阅读理解 Commuter trains are often stuffy and crowded, and they frequently fail to run on time. As if that were not bad enough, physicist Hondon published a paper that gave commuters yet another reason to feel uncomfortable. Dr. Hondon examined mobile-phone usage in enclosed spaces such as railway carriages, buses and lifts, all of which are, in essence, metal boxes. His model predicted that a large number of passengers crowded together, all talking, sending text messages, or browsing the web on their phones, could produce levels of electromagnetic radiation that exceed international safety standards. That is because the radio waves produced by each phone are reflected off the metal walls of the carriage, bus or lift. Enough radiation escapes to allow the phone to communicate with the network, but the rest fills the inside of the carriage with bouncing microwaves. This sounds worrying. However, in a paper published recently, Jaime Ferrer and Lucas Fernández-Seivane from the University of Oviedo in Spain, dispute Dr. Hondou''s findings. They conclude that the level of radiation is safe after all. In their opinion, while each phone produces radiation that bounces around the car, the passengers absorb some of it, which has the effect of reducing the overall intensity. Dr. Hondon''s model, in short, was valid only in the case of a single passenger sitting in an empty carriage with an active mobile phone on every seat. According to Dr. Ferrer and his colleagues, Dr. Hondon overestimated the level of electromagnetic radiation. When one is sitting on a train, they found, the most important sources of radiation are one''s own phone, and those of one''s immediate neighbours. The radiation from these sources far exceeds that from other phones or from waves bouncing around the carriage. And all these sources together produce a level of radiation within the bounds defined by the ICNIRP, the international body that regulates such matters. People concerned about the effects of mobile-phone radiation are unlikely to take much comfort from Dr. Ferrer''s results. Indeed, Dr. Ferrer says he was surprised at how little research has been done in this area. Yet both Dr. Hondon''s results and Dr. Ferrer''s are based on mathematical models. Their models make assumptions about the physical properties of train carriages and their passengers, and both assume that the radiation is uniformly distributed rather than gathered into "hot spots". But if the debate about the safety of mobile phones is to be resolved, there must be less reliance on models, and more emphasis on hard experimental data.
单选题 Why the paper published by Dr. Hondon makes the commuters worried?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】第二段提到Hondon博士认为,在车厢、电梯这样的封闭空问里使用手机产生的射线会通过墙壁来回反射,危害人体。因此选B。
单选题 Which of the following is the key factor that Dr. Ferrer and his colleagues added when disputing Dr. Hondon''s research?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】第四段提到,乘客本身对射线的吸收会降低其强度。即Hondon博士的模型只在一种情况下有效,那就是空旷的车厢里只坐着一名乘客,而其它的座位上都放置着一部使用中的手机。因此选A.
单选题 What is the commuters'' reaction after learning about the new research by Dr. Ferrer and his colleagues?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】第六段提到,乘客们“are unlikely to take much comfort”(不可能感到太舒服)。因此选C。
单选题 Dr. Hondon''s research and that of Dr. Ferrer share the following similarities EXCEPT_____.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】第七段提到了A、C、D项的这些共同之处,因此只有B项错误。
单选题 What is the author''s attitude toward the research on the effects of mobile-phone radiation?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】文章最后作者提出“there must be less reliance on models,and more emphasis on hard experimental data.”(必须少依赖些模型,多注重些有力的实验数据)。所以作者的态度是D项。