单选题 They are known as singles, singletons, the never-married, the divorced, and the widowed. What they share is that they are part of the country"s fastest-growing living unit—more than 31 million one-person households in 2010, according to the U. S. Census.
Traditionally, relationship researchers have found that people living alone are on the bottom rung of the wellness ladder. They lack the emotional, financial, and daily help of a committed partner, which are major reasons why people in successful marriages and other strong two-person relationships live better in measures of health, happiness, and longevity.
"When people succeed in having a good intimate relationship, it has so many benefits," says UCLA psychology professor Ben Karney. "Your body works better, your immune system functions better, your body produces more antibodies. Study after study shows that people in good relationships live longer." Even severely ill people who were in good relationships recovered faster and lived longer than comparably ill people who were not in good relationships.
Single men, in particular, take especially poor care of themselves. "Unmarried men are more likely to have bad health habits than married men," says Linda Waite, a sociologist at the University of Chicago. "They drink too much, don"t eat well, don"t wear seat belts" and don"t enjoy the kind of social supports they would in a committed relationship. Single women, by comparison, live better, precisely because they have better social connections and are used to taking care of themselves.
However, many experts say the health and happiness disadvantages of living alone are disappearing. Social science research tends to look at a long-distance rearview mirror, analyzing large groups of people over many, many years. Current trends are easily documented.
"Over the past 30 years, the health gap between the married and never-married has narrowed to almost nothing," says Debra Umberson, a sociologist at the University of Texas. "Being not married has increasingly become an accepted option."
"Once they accept [being unmarried] and make their peace with it, they live just as well as anyone else," says Deb Carr, a Rutgers University sociologist. "We see them expanding their definitions of what is a family. Not only do they have larger numbers of friends [than married people], but they have more frequent contact with them and closer relationships with them." Carr says society has become friendlier to "never marrieds" as well, and that people are more tolerant and supportive of a broad range of different ways people choose to live.
Eric Klinenberg is a sociologist at NYU and author of a recent book about living alone called Going Solo . It supports, if not celebrates, the emergence of the one-person house-hold as an increasingly preferred living choice, not only in the United States but even more so in many Western European nations.
Klinenberg is careful to distinguish among different types of one-person households when assessing their occupants" health and well-being. He also thinks that much of the pro-marriage research is based on either misleading or flawed assumptions.
"Many, if not most, studies of the health consequence of marriage compared currently married people versus never married people," he says. The adverse health consequences of divorce and widowhood are well-documented but are usually viewed separately from the positive health effects of people who remain married. No one gets married thinking the marriage will fail or their spouse will die, Klinenberg notes. And while staying married produces benefits, he says it"s impossible to conclude that simply getting married improves a person"s well-being and longevity compared with staying single.
In looking at the effects of living alone, Klinenberg says, "I make a very careful distinction between living alone, being alone, being isolated, and feeling lonely. These are four different things. And most researchers, even the best of them, mix them together."
In the end, human relationships are the best antidote to the downside effects of living alone. Toni Antonucci, a University of Michigan psychologist and relationship expert, creates an image of people having a social convoy (护卫队) that helps them navigate their life. Keeping that convoy intact is essential for our happiness. People need to realize this and take ownership of their relationships. "We just sort of think happiness comes to us," she says. "We need to rethink that. You can do things to make yourself happier. People should take some responsibility for being happy instead of it being a passive thing."
单选题 Traditionally, relationship researchers hold that people living alone ______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[考点] 细节推断
此题考查考生根据文章具体内容进行细节推断的能力。问题问:人际关系研究人员传统上认为独居的人______。文章第一段提出,独居现象已非常普遍;第二段提出,人际关系研究人员传统上认为,独居的人处于身心健康结构的最底端,从健康、幸福感以及寿命上来说,他们都不如有忠实伴侣的人。由此可以推断,独居的人的整体状况要比有忠实伴侣的人差。所以,本题正确答案是A。
干扰项B:和有忠实伴侣的人一样幸福;干扰项C:和有忠实伴侣的人一样长寿;干扰项D:比有忠实伴侣的人人际关系差。选项B和选项C的内容与原文相反;选项D的内容原文没有提及。
单选题 Which of the following can NOT explain why single females live better than single males?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[考点] 细节判断
此题考查考生根据文章具体内容进行细节判断的能力。问题问:四个选项中,哪一个选项内容不能解释为什么单身女性比单身男性生活得好?文章第四段提出,芝加哥大学社会学家琳达·韦特认为,未婚男性比已婚男性更有可能养成一些不良健康习惯,他们经常酗酒、吃得不好、不系安全带;相反,单身女性却生活得较好,因为她们有更好的社会关系,而且往往能很好地照顾自己。由此可以判断,单身男性对朋友不忠不是文章中提到的单身女性比单身男性生活得好的原因。所以,本题正确答案是C。
干扰项A:单身女性有更好的社会关系;干扰项B:单身女性能很好地照顾自己;干扰项D:单身男性可能会养成一些不良习惯。
单选题 Which of the following is NOT true, according to current findings?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[考点] 正误判断
此题考查考生根据文章具体内容进行正误判断的能力。问题问:根据现在的研究发现,四个选项中哪个选项内容不正确?文章第五段提到,很多专家认为,独居所带来的健康和幸福方面的弊端正在消失。德克萨斯大学社会学家黛布拉·恩伯森说,在过去30年间,已婚人士和不婚人士在健康方面的差异已经减少到几乎没有,不婚这一选择越来越为大家所接受;第五段通过介绍专家的观点提到,一旦人们接受不婚并能和平对待这一选择,他们就能生活得像其他任何人一样好。他们不仅有非常多的朋友,而且同朋友经常联系,保持较为密切的关系。除此之外,社会对不婚族越来越友好,而人们对选择不同的生活方式也越来越包容和支持。由此可以判断,选项B内容与原文不符。所以,本题正确答案是B:不婚已成为一种不可避免的趋势。
干扰项A:单身人士和已婚人士间的差距大大减少;干扰项C:单身人士同朋友保持联系和密切的关系;干扰项D:人们和社会对未婚人士非常包容和支持。
单选题 According to Eric Klinenberg, one noticeable flaw in many studies on the health consequence of marriage is that ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[考点] 细节推断
此题考查考生根据文章具体内容进行细节推断的能力。问题问:艾里克·克兰纳伯格认为,在很多对婚姻健康作用的研究中,一个明显的缺陷是______。文章第九段提出,纽约大学社会学家艾里克·克兰纳伯格教授(在《独行》一书中)评价单身人士的健康和幸福感时,对各种不同形式的单户家庭进行了仔细的区分,并提出,很多支持婚姻的研究都基于一些误导的或有缺陷的假设。文章倒数第二段提出,在如何看待独居的影响这个问题上,克兰纳伯格教授说道,独居、独自一人、离群索居以及感觉孤单是四种不同现象,他对此作了非常详细的划分,而多数研究人员,即使是最优秀的研究人员,却将它们混为一谈。由此可以推断。艾里克·克兰纳伯格教授认为,在很多对婚姻的健康作用的研究中,一个明显的缺陷是,它们没有对各种不同形式的单户家庭进行区分。所以,本题正确答案是D。
干扰项A:它们赞成幸福婚姻的积极作用;B:它们证明了婚姻对于健康的好处;C:它们诱惑了很多人走入婚姻。这三个选项内容原文都没有提及。
单选题 What is essential for people"s happiness, according to Toni Antonucci?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[考点] 细节推断
此题考查考生根据文章具体内容进行细节推断的能力。问题问:托妮·安托露丝认为,对人们的幸福来说至关重要的是什么?文章最后一段提出,人际关系是独居负面影响的最佳解药。密歇根大学心理学家和人际关系专家托妮·安托露丝描绘创建了这样一幅画面:人们由一个社会车队来为他们的生活导航,而保持这个车队的完整对于幸福来说至关重要,人们需要认识到这一点并把握好这些关系。由此可以推断出,托妮·安托露丝教授认为,对人们的幸福来说至关重要的是,保持人际关系的完整。所以,本题正确答案是C。
干扰项A:即便是在逆境中也要保持乐观。这一内容原文没有提及。干扰项B:拥有一个护卫队为自己的生活导航;干扰项D:想象幸福正在到来。选项B和选项D内容与原文不符。
单选题 The word "antidote" in the Last Paragraph most possibly means "______".
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[考点] 词语含义
此题考查考生根据文章具体内容判断词语含义的能力。问题问:文章最后一段中的“antidote”是什么含义?最后一段提出,人际关系是消除独居负面影响的最佳______。密歇根大学心理学家和人际关系专家托妮·安托露丝教授描绘了这样一幅画面:人们由一个社会护卫队来为他们的生活导航,保持这个护卫队的完整对幸福来说至关重要。由此可以推断,要想消除独居的负面影响而保持幸福,就要有完整、良好的人际关系,即人际关系可以最好地解决独居的负面影响这个问题。所以,本题正确答案是B:解决途径。
干扰项A:拒绝;干扰项C:反对;干扰项D:设想。
单选题 In the Last Paragraph "a social convoy" refers to ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[考点] 语义判断
此题考查考生根据文章具体内容进行语义判断的能力。问题问:文章最后一段中“a social convoy”指______。最后一段提出,人际关系是消除独居负面影响的最佳途径,密歇根大学心理学家和人际关系专家托妮·安托露丝教授描绘了这样一幅画面:人们有着一个社会护卫队来为他们的生活导航,保持这个车队的完整对幸福来说至关重要。由此可以推断,安托露丝教授所说的“社会护卫队”指的就是完整的人际关系。所以,本题正确答案是C:社会关系网。
干扰项A:一队社会车辆;干扰项B:一组社会规则;干扰项D:一套社会体系。这三个选项的内容均不符合原文。