单选题
In his book The Tipping Point, Malcolm Gladwell
argues that "social epidemics" are driven in large part by the actions of a tiny
minority of special individuals, often called influentials, who are unusually
informed, persuasive, or well connected. The idea is intuitively compelling--we
think we see it happening all the time--but it doesn't explain how ideas
actually spread. The supposed importance of influentials
derives from a plausible-sounding but largely untested theory called the
"two-step flow of communication": Information flows from the media to the
influentials and from them to everyone else. Marketers have embraced the
two-step flow because it suggests that if they can just find and influence the
influentials, those select people will do most of the work for them. The theory
also seems to explain the sudden and unexpected popularity of certain looks,
brands, or neighborhoods. In many such cases, a cursory search for causes finds
that some small group of people was wearing, promoting or developing whatever it
is before anyone else paid attention. Anecdotal evidence of this kind fits
nicely with the idea that only certain special people can drive trends.
In their recent work, however, some researchers have come up
with the finding that influentials have far less impact on social epidemics than
is generally supposed. In fact, they don't seem to be required at all.
The researchers' argument stems from a simple observation
about social influence, with the exception of a few celebrities like Oprah
Winfrey--whose outside presence is primarily a function of media, not
interpersonal influence--even the most influential members of a population
simply don't interact with that many others. Yet it is precisely these
non-celebrity influentials who, according to the two-step-flow theory, are
supposed to drive social epidemics, by influencing their friends and colleagues
directly. For a social epidemic to occur, however, each person so affected must
then influence his or her own acquaintances, who must in turn influence theirs,
and so on; and just how many others pay attention to each of these people has
little to do with the initial influential. If people in the network just two
degrees removed from the initial influential prove resistant, for example, the
cascade of change won't propagate very far or affect many people.
Building on the basic truth about interpersonal influence, the
researchers studied the dynamics of populations, manipulating a number of
variables relating to people's ability to influence others and their tendency to
be influenced.
单选题
By citing the book The Tipping Point the author intends to ______.
A. analyze the consequences of social epidemics
B. discuss influentials' function in spreading ideas
C. exemplify people's intuitive response, to social epidemics
D. describe the essential characteristics of influentials
单选题
What is the essential element in the dynamics of social influence?
A. The eagerness to be accepted
B. The impulse to influence others
C. The readiness to be influenced
D. The inclination to rely on others
【正确答案】
C
【答案解析】[解析] 根据题干中的dynamics of social influence,可以定位于最后一段。
[解析] 文章最后一段提到dynamics of populations时指出,该研究掌握了一系列的变化,该变化包括人们影响他人的能力,以及被他人影响的趋势。故选C。
[避错] 选项A:被接受的渴望。文章中没有提及。选项B:想要影响他人的冲动。不准确,文章中说的是影响他人的能力。选项D:依赖他人的倾向。文章中没有提及。
[点睛] 正确选项中的readiness是对原文中tendency的同义转述。