问答题 On 1 April 2008, Bagus Bhd sent a notice to its members calling for an extraordinary general meeting to be held on 15 April 2008. At that meeting the following resolutions were passed: (i) A resolution to alter the name of the company from Bagus Bhd to Bintang Bhd. This resolution had the support of 80% of those present and voting. (ii) A resolution to appoint Jambu, aged 73, as a director of the company. This resolution had the support of 70% of those present and voting. Meera, a member, was inadvertently not sent a notice of the meeting. She became aware of the meeting only a week after it was held. She strongly objects to both resolutions. Required: Advise Meera on the following:
问答题 (a) whether the validity of the meeting itself can be challenged on the ground that the requisite notice was not sent to her. (3 marks)
【正确答案】
【答案解析】
问答题 (b) whether the validity of the resolutions passed at the meeting can be challenged on any ground. (7 marks)
【正确答案】
【答案解析】