单选题 The clean-energy business is turning into the next big investment boom, in which risks are lightly ignored. Until recently, recalls Charlie Gay, a 30-year veteran of the solar-power business, venture capitalists were far too busy catering to captains of the information-technology industry to waste time on "hippy-dippy tree-huggers" like himself. But now the tree-huggers are in the ascendant and the IT barons are busy investing in clean-energy technology.
Investors are failing over themselves to finance start-ups in clean technology, especially in energy. Venture Business Research reckons that investment in the field by venture capitalists and private-equity firms has quadrupled in the past two years, from some $500m in 2004 to almost $2 billion so far this year. The share of venture capital going into clean energy is rising rapidly.
Clean-energy fever is being fuelled by three things: high oil prices, fears over energy security and a growing concern about global warming. The provision of energy, the industry"s cheerleaders say, will change radically over the coming decades. Polluting coal and gas-fired power stations will give way to cleaner alternatives such as solar and wind; fuels derived from plants and waste will replace petrol and diesel; and small, local forms of electricity generation will replace big power stations feeding far-flung grids. Eventually, it is hoped, fuel cells running on hydrogen will take the place of the internal combustion engine which is available everywhere. It is a bold vision, but if it happens very slowly, or only to a limited extent, boosters argue that it will still prompt tremendous growth for firms in the business.
Analysts confidently predict the clean-energy business will grow by 20%~30% a year for a decade. Jefferies, an investment bank that organized a recent conference on the industry in London, asked participants how soon solar power would become competitive with old-fashioned generation technologies: in 2010, 2015 or 2020. About three-quarters of those present, one visitor happily observed, were "cheque-writers". This "megatrend", the keynote speaker advocated, "may be the biggest job and wealth-creation opportunity of the 21st century."
Such exaggeration might remind people of dotcom bubble. But clean-energy advocates insist growth is sustainable because of the likes of Mr. Schwarzenegger. The Governor is a hero in green circles because of his enthusiasm for environmental regulation. He easily won reelection partly because he seized on global warming as a concern and signed into law—America"s first wide-ranging scheme to cap green-house-gas emissions.
单选题 According to the first two paragraphs, we can learn that ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 段落推断题。根据前两段,投资者们对清洁能源行业的投资成倍增长,改变了风险投资市场,因此选C项。A项说清洁能源的风险完全被忽略,而原文说的是lightly ignored,因此A项错误;B项中的waste money没有在文中提及:文中只是说到了环保主义者势力渐强,并没有说IT业相应地萎缩了,因此B项也不正确;D项说IT产业会相应地萎缩,文中未提到。
单选题 Which of the following is TRUE of Para. 3?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 事实细节题。第三段段尾提到,支持者认为,它仍将激发该行业公司的巨大增长,可推知正确答案为D项。A项“人类的心理弱点”无中生有,属过度推断;B项属强干扰项,事实上,这只是清洁能源业的cheerleaders的看法:文中说的是氢燃料将取代内燃机,因此C项亦可排除。
单选题 The word "cheque-writers" (Line 5, Para. 4) is closest in meaning to ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 词义理解题。A、D项词义重合,可排除。第四段提到的这次大会是投资银行组织的关于清洁能源的讨论会,因此可推知与会者是投资者,而不是捐助者或慈善家,故选C项。
单选题 It can be inferred from the last paragraph that ______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 推理判断题。最后一段提到,该行业的投资热让人想起了网络业的泡沫,说明网络行业曾增长迅猛,但很快如泡沫般破碎了,因此B项正确。文中没提到行业模式,A项错误;文中说的是施瓦辛格之类的政治家支持清洁能源,所以支持者们才会认为该行业发展是可持续的,而不是施瓦辛格本身坚持说该行业的发展是可持续的,因此C项错误;D项说全球变暖问题在政治选举中是普遍话题且起决定性的作用,这只是美国加州的事实,并不具普遍意义,且文中也没有提及全球变暖在选举中的作用,因此D项属过度推断。
单选题 What is the author"s attitude towards clean energy business?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 观点态度题。通观全文,既有对该行业蓬勃发展的描述,陈述了充满信心的支持者们的观点,也提到了目前这股投资热是“夸张的”和“大胆的”。因此作者的态度应当是客观的。选C项。