题不难。根据原文第2段相关的一句话“... managers hurriedly peering into their intricate IT systems and business processes in search of potential vulnerabilities.”可知,那些组织或其老板们是想找出系统的不足,以采取相关措施来补救。可见,选项A显然符合题意。
单选题 In bringing up the concept of GASP the author is making the point that ______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】推理题。从原文第3段开头引用的言论可以看出,作者是支持这一看法的:数据要像其他资产那样被保护。而且,该段的后半部分也是围绕这个观点进行叙述的,这都证明了作者认为信息保护该得到重视的态度,可见,本题的答案为B。
单选题 According to Paragraph 4, what puzzles the author is that some bosses fail to ______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】推理题。根据题干,可以锁定原文第4段寻求解答。通读全段可以发现,本段阐述的是老板们好像还没觉察到个人数据泄露与诚信易被破坏之间的联系,也就是诚信和数据保护的关系。因此,本题的答案应选A。
单选题 It can be inferred from Paragraph 5 that ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】推理题。根据第5段首句“The current state of affairs may have been encouraged- though not justified— by the lack of legal penalty (in America, but not Europe)for data leakage.”可知,美国目前的状况很可能是因为数据泄露缺乏法律惩罚而造成的。换言之,法律惩罚是对数据泄露的主要解决方法之一。可见。本题选D。