案例分析题

Section B – TWO questions ONLY to be attempted

(a)    Suntory, a private limited company, has two overseas subsidiaries, Maior and Minor. Suntory is based in a country which has a currency of the dollar. Maior is based in Japan where the currency is the yen. Minor is based in Portugal which has the currency of the euro. Suntory and Minor sell golf clothing and Maior sells golf equipment. Maior and Minor are financed by the provision of long-term loans at market interest rates in dollars from Suntory.

Suntory’s sales are mainly in its own jurisdiction, and are priced and collected in dollars. The legal requirements and the business environment in Suntory’s jurisdiction determines the pricing of Suntory’s products. Goods and services are sourced locally and paid in dollars but occasionally the entity trades in small amounts in other currencies.

Maior conducts its business with significant autonomy from Suntory as it manufactures golf equipment which it sells mainly in Japan in yen. Local management determines prices based upon the local legal and business conditions. Most raw materials and labour are sourced from local suppliers with a small amount of specialised equipment sourced from China. Maior sells a small amount of golf clothing, which it purchases from Suntory and pays in dollars.

Minor imports golf clothing manufactured by Suntory and pays Suntory in dollars. All other operating expenses are paid in euros. Suntory gives Minor a discount on the normal selling price of its products. Minor sells its products mainly in Portugal in euros. The local legal and business conditions and the cost of the product from Suntory dictate the pricing of products but all prices have to be agreed by Suntory. At the month end, an intra-group dividend is paid in cash to Suntory in euros which amounts to the net profit made by Minor for the month.

The directors require advice on the determination of each of the functional currencies of Suntory, Maior and Minor. (9 marks)

(b)    On 1 December 2012, Suntory acquired a trademark, Golfo, for a line of golf clothing for $3 million. Initially, Suntory expected to continue marketing and receiving cash flows from the Golfo product-line indefinitely. However, because of the difficulty in determining its useful life, Suntory decided to amortise the trademark over a 10-year life, using the straight-line method. In December 2015, a competitor unexpectedly revealed a technological breakthrough which is expected to result in a product which, when launched, will significantly reduce the demand for the Golfo product-line. The demand for the Golfo product-line is expected to remain high until May 2018, when the competitor is expected to launch its new product.

At 30 November 2016, the end of the financial year, Suntory assessed the recoverable amount of the trademark at $500,000 and intends to continue manufacturing Golfo products until 31 May 2018.

The directors of Suntory require advice as to how to deal with the trademark in the financial statements for the year ended 30 November 2016. (7 marks)

(c)    At 30 November 2016, three people own the shares of Suntory. The finance director owns 60%, and the operations director owns 30%. The third owner is a passive investor who does not help manage the entity. All ordinary shares carry equal voting rights. The wife of the finance director is the sales director of Suntory. Their son is currently undertaking an internship with Suntory and receives a salary of $30,000 per annum, which is normal compensation.

The finance director and sales director have set up an investment company, Baleel. They jointly own Baleel and their shares in Baleel will eventually be transferred to their son when he has finished the internship with Suntory.

In addition, on 1 June 2016 Suntory obtained a bank loan of $500,000 at a fixed interest rate of 6% per annum. The loan is to be repaid on 30 November 2017. Repayment of the principal and interest is secured by a guarantee registered in favour of the bank against the private home of the finance director.

The directors of Suntory require advice on the identification and disclosure of the company’s related parties in preparing its separate financial statements for the year ending 30 November 2016. (7 marks)

Required:

Discuss the advice which should be given to Suntory in each of the above cases with reference to relevant International Financial Reporting Standards.

Note: The mark allocation is shown against each of the three issues above.

Professional marks will be awarded in question 2 for clarity and quality of presentation. (2 marks)

【正确答案】

(a)    IAS 21 The Effects of Changes on Foreign Exchange Rates states that the functional currency is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates, which is normally the one in which it primarily generates and expends cash. An entity’s management should consider the following factors (primary indicators) in determining its functional currency:
– the currency which mainly influences sales prices for goods and services;
– the currency of the country whose competitive forces and regulations mainly determine the sales prices of goods and services; and
– the currency which mainly influences labour, material and other costs of providing goods and services.
Further factors (secondary indicators), which may also provide evidence of an entity’s functional currency, are the currency in which funds from financing activities are generated and in which receipts from operating activities are retained. Other factors include the autonomy of a foreign operation from the reporting entity, the level of transactions between the entities, whether the foreign operation generates sufficient cash flows to meet its debt obligations, and whether its cash flows directly affect those of the reporting entity.
Suntory
It appears that the dollar is the functional currency of Suntory. Suntory’s sales prices are determined by legal requirements and the business environment in its own jurisdiction and the dollar is the currency in which the sales prices are denominated and settled. The operations are sourced locally in dollars. There is a small amount of trading in other currencies and Minor pays a dividend on a monthly basis in euros but the main currency of its operations is the dollar, which indicates that the dollar is the functional currency of the parent. Suntory need not consider the secondary factors.
Maior
The factors in the scenario seem to indicate the yen as being the functional currency of Maior. The sales prices for the subsidiary’s golf equipment are determined by local legal and business conditions in yen. The yen is the currency in which those sales prices are denominated and settled. Some transactions are undertaken with China but these are relatively small. Although Maior sometimes imports and sells its parent’s products, this is only a small part of its business activity. The yen is also used to pay the major operating costs. Thus without evidence to the contrary, the yen is the functional currency of Maior and Maior need not consider the secondary factors.
Minor
Minor imports golf clothing manufactured by Suntory and pays the parent in dollars. Suntory discounts the price paid by Minor for its products, which are sold in euros.
The prices are influenced both by the local legal and business conditions and the cost of the product purchased from Suntory. Also all price changes have to be approved by Suntory. Thus the exchange rate between the dollar and the euro will affect the pricing of the product. All other operating expenses are incurred locally and paid in euros. A dividend amounting to the net profit for the month is paid in euros to Suntory. The determination of the functional currency is not clear-cut.
The euro is the currency in which Minor’s sales prices are set, denominated and settled. However, movements in the exchange rate between the euro and the dollar influence those selling prices. Minor’s sales prices are also affected by the local legal and business conditions in Portugal. The costs of the products from Suntory are influenced by the dollar but all other costs of providing goods are in euros. As a result, the secondary factors should be considered.
Funds from financing activities are generated primarily in dollars and Minor keeps minimal cash reserves because any net profit is transferred to the parent in cash at the end of the month. Consequently, there is some support for the dollar as being the functional currency as Minor is not autonomous, transactions with the parent are a high proportion of the subsidiary’s activities as Suntory is the subsidiary’s only supplier and cash flows from the activities of Minor directly affect the cash flows of Suntory and are readily available for remittance to it. Thus it appears that the dollar is the functional currency of Minor.
(b)    IAS 38 Intangible Assets states that the cost less residual value of an intangible asset with a finite useful life should be amortised on a systematic basis over that life, that the amortisation method should reflect the pattern of benefits and that it should be reviewed at least annually.
The amortisation method should be reviewed at least annually and, if the pattern of consumption of benefits has changed, the amortisation method should be changed prospectively as a change in estimate under IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors. Expected future reductions in sales could be indicative of a higher rate of consumption of the future economic benefits embodied in an asset. Hence, the trademark would be amortised over a 2·5-year period until May 2018
IAS 36 states that an entity should assess at the end of each reporting period whether there is any indication that an asset may be impaired. If any such indication exists, the entity should estimate the recoverable amount of the asset. Irrespective of whether there is any indication of impairment, an entity shall also test an intangible asset with an indefinite useful life or an intangible asset not yet available for use for impairment annually by comparing its carrying amount with its recoverable amount. This impairment test may be performed at any time during an annual period, provided it is performed at the same time every year. Thus, Suntory should test the trademark for impairment.

【答案解析】