单选题 Section B
Directions: In this section, you are required to read one quoted blog and the comments on it.The blog and comments are followed by questions or unfinished statements, each with four suggested answers A,B, C and D.Choose the best answer and mark your answer on the Answer Sheet.
I am starting to worry about the electric car.Not the thing itself; I’ve found electric vehicles to be superior to their fossil-powered predecessors in just about every important way, and although I am a car-crazy Californian, I don’t expect to buy a lung-destroying, pollution-spewing gas car ever again.
But electric motors are merely a power source, not a panacea.From General Motors’ Super Bowl ads to President Biden’s climate-change plans, plug-in cars are now being cast as a central player in America’s response to a warming future—turning a perfectly reasonable technological hope into overblown hype.
The planet will be much better off if we switch to electric cars.But gauzy visions of the guilt- free highways of tomorrow could easily distract us from the larger and more entrenched problem with America’s transportation system.
That problem isn’t just gas-fueled cars but car-fueled lives—a view of the world in which huge private automobiles are the default methods of getting around.In this way E.V.s represent a very American answer to climate change: To deal with an expensive, dangerous, extremely resource-intensive machine that has helped bring about the destruction of the planet, let’s all buy this new version, which runs on a different fuel.
During his time as mayor of South Bend, Ind., Pete Buttigieg, the new secretary of transportation, advocated plans to reduce car dependency.But asking Americans to begin to imagine a future of fewer, smaller cars and less driving will be a great political heave.I can already imagine the Fox News segments pillorying Biden and Mayor Pete for their “war” on S.U.V.s and pickup trucks.
Comment 1:
When gasoline prices hit $200.00 a gallon, we were gonna quit driving and just WALK everywhere.
Comment 2:
We support and encourage many planet-saving carbon offset projects worldwide.These include forest regeneration and protection activities designed to save the world’s precious natural resources.Your support makes a significant difference in the fight against climate change and global warming.
Comment 3:
An objection to the clean, eco-friendly image of electric cars is the effects of electric car battery pollution.Electric car batteries are composed of various rare earth materials.The extraction, manipulation, and disposal of such materials can contribute to carbon emissions and air and water pollution.How does the electric car pollute the environment according to Comment 3?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】评论3提到,对于电动汽车的清洁、环保形象,有异议提出电动汽车电池会对环境产生污染。电动汽车材料的提取、操作和处理会导致碳排放、空气和水污染。由此可知该评论认为电动汽车的电池会对环境产生污染。故D选项正确。A、B、C选项均不符合评论者表达的主要观点,故排除。
【全文翻译】
  我开始担心电动汽车了。不是电动车本身;我发现电动汽车在几乎所有重要方面都优于化石燃料汽车,尽管我是一个汽车迷,但我不指望再买一辆损坏肺部健康、排放污染的汽油汽车了。
  但电动机只是一种动力来源,不是万灵药。从通用汽车的超级广告到拜登总统的气候变化计划,插电式汽车现在被塑造成美国应对未来气候变暖的核心角色——把一个完全合理的技术希望变成了夸大其词的炒作。
  如果我们改用电动汽车,地球将变得更好。但是,对未来没有负罪感的高速公路的模糊愿景,很容易让我们忽视美国交通系统中更严重、更根深蒂固的问题。
  这个问题不仅仅是燃油汽车,还有以汽车为燃料的生活——在这个世界上,大型私人汽车是人们出行的默认方式。因此,电动汽车代表了一种非常美国式的应对气候变化的方法:为了对付这种昂贵、危险、极其消耗资源且破坏地球环境的燃油汽车,让我们都购买电动汽车。
  在担任印第安纳州南本德市市长期间,新任交通部长皮特·布蒂吉格提倡减少对汽车的依赖。但是,要求美国人想象一个汽车更少、更小、驾驶更少的未来,这将是一个巨大的政治阻力。我已经可以想象,福克斯新闻片段会嘲笑拜登和皮特市长对越野车和皮卡的“战争”。
  评论1:
  当油价涨到每加仑200美元的时候,我们就不开车,到哪里都步行。
  评论2:
  我们支持和鼓励世界各地节约地球的碳抵消项目。其中包括森林再建和保护世界珍贵资源的活动。你们的支持对应对气候变化和全球变暖具有重大意义。
  评论3:
  对于电动汽车的清洁、环保形象,有异议提出电动汽车电池会对环境产生污染。电动汽车电池由多种稀土材料组成。这些材料的提取、操作和处理会导致碳排放、空气和水污染。