填空题
·In most of the lines 34-45, there is one extra word. It is either grammatically incorrect or does not fit in with the meaning of the text. Some lines, however, are correct.
·If a line is correct, write CORRECT on your Answer Sheet.
·If there is an extra word in the line, write the extra word in CAPITAL LETTERS on your Answer Sheet.
{{B}}The cost of not training{{/B}}
Training is not a cost. It's an investment. It really doesn't matter that what we pay
for an investment. What is relevant is what we get in return. One of the easiest
34. ways is to put an organisation's future at risk would be to view training primarily as a
35. cost, and therefore provide with substandard training that operates only as a
36. temporary solution. Many companies attempt to quantify the results of training. For
37. example, a person paid ＄50,000 a year who wastes just one hour a day costs the
38. organisation between ＄6,250 per year. So if the organisation sends 25 people for
39. training and they all receive the same benefit, this would equal from ＄156,250
40. savings per year. A few years ago, training, apart from showing employees
41. what the basics of doing the job, was an optional extra for most organisations.
42. Today this is no longer the case. If we, continue doing what we do in the same way,
43. most of us and our organisations will become obsolete within the five years. This is
44. because of our competitors are helping their staff to become more effective through
45. training. They understand that if the real price of not training is the company falling behind as a result.