Low levels of literacy and numeracy
have a damaging impact on almost every aspect of adults, according to a survey
published yesterday, which offers{{U}} (1) {{/U}}of a developing
underclass. Tests and{{U}} (2) {{/U}}with hundreds of people born in a
week in 1958 graphically illustrated the{{U}} (3) {{/U}}of educational
underachievement. The effects can be seen in unemployment, family{{U}} (4)
{{/U}}, low incomes, depression and social inactivity. Those
who left school at 16 with poor basic skills had been employed for up to four
years less than good readers{{U}} (5) {{/U}}they reached 37. Professor
John Bynner, of City University, who carried the research, said that today’s{{U}}
(6) {{/U}}teenagers would even encounter greater problems because the
supply of{{U}} (7) {{/U}}jobs had shrunk. Almost one
fifth of the 1,700 people interviewed for yesterday’s report had poor literacy
and almost half{{U}} (8) {{/U}}with innumeracy, a proportion{{U}}
(9) {{/U}}other surveys for the Basic Skills Agency. Some could not
read a child’s book, and most found difficult{{U}} (10) {{/U}}written
instruction. Poor readers were twice as likely to be a low wage
and four times likely to live in a household where partners worked. Women in
this{{U}} (11) {{/U}}were five times as likely to be{{U}} (12)
{{/U}}depressed,{{U}} (13) {{/U}}both tended to feel they had no
control over their lives, and to trust others{{U}} (14)
{{/U}}. Those who had low literacy and numeracy were
seldom{{U}} (15) {{/U}}in any community organization and less likely
than others to{{U}} (16) {{/U}}in a general election. There had been
no{{U}} (17) {{/U}}in the literary level of{{U}} (18)
{{/U}}reporting problems. Alan Wells, the agency’s director,
said: “ The results emphasize the dangers of developing an underclass people,
who were out of work,{{U}} (19) {{/U}}depressed and often labeled
themselves as{{U}} (20) {{/U}}. There is a circle of marginalization,
with the dice against these people and their families.”
【答案解析】[解析] 语义衔接题。首先注意所填词与with搭配,排除[A]investigations“调查,研究”,虽与test语义并列,但多与of而不是with搭配;[B]interviews“采访,会见,面试”,interview with sb.“对某人进行采访”,符合语境;[C]conferences“协商,会议”、[D]communications“交流,沟通”这两个词虽然可与with搭配,但与进行调查 (survey)与测试(test)时采取的方式不符。所以本题答案为[B]。
【答案解析】[解析] 语义衔接题。文章主题是读写能力与算术能力偏低造成的不利影响,因此此处所指的teenagers应该是low levels of literacy and numeracy,综合而言,即是“受教育程度低的”,所以选[D]unqualified。[A]illiterate“不识字的,未受过教育的”,没有包括算术能力低的,片面,所以排除;[B]suffering“受苦的,生病的”与[C] poor“贫穷的”,均与语境不符。
【答案解析】[解析] 惯用衔接题。所填词与with搭配,因此限定只能选[A]struggled,struggle with sth.“与…抗争,奋斗”,说明有一半的人存在算术能力差的问题。[B]是强干扰项,但要注意face的用法,与with搭配时,短语为 be faced with,否则直接跟宾语;[C]encountered“遇到”、[D]confronted“面临”,均是及物动词,无需与with搭配。
【正确答案】
B
【答案解析】[解析] 语义、逻辑衔接题。[A]in light of“依据,按照”;[B]in line with“符合,与…相应”;[C]in case of“万一,如果”;[D]in time of“在…的时候”。本句是指两个不同调查(surveys)结果体现的比例相一致,所以[B]正确。
【答案解析】[解析] 语义,惯用衔接题。本题比较简单,掌握四个形近词的意思与搭配即可作答。[A]revolved“围绕,旋转”,多与round搭配使用;[B]dissolved“溶解,解散,解除”,及物动词,dissolve sth. in sth.“将某物溶解于其他物之中”;[C]resolved作“决心,决定”讲时与on搭配,作“解决”讲时为及物动词;[D]involved常与in搭配,表示“牵涉,涉及,包括”,符合句意,为正确答案。