单选题
Text 3

Could the bad old days of economic decline be about to return? Since OPEC agreed to supply-cuts in March, the price of crude oil has jumped to almost $26 a barrel, up from less than $10 last December. This near tripling of oil prices calls up scary memories of the 1973 oil shock, when prices quadrupled, and 1979—80, when they also almost tripled. Both previous shocks resulted in double-digit inflation and global economic decline. So where are the headlines warning of gloom and doom this time?
The oil price was given another push up this week when Iraq suspended oil exports. Strengthening economic growth, at the same time as winter grips the northern hemisphere, could push the price higher still in the short term.
Yet there are good reasons to expect the economic consequences now to be less severe than in the 1970s. In most countries the cost of crude oil now accounts for a smaller share of the price of petrol than it did in the 1970s. In Europe, taxes account for up to four-fifths of the retail price, so even quite big changes in the price of crude have a more muted effect on pump prices than in the past.
Rich economies are also less dependent on oil than they were, and so less sensitive to swings in the oil price. Energy conservation, a shift to other fuels and a decline in the importance of heavy, energy-intensive industries have reduced oil consumption. Software, consultancy and mobile telephones use far less oil than steel or car production. For each dollar of GDP (in constant prices) rich economies now use nearly 50% less oil than in 1973. The OECD estimates in its latest Economic Outlook that, if oil prices averaged $22 a barrel for a full year, compared with $13 in 1998, this would increase the oil import bill in rich economies by only 0.25—0.5% of GDP. That is less than one-quarter of the income loss in 1974 or 1980. On the other hand, oil—importing emerging economies—to which heavy industry has shifted—have become more energy—intensive, and so could be more seriously squeezed.
One more reason not to lose sleep over the rise in oil prices is that, unlike the rises in the 1970s, it has not occurred against the background of general commodity-price inflation and global excess demand. A sizable portion of the world is only just emerging from economic decline. The Economist's commodity price index is broadly unchanging from a year ago. In 1973 commodity prices jumped by 70%, and in 1979 by almost 30%.

单选题 The main reason for the latest rise of oil price is______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】细节题。本题问,最近油价上涨的主要原因是什么。文章第一段指出:“自从欧佩克在3月份通过了供求协议,原油已从去年12月每桶不到10美元的价格高升到26美元,油价上涨接近3倍”,所以[B]“供应减少”为正确答案。[A]“全球通货膨胀”与最后一段中提出的“此次油价上涨的背景并不是物价膨胀和全球范围的需求过量”相反;[C]陕速经济增长”和[D]“伊拉克终止石油出口”在第二段提到,但不是主要原因。
单选题 It can be inferred from the text that the retail price of petrol will go up dramatically if______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】细节推理题。本题问,在什么情况下汽油零售价会快速上涨。根据文章第三段“在欧洲,税收对石油零售价的影响占五分之四”,选项[D]“油税上涨”符合文章的意思。[A]“原油价格上涨”与该段“在大多数国家里,现在原油价格中所占的份额比70年代原油所占的价格的份额要小”相反;[B]“物价上涨”和[C]“消费增加”在最后一段提到,但它们是70年代油价上涨的背景。
单选题 The estimates in Economic Outlook show that in rich countries______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】细节题。本题问,《经济嘹望》上的估计表明富裕国家怎样。根据第四段结尾“在经济富足的国家里,石油进口开支增加的数额只是国内生产总值(GDP)的0.25%~0.5%,那还不到1974年或1980年收入损失的四分之一”,所以[D]“油价变化对国内生产总值(GDP)并没有重要影响”为正确答案。
单选题 We can draw a conclusion from the text that______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】推理题。本题问,从本文我们可以得出什么结论。根据第三段第一句“人们有充足的理由来期望,现在油价上涨引起的经济后果不会像70年代那样严重”,选项[A]“使人震惊的油价不再像以前那样另人震惊了”符合原意。[B]“通货膨胀似乎与使人震惊的油价变化无关”与文章内容不符,从最后一段看出,二者是相关的;[C]“能源保护可使油价不涨”没有根据,第四段只是提到能源保护可使石油消费减少;[D]“原油价格的上涨导致重工业的缩减”文中没有提到。
单选题 From the text we can see that the writer seems______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】态度题。本题问,从本文我们可以看出作者态度如何。综观全文,我们看出作者把现在和以前进行了对比,指出油价上涨不会对经济造成重要影响,态度是乐观的,选项[A]为正确答案。[B]“敏感的”、[C]“忧郁的”和[D]“害怕的”均与原文语气不符。