单选题 Pretty in pink: adult women do not remember being so obsessed with the colour, yet it is pervasive in our young girls" lives. It is not that pink is intrinsically bad, but it is such a tiny slice of the rainbow and, though it may celebrate girlhood in one way, it also repeatedly and firmly fuses girls" identity to appearance. Then it presents that connection, even among two-year-olds, between girls as not only innocent but as evidence of innocence. Looking around, I despaired at the singular lack of imagination about girls" lives and interests.
Girls" attraction to pink may seem unavoidable, somehow encoded in their DNA, but according to Jo Paoletti, an associate professor of American Studies, it is not. Children were not colour-coded at all until the early 20th century, in the era before domestic washing machines all babies wore white as a practical matter, since the only way of getting clothes clean was to boil them. What"s more, both boys and girls wore what were thought of as gender-neutral dresses. When nursery colours were introduced, pink was actually considered the more masculine colour, a pastel version of red, which was associated with strength. Blue, with its intimations of the Virgin Mary, constancy and faithfulness, symbolized femininity. It was not until the mid-1980s, when amplifying age and sex differences became a dominant children"s marketing strategy, that pink fully came into its own, when it began to seem inherently attractive to girls, part of what defined them as female, at least for the first few critical years.
I had not realised how profoundly marketing trends dictated our perception of what is natural to kids, including our core beliefs about their psychological development. Take the toddler. I assumed that phase was something experts developed after years of research into children"s behavior: wrong. Turns out, according to Daniel Cook, a historian of childhood consumerism, it was popularized as a marketing trick by clothing manufacturers in the 1930s.
Trade publications counselled department stores that, in order to increase sales, they should create a "third stepping stone" between infant wear and older kids" clothes. It was only after "toddler" became a common shoppers" term that it evolved into a broadly accepted developmental stage. Splitting kids, or adults, into ever-tinier categories has proved a sure-fire way to boost profits. And one of the easiest ways to segment a market is to magnify gender differences—or invent them where they did not previously exist.
单选题 By saying "it is...the rainbow" (Para. 1), the author means pink
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 含义题。从作者的语气“such a tiny slice”,“repeatedly”,及第一段结尾作者的态度“I despaired at the singular lack of imagination”可知,作者认为女生的生活充斥着单一的粉色,既无变化也无新意,粉色的东西不应该是女孩生活的全部,就像彩虹有很多种颜色一样,所有A项符合题意。
单选题 According to Paragraph 2, which of the following is true of colours?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 细节题。根据关键词定位到第二段,由“Blue, ...symbolized femininity”可知蓝色曾经被认为是女孩子的颜色,B项符合题意,故为正确答案。根据文章第二段第一句话,前半部分是说“女孩对于粉色的关注看起来好像是不可避免的,好像基因里就这样决定了”,but之后是对前者的否定,故A项不对;根据第二段的第6行“pink was actually considered the more masculine colour”可以看出C项也不对;根据第二段第4、5行,可以得知,孩子们穿白色是属于以前的情况,并非现在的事实,而D项的时态是指一般现在时,时态不符合。
单选题 The author suggests that our perception of children"s psychological development was much influenced by
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 细节题。根据关键词定位到第三段首句,“我此前一直没有意识到市场趋势对我们关于儿童的天性认知,包括对儿童心理发展的核心认识,造成了多么深刻的影响”,这一句可以明显看出相关儿童市场及其产品在左右人们对儿童心理发展的看法上所起的重要作用。B、C、D项均曲解了原文的意思,只有A项符合文章的意思,故为正确答案。
单选题 We may learn from Paragraph 4 that department stores were advised to
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 细节题。根据关键词定位到原文第四段“splitting kids, or adults, into even-tinier categories has proved a sure-fire way to boost profits”一些商业出版物建议百货商店,要提升销售额,他们需要儿童服装市场。C项将消费者分为更小的群体,符合题意,为正确答案。其他选项不是曲解原文就是没提到,都不符合原文意思。
单选题 It can be concluded that girls" attraction to pink seems to be
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 推断题。最后一段清晰地揭示了粉色“was popularized as a marketing trick by clothing manufactures in the 1930s”,所以女孩们对粉色的痴迷完全是商家主导的潮流。C项“主要受利润驱使的商人们的影响”符合原文,故为正确答案,其他几项均没有原文支撑。