单选题 All over the world, your chances of success in school and life depend more on your family circumstances than on any other factor. By age three, kids with professional parents are already a full year ahead of their poorer peers. They know twice as many words and score 40 points higher on IQ tests. By age 10, the gap is three years. By then, some poor children have not mastered basic reading and math skills, and many never will: this is the age at which failure starts to become irreversible.
A few school systems seem to have figured out how to erase these gaps. Finland ensures that every child completes basic education and meets a rigorous standard. One Finnish district official, asked about the number of children who don"t complete school in her city, replied, "I can tell you their names if you want." In the United States, KIPP charter schools enroll students from the poorest families and ensure that almost every one of them graduates high school 80 percent make it to college.
These success stories offer lessons for the rest of us. First, get children into school early. High-quality preschooling does more for a child"s chances in school and life than any other educational intervention. One study, which began in the 1960s, tracked two groups of students from disadvantaged backgrounds. Some were given the opportunity to attend a high-quality preschool: others were not. Thirty-five years later, the kids who went to preschool were earning more, had better jobs, and were less likely to have been in prison or divorced.
Second, recognize that the average kid spends about half his waking hours up until the age of 18 outside of school—don"t ignore that time. KIPP students spend 60 percent more time in school than the average American student. They arrive earlier, leave later, attend more regularly, and even go to school every other Saturday. Similarly, in 1996, Chile extended its school day to add the equivalent of more than two more years of schooling.
Third, pour lots of effort into training teachers. Studies in the United States have shown that kids with the most effective teachers learn three times as much as those with the least effective. Systems such as Singapore"s are choosy about recruiting; they invest in training and continuing education; they evaluate teachers regularly; and they award bonuses only to the top performers.
单选题 What does the passage mainly discuss?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[考点] 主旨大意
此题考查考生根据文章整体内容总结归纳主题主旨的能力。文章第一段谈到,来自不同家庭背景的学生,其学业上存在明显差异,而且随着年龄的增长,差异越来越明显。文章第二段提出如何消除学生间的差距。第三至第五段提出了具体建议。纵观全文,作者主要谈论的是如何消除学生在学业上的差距。所以,本题正确答案是A。
干扰项B:怎样帮助学生认识尽可能多的单词;干扰项C:如何开发学生的基本学习技能;干扰项D:如何帮助学生学习成功故事的经验。这三个选项的内容原文都没有提及。
单选题 What does "these gaps" (Para. 2) refer to according to the passage?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[考点] 词组含义
此题考查考生根据文章上下文内容判断词组含义的能力。问题问:文章第二段中的词组“these gaps”指的是什么?文章第一段谈到,双职工家庭的孩子从3岁起,就比贫困家庭孩子的学业突出;第二段介绍芬兰和美国一些学校消除这一差距的成功做法。根据上下文,这些差距指的是贫困家庭的孩子和双职工家庭的孩子在学业上的差距。所以本题正确答案是C。
干扰项A:贫困家庭的孩子和双职工家庭的孩子在数学技能上的差距;干扰项B:贫困家庭的孩子和双职工家庭的孩子在阅读技能上的差距;干扰项D:贫困家庭的孩子和双职工家庭的孩子在单词量上的差距。这三个选项的内容都只涉及某一方面,与原文不符。
单选题 What can be inferred from the reply of the Finnish district official?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[考点] 引申推断
此题考查考生根据文章具体内容进行引申推断的能力。问题问:从芬兰那位区政府官员的回答中能得出什么推断?文章第二段提到,芬兰政府消除学生间差距的做法是,确保每个学生都能完成基础教育并达到严格的标准。由此可推断出,当被问及有多少学生无法完成学业时,这位区官员真正想要说的是:没有完成学业的孩子微乎其微。所以本题正确答案是D。
干扰项A:她知道那些不能完成学业的学生的姓名;干扰项B:她能说出那些不能完成学业的学生的姓名;干扰项C:人们想知道那些不能完成学业的学生的姓名。
单选题 The study in Paragraph 3 is intended to demonstrate that ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[考点] 细节推断
此题考查考生根据文章具体内容进行细节推断的能力。问题问:文章第三段提到的那项研究能得出什么推断?文章第三段提到,高质量的学前教育为孩子提供的机会远远多于其他任何的教育方式。20世纪60年代的一项研究,对两组家境不好的孩子进行了追踪。这两组孩子中有部分孩子接受了高质量的学前教育,其余的孩子没有。35年后,曾接受过高质量学前教育的孩子有较高的收入、较好的工作,而他们犯罪或离婚的几率较低。由此可以推断,该项研究旨在证明,让孩子早日接受高质量的学前教育会让他们获益匪浅。所以本题正确答案是C。
干扰项A:家境不好的孩子是研究对象。这是原文中的事实,不是研究想要证明的论点。干扰项B:几乎没有什么学生能接受高质量的学前教育。这一内容不符合原文。干扰项D:高质量的学前教育不应受到干预。这一内容原文没有提及。
单选题 What can be inferred from Paragraph 4?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[考点] 引申推断
此题考查考生根据文章具体内容进行引申推断的能力。问题问:由文章第四段能得出什么推断?第四段谈到,孩子们在18岁之前平均有大约一半的时间都花在校外,这个时间不容忽视。文章接着提到,美国“知识就是力量”计划(KIPP)中特许学校的学生在学校花的时间比其他美国学生平均多60%。文章最后一句谈到,1996年,智利将每天的上课时间加长,相当于延长了两年多的学校教育时间。由此可推断出,学生应该将更多的时间花在学校里。所以本题正确答案是A。
干扰项B:普通孩子花在校内的时间较少;干扰项C:KIPP特许学校的学生在学校花的时间较多;干扰项D:智利的学生多上两年学。选项B和选项D的内容原文没有提及;选项C内容是原文陈述的事实,不是得出的推断。
单选题 Lots of effort should be poured into training teachers because ______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[考点] 细节判断
此题考查考生根据文章具体内容进行细节判断的能力。问题问:应投入大量精力进行教师培训,因为______。文章最后一段提出,在教师培训上应该投入足够的精力。美国的学生已经证明,由最好的老师教出来的孩子所学到的东西是一般的老师教的孩子的三倍。由此可以判断,倾注大量精力进行教师培训的原因是,好老师能让学生受益更多。所以本题正确答案是B。
干扰项A:很多教师没有受过良好的培训;干扰项C:对受过良好培训的教师定期进行考核;干扰项D:受过良好培训的教师不会轻易辞职。这三个选项内容都与原文不符。