Cigarette smoking is a health hazard of sufficient importance in the United States. It was 50 years ago this month that America's Surgeon General sounded that warning, marking the beginning of the end of cigarette manufacturing—and of smoking itself—as a respectable activity. Some 20 million Americans have died from the habit since then. But advertising restrictions and smoking bans have had their effect: the proportion of American adults who smoke has dropped from 43% to 18%; smoking rates among teenagers are at a record low. In many other countries the trends are similar. The current Surgeon General, Boris Lushniak, marked the half-century with a report on January 17th, declaring smoking even deadlier than previously thought. He added diabetes, colorectal cancer and other ailments to the list of ills it causes, and promised end-game strategies to extinguish cigarettes altogether. New technologies such as e-cigarettes promise to deliver nicotine less riskily. E-cigarettes give users a hit of vapour infused with nicotine. In America, sales of the manufacturer, who is the fastest e-cigarettes-adopter, have jumped from nearly nothing five years ago to at least 1 billion in 2013. At first, it looked as if e-cigarettes might lure smokers from the big tobacco brands to startups such as NJOY. But tobacco companies have bigger war chests , more knowledge of smokers' habits and better ties to distributors than the newcomers. Some experts reckon Americans will puff more e-cigarettes than normal ones within a decade, but tobacco folk are skeptical. E-cigarettes account for just 1% of America's cigarette market. In Europe 7% of smokers had tried e-cigarettes by 2012 but only 1% kept them up. And no one knows what sort of restrictions regulators will eventually place on reduced risk products, including e-cigarettes. If these companies can manage the transition to less harmful smokes, and convince regulators to be sensible, the tobacco giants could keep up the sort of performance that has made their shares such a fine investment over the years. But some analysts are not so sure. Many tobacco firms are struggling to deliver the consistency of the earnings-per-share model we've seen in the past. If that persists, investors may fall out of love with the industry. A half-century after the Surgeon General' s alarm, they, and hopeless smokers, are its last remaining friends.
单选题 It can be learned from Paragraph 1 that cigarette manufacturing in the United States_____.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:根据题干关键词定位到文章第一段。该段第二句后半部分讲到“其是50年前 的这个月美国卫生部部长发出的警告。这一警告标志着卷烟制造业……不再是一项让人 尊敬的行为”,故D项“曾是一项令人尊敬的行为”与原文相符,为正确答案。A项“十分重 要”是对首句的曲解,且第一段中并没有此信息,故排除。B项“由美国卫生部部长提出”和 C项“开始走下坡路”与首段第二句内容不符,故排除。
单选题 According to the passage, e-cigarettes______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】解析:根据题干关键词定位到第四、五段。第四段首句指出“一些新的技术,比如电子 香烟承诺提供危害风险更小的尼古丁”,A项中的supply和more safely是首句中的deliver 和less riskily的同义替换,故A项为正确答案。B项“帮助最先采用这种方式的厂家获得销 售量10亿倍的增长”与文意“销售量……已经达到至少10亿美元”不符,故排除。C项 “作为一种技术被所有的烟草公司采纳”错在all一词。D项“已经诱导烟民们从大的烟草 品牌转向新兴公司”忽视了原文中修饰成分it looked as if和might,是对原文意思的误解, 故排除。
单选题 The phases "war chests" (Para. 5) most probably means_____.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:根据题干关键词定位到第五段。其中war“战争”和chests“胸部”对考生来说并 不陌生,但war chests的含义需要通过上下文运用排除法来确定。本句将烟草公司和新兴 公司作比较,But表转折,因此考生需要参考前文。第四段讲了运用电子香烟这一技术的新 兴公司销售额激增,故本句涉及的比较,第一个内容可能就是“资金”方面。war chests合在 一起意为“战争基金;(为竞争等筹措的)资金”,故B项为正确答案。A项“空间”、C项“网络” 和D项“竞争者”均不是该词的正确释义,故排除。
单选题 The smokers' attitude toward the consumption of e-cigarettes is_____.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:此题考查作者的态度,根据关键词定位到文章第五段。第三句意为“一些专家 预测在未来的十年里,美国人将消费更多的电子香烟,但是烟民们对此却持怀疑态度”。 doubtful“怀疑的”与文中skeptical意思相符,故D项为正确答案。pessimistic“悲观的”、un certain“不确定的”和optimistic“乐观的”均不符合文意,故排除。
单选题 What is the passage mainly about?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:根据题干关键词需纵观全文。文章前三段讲吸烟的危害在美国引起重视,并加 大了广告限制及禁烟标志力度。第四段引出电子香烟。第五段指出电子香烟所占的市场份 额。后面谈到烟草公司的反应及发展趋势。所以C项“烟草巨头的现状及挑战”为正确答 案。A项“禁烟广告的效力”、B项“美国严苛的烟草监管环境”和D项“电子香烟的引入和 发展”均不符合文意,故排除。