判断题 Servicing manufactured goods Take it back, son LOS ANGELES
On June 8th the Supreme Court ordered Eastman Kodak to stand trial in a
competition case about the repair of expensive photocopiers. It has thrown a
spotlight on the in- creasingly hostile relationship in America between
manufacturing companies and the firms that service and repair the goods which
the manufacturers produce. If firms chose to use an indepen- dent
service company, it is alleged, Kodak refused to supply either the servicing
firm or the customer with spare parts. In effect, Kodak was trying to get
customers to agree not to employ any firms that competed with it for service
contracts on the Kodak machines. Many economists would side with
Kodak, rather than the court. They argue that consumers take servicing costs
into account when buying equipment, so restrictive service agreements are not
neces- sarily anti-competitive as long as there is competition in the equip-
ment market itself. The market for servicing high- technology
electronic products alone is worth roughly $100 billion a year. Thousands of
independent contrac- tors compete for the business, but the lion's share goes to
equipment manufacturers. Roughly a quarter of the revenues of
America's computer makers comes from servicing and maintain- ing the machines
they sell. Profit margins on service contracts can be as high as 50%. That comes
in handy when profit margins on the sale of computers are disappearing because
of recurring price wars. Other industries may also be affected.
Detroit's car makers also backed Kodak. In 1990 the retail market for car parts
was worth $150 billion, about the same as that for new cars. Servicing cars came
to another $100 billion on top of that. Detroit used to be happy to leave the
repair business to morn-and-pop garages. No longer. Many indepen- dent
distributors of spare parts complain that the big car makers are muscling in on
their business. Big manufacturers in Japan and Germany service nearly
all their own products. But America's high job mo- bility and entrepreneurial
traditions have encouraged many engineers in high-tech industries to set up
service firms of their own, often to the fury of their former
employers. Not all manufacturers are keen on the repair and service
business. Makers of cheaper electronic goods, such as washing machines, tele-
visions and video-recorders, find it cheaper and easier to replace faulty
machines with new ones, or encour- age customers to buy a new model, than to
bother with spare parts. But many states in America require that manufacturers
honour warranties on anything they sell. To satisfy the law they have appointed
dealers and service agents. And yet because the manufacturers of electronic
goods now view many of their products as disposable, they are in direct conflict
with the dealers who have to provide service under those warranties.
Decide whether these statements are true (√) or false (×), according to
the article.
判断题
It is alleged that Kodak refused to supply repair firms which competed with them
【正确答案】
A
【答案解析】
判断题
It is generally agreed that Kodak acted unfairly.
【正确答案】
B
【答案解析】
判断题
Most servicing of electronic equipment is done by independent contractors.
【正确答案】
B
【答案解析】
判断题
US computer manufacturers earn about half their income from selling spare parts.
【正确答案】
B
【答案解析】
判断题
Servicing computers is more profitable than selling computers.
【正确答案】
A
【答案解析】
判断题
US car manufacturers earn about half their income from selling spare parts.
【正确答案】
B
【答案解析】
判断题
The number of independent servicing companies is greater in Japan and Germany than in the USA.
【正确答案】
B
【答案解析】
判断题
If cheaper electronic products go wrong, they are more likely to be replaced than repaired.