单选题. Accompanying India's industrial transformation has been another revolution of profound significance. A property-owning middle class is not only fuelling a surge of consumption but developing a keen desire to protect its property. Many want better governance and a legal system that protects them. And all but the very riches complain bitterly about a government that, despite strong and growing revenues, has presided over the collapse of affordable health care and education. Farmers want change too. The past few years have seen an upsurge of peasant protest, many of them about the rapid encroachment (侵蚀) of cities into rural land. Millions of farmers have been pushed off their field with little, if any, compensation, and anger is growing. India needs another ownership revolution, this time in the countryside. President A.P.J. Abdul Kalam has set his sights high. Abroad, he wants to convince the world that India's rise poses no threat to other countries. At home, he hopes to create a harmonious society. The Congress meeting late next year will be an important opportunity for him to indicate how the government can give the public a greater say in addressing these growing social problems. And it will be a chance to show the world that against the background of India's remarkable economic change the government is changing too. Political reform matters. Without it, it is hard to imagine how India could make a stable transition to democracy and an unstable India is more likely to pose a threat to the outside world. The American government is trying to persuade India that a rising India and a strong America could not only coexist but thrive together. Reassuringly, at least in its relations with America, India for now seems to be guided more by pragmatism (实用主义) than by competition. And just as reassuringly, America is encouraging it in this. Barring a sharp slowdown in the global economy or some huge crisis at home, India is likely to maintain strong growth for the remainder of this decade. This gives its leaders more leeway (回旋余地) to sort out its banking system, deal with the land-ownership problem, fix health care and education (which will involve big changes in the country's financial system) and set up a credible social-security safety net. If it fails to do so in the next few years, it will store up potential crises for the decade beyond, when India's working-age population will begin to decline and a rapidly aging society will loom closer.1. With the reform in industry, Indian government is ______.
【正确答案】
A
【答案解析】 细节题。本题定位到第一段第三句,许多人希望改善统治,想要保护他们的司法体制。B项没有提到。C项和D项中的all the people与all but the very riches不符。故选A。 印度开展工业改革的同时,另一场具有深远意义的革命也在进行。一个有产业的中产阶级不仅刺激了消费的飙升,而且激起了保护自己财产的强烈愿望。许多人希望改善统治,想要保护他们的司法体制。除了非常富有的人,其他所有人都强烈抱怨:尽管财政收入丰厚且不断增长,政府却眼巴巴地看着本可注资改善的医疗保健和教育体制每况愈下。 农民们也希望变革。过去的几年,农民的抗议这到了高潮,许多人抗议城市迅速侵蚀农村土地。数百万农民被迫离开了自己的土地,得到的补偿即使有的话也很少,怒火正在燃烧。印度需要另一场所有权革命,这次是在农村。 A.P.J. Abdul Kalam总统制定了很高的目标。在国外,他希望让世界相信印度的崛起不会对其他国家形成任何威胁。在国内,他希望建立一个“和谐社会”。明年底召开国会对他来说将是一次重要机会,说明政府在解决日益加剧的社会问题方面将如何赋予公众更多的发言权。这还是向世界展示在印度显著变化的经济背景下政府也在发生变化的一个机会。 政治改革至关重要。没有政治改革,很难想象印度如何才能向民主政治进行平稳的过渡;一个不稳定的印度社会更有可能对外部世界构成威胁。 美国政府正努力使印度相信,一个崛起的印度和一个强大的美国不但能共存而且也能共荣。令人放心的是,目前印度至少在其与美国的关系上的指导思想是实用主义而不是竞争对抗。同样令人放心的是,美国也鼓励印度的这种做法。 印度和可能在这10年的剩余时间里维持这样强劲的增长,除非全球经济的发展突然减速或者国内发生巨大危机。这给予其领导人更多的余地来整理银行体系、处理土地所有权问题、调整其医疗保健和教育体制(这将涉及该国财政制度的重大变化)、建立可靠的社会保障安全网络。假如它在未来的几年中不这样做,就将把潜在的危机储存到下一个10年——那时印度处于工作年龄的人口数量将开始下降,一个迅速老龄化的社会即将出现。