单选题 Have you switched off your computer? How about your television? Your video? Your CD player? And even your coffee percolator? Really switched them off, not just pressed the button on some control panel and left your machine with a telltale bright red light warning you that it is ready to jump back to life at your command? Because if you haven" t, you are one of the guilty people who help pollute the planet. It doesn" t matter if you" ve joined the neighborhood recycling scheme, conscientiously sorted your garbage and avoided driving to work. You still can" t sleep easy while just one of those little red lights is glowing in the dark. The awful truth is that household and office electrical appliances left on stand-by mode are gobbling up energy, even though they are doing absolutely nothing. Some electronic products—such as CD players-—can use almost as much energy on stand-by as they do when running. Others may use a lot less, but as your video player spend far more hours on stand-by than playing anything, the wastage soon adds up. In the US alone, idle electronic devices consume enough energy to power cities with the energy needs of Chicago or London—costing consumers around $ 1 billion a year. Power stations fill the atmosphere with carbon dioxide just to do absolutely nothing. Thoughtless design is partly responsible for the waste. But manufactures only get away with designing products that waste energy this way because consumers are not sensitive enough to the issue. Indeed, while recycling has caught the public imagination, reducing waste has attracted much less attention. But "source reduction" , as the garbage experts like to call the art of not using what you don"t need to use, offers enormous potential for reducing waste of all kinds. With a little intelligent shopping, you can cut waste long before you reach the end of the chain. Packaging remains the big villain. One of the hidden consequences of buying products grown or made all around the world, rather than produced locally, is the huge amount of packaging. To help cut the waste and encourage intelligent manufacturers the simplest trick is to look for ultra-light package. The same arguments apply to the very light but strong plastic bottles that are replacing heavier glass alternatives, thin-walled aluminum cans, and cartons made of composites that wrap up anything drinkable in an ultra-light package. There are hundreds of other tricks you can discuss with colleagues while gathering around the proverbial water cooler—filling up, naturally, your own mug rather than a disposable plastic cup. But you don" t need to go as far as one website which tells you how to give your friends unwrapped Christmas presents. There are limits to source correctness.
单选题 From the first two paragraphs, the author implies that______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:第二段首句提到if you haven’t,此处指第一段提到的没有真正地关闭所有电器,youare one…who help pollute the planet,言外之意是任何污染地球的人都是可耻的,故B项正确。
单选题 The waste caused by household and office electrical appliances on stand-by mode seems to______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:文章第三段指出家用电器和办公用具待机模式时会渐渐消耗掉能量,这是一个awfultruth,通过作者的描写可知,这种awful truth似乎被忽视了,故D项正确。
单选题 By idle electronic devices, the author means those appliances______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】解析:第四段指出idle electronic devices消耗掉的能源可以满足Chicago或London的能源需求,一年就花费了1 billion美元,同时释放出大量的carbon dioxide,由此可知idle elec—tronic devices应指代前文出现的left on stand-by mode,故A项正确。
单选题 Ultra-light packaging______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:第六段提到废物专家将source reduction定义为“不去使用不需要的东西的艺术”,这样可以帮助reducing waste,第七、八段举ultra—light packaging的例子论证了其正确性,故B项正确。
单选题 The conclusion the author is trying to draw is that______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:通过文章末段But…,尤其是末句There are limits to source correctness,可知C项“在环保的使用方法上,没有人绝对正确”符合题意。