单选题Directions: In this section you will read several passages.
Each one is followed by several questions about it. You are to choose ONE best
answer, A. B. C. or D. to each question.
Valentine's Day is tomorrow, and we are all thinking about true love and
heart-shaped chocolate candy. Well, maybe not all of us. Some of us, actually,
are considering the quantifiable aspects of divorce. In America today, some 50
percent of marriages are predicted to end in divorce. And at the University of
Washington in Seattle they say they can tell you exactly—well, almost
exactly—which ones those will be. A psychologist, a
mathematician, and a pathologist have devised what they call a proven
mathematical formula for detecting which relationships will go sour—thereby
holding out hope that such couples can overcome their problems, and avoid
divorce. "We have been able to predict that divorce will happen before [it
does]. That's old news," says John Gottman, emeritus professor of psychology.
"But what we have now is a scientific model for understanding why we can predict
it with such accuracy." The work marks the first time a
mathematic model is being used to understand such deep personal human
interactions, adds James Murray, professor of applied mathematics. "It is
totally objective. And our prediction of which couples would divorce within a
four-year period was 94 percent accurate." This is how it works. Couples face
each other and discuss—each speaking in turn—a subject over which they have
disagreed more than once in the past. They are wired to detect various
physiological data, such as pulse rates, and they're also videotaped. A session
lasts a mere 15 minutes. The research team watches and analyzes the tapes and
data, awarding plus or minus points depending on the type of interactions and
according to a standard scoring system. Everything is then translated into
equations and plotted on a graph, which the researchers have dubbed the "Dow-
Jones Industrial Average for marital conversation". Once this is done, different
situations are simulated and analyzed from the equations and graphs, and
predictions are made. Over the past 16 years more than 700
couples (at different stages of their marriages) took part in the research. But
let's go back a moment. It all starts, say, with a chat about
mothers-in-law—apparently one of the hot topics of contention among couples,
along with money and sex, according to Dr. Murray. "The husband might say to his
wife, 'Your mother really is a pain in the neck.' Well, that's a minus two
points. A shrug, that's a no-no—so minus one. And rolled eyes—very negative,
that's minus two." If however, the husband were to say, "Your mother is a pain
in the neck ... but she is sometimes funny," then, according to the researchers,
you would take away two points and then give one back. If the husband cracked a
smile, he would get another point. At the end of all the additions and
subtractions, a stable marriage is indicated by having five more positive points
than negative ones. Otherwise, warns the team, the marriage is in
trouble. In trouble—but not doomed. The whole point of the
model, says Dr. Gottman, is that it gives therapists new understanding with
which they can help couples overcome patterns of interaction and prevent
divorce. "What we are suggesting," says Murray, "is that couples who take this
experiment then be told the prediction and realize they are going to have to
both change their behavior and repair what is wrong." Not
everyone buys into this model. Bonnie Jacobson, a clinical psychologist and
processor at New York University, says it is "absolutely impossible" to
understand the workings of a relationship via a one-size-fits-all model. "For
mostly every couple I have seen, it's hard to see how they got together in the
first place," she says. "So unless you really get to know the nuanced dynamics,
you will never 'get it' or be able to help." Christine Fasano
was married for only 14 months before getting a divorce last year. She agrees
the dynamics of a relationship are nuanced and complex—but also sees merit in
the University of Washington study's basic assumption that if one looks starkly
at interaction between a couple, it is possible to ascertain whether the
relationship is headed toward demise. "I'm not surprised the model works," she
says. "It's actually not that profound. My basic observation of couples that are
happily married is that they treat each other well. That is basically what they
are saying, and that is hard to argue with." So, any final
advice for Valentine's Day from the divorce research team out in Washington? "I
would never give advice on matters of the heart," says Murray, who,
incidentally, has been married 45 years. "But I suppose the bottom line is, yes,
communication. And being good to one another. That is nice to quantify."
单选题
The mathematical model is designed by these scientists ______.