单选题
Who's to blame? The trail of responsibility goes beyond poor maintenance of British railways, say industry critics. Stingy governments — both Labor and Tory —have cut down on investments in trains and rails. In the mid-1990s a Conservative government pushed through the sale of the entire subsidy-guzzling rail network. Operating franchises were parceled out among private companies and a separate firm, Railtrack, was awarded ownership of the tracks and stations. In the future, the theory ran back then, the private sector could pay for any improvements— with a little help from the state—and take the blame for any failings. Today surveys show that travelers believe privatization is one of the reasons for the railways' failures. They ask whether the pursuit of profits is compatible with guaranteeing safety. Worse, splitting the network between companies has made coordination nearly impossible. "The railway was torn apart at privatization and the structure that was put in place was ... designed, if we are honest, to maximize the proceeds to the Treasury," said Railtrack boss Gerald Corbett before resigning last month in the wake of the Hatfield crash Generally, the contrasts with mainland Europe are stark. Over the past few decades the Germans, French and Italians have invested 50 percent more than the British in transportation infrastructure. As a result, a web of high-speed trains now crisscrosses the Continent, funded by governments willing to commit state funds to major capital projects. Spain is currently planning 1000 miles of new high-speed track. In France superfast trains already shuttle between all major cities, often on dedicated lines. And in Britain? When the Euro-star trains that link Paris, London and Brussels emerge from the Channel Tunnel onto British soil and join the crowded local network, they must slow down from 186 mph to a maximum of 100 mph — and they usually have to go even slower. For once, the government is listening. After all, commuters are voters, too. In a pre-vote spending spree, the government has committed itself to huge investment in transportation, as well as education and the public health service. Over the next 10 years, the railways should get an extra £60 billion, partly through higher subsidies to the private companies. As Blair acknowledged last month, "Britain has been underinvested in and investment is central to Britain's future. " Yon don't have to tell the 3 million passengers who use the railways every day. Last week trains to Darlington were an hour late — and crawling at Locomotion No. 1 speeds.
单选题
In the first paragraph, the author tries to______.
【正确答案】
A
【答案解析】分析推理题。短文一开篇即用 Who's to blame(是谁的责任)提出问题,由此可判断出短文讨论的是某一问题出现的原因。作者在第一段简要说明了英国铁路私有化的过程,由其中的poor maintenance(养护不够)、stingy government(小气的政府)、take the blame for any failures(承担任何失误的责任)等处即可推知,肯定是英国的铁路出现了某种失误,作者写这篇短文的目的就是分析失误发生的根源(explain the failure to its origin)以及谁应当承担责任的问题,故本题答案就是[A]。其余三项中,[B]中的glorious past(辉煌的过去)、[C]中的argue for(为…辩护)以及[D]中的impartiality(公正)、assessing(评估)都在原文中没有体现。
单选题
Travelers now believe that the root cause for failures of British railway is______.
【正确答案】
B
【答案解析】细节题。对应信息位于第二段第一、二句。第一句直接指出,乘客认为私有化(privatization)是英国铁路失误的原因之一,而第二句又进一步说明,乘客质问追逐利润(the pursuit of profits)与确保安全是否能和谐并存。也就是说,乘客们认为英国铁路的根源在于铁路私有化后铁路公司只顾追逐利润而忽视安全保障,因此本题答案是[B]。其余三项都与此意不符。
单选题
According to Gerald Corbett, British railway is structured______.
【正确答案】
B
【答案解析】词句理解题。本题考查的是对原文第二段第四句引用Gerald Corbett的话中designed…to maximize the proceeds to the Treasury一句的理解。而理解的关键又是proceeds(收益)和Treasury(国库,财政部)两个词。理解了它们,就不难看出Gerald Corbett认为铁路系统是为了最大地保障政府利益而建立的,因此答案就是[B]。其余三项明显都与原文不符。
单选题
Comparing British railway with those of Europe, the author thinks______.
单选题
What does the author think of Blair's acknowledgement?
【正确答案】
D
【答案解析】分析推理题。短文提到Blair的话是在最后一段。首先,不难看出Blair 的话说明的只是作者已经分析过的一种事实;其次,在引用完Blair 的话后,作者指出:You don't have to…who use the railways every day(你无需对每天搭乘火车的300万乘客说),言下之意很明显,那就是Blair的话是空话、废话,没有用。然后,作者又举例说明英国铁路速度慢依然如故。由此即可推断出,作者反感Blair的话,认为那只是没有用处的空话,故本题答案就是[D]:“空话解决不了问题”。其余各项都与此意不符。