Whether or not animals feel is not altogether an easy question to answer. A human being has direct awareness only of the pains which he himself suffers. Our knowledge of the pains even of other human beings is only an inference from their words, and to a lesser extent their behaviors. Animals cannot tell us what they feel. We can, of course, study their bodily reactions to the kind of stimuli which would be painful to human beings and this has often been done. When such stimuli are applied to animals, their pupils dilate, their pulse rate and blood pressure rise, they may withdraw the stimulated limb and they may make struggling movements. Nevertheless it has been pointed out that none of these reactions can safely be taken as indications that the animal experiences pain because they can all be evoked when the parts of the body stimulated have been isolated from the higher nervous centres. Furthermore, when disease produces such an isolation in human beings the corresponding stimuli are painless. We must therefore look for other evidence as the capacity of animals to experience pain. Basically, all the nervous elements which underlie the experience of pain by human beings are to be found in all mammalian vertebrates at least; this is hardly surprising as pain is a response to a potentially harmful stimulus and is therefore of great biological importance for survival. Is there any reason, then, for supposing that animals, though equipped with all the necessary neurological structures, do not experience pain? Such a view would seem to presuppose a profound qualitative difference in the mental life of animals and men. The difference between the human and subhuman nervous system lies chiefly in the much greater development of the human forebrain. This would be significant in the present context only if there were reason to believe that it alone was correlated with the occurrence of conscious experiences. But much of our knowledge of the nervous regulation of consciousness is derived from experiments on animals. In everyday life we take it for granted that animals see and hear, and there seems no reason to suppose that they do not feel pain. So, while the reactions of the pupils, pulse rate and blood pressure mentioned above can in exceptional circumstances occur without the conscious experience of pain, it seems likely that in the intact animal they are indications that pain is being experienced.
单选题 Our knowledge of the pains animals feel can be obtained through
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:细节题。文章第一段提到:动物不能告诉我们它们的感受,我们可以通过研究它们怎样对使人产生痛觉的刺激物做出反应来获知这一点。由此可知"研究它们对产生疼痛的刺激物的反应"符合文意。"从其言语中推断","研究它们对疼痛的直接意识"和"从其行为中推断"均不是文章中提到的方法。
单选题 Pain is vital to the survival of human being and all mammalian because
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:细节题。文章第二段开头部分论证了疼痛具有使动物生存下去的生物意义;疼痛是对潜在的危险刺激物的反应。两者由therefore"因此"连接,为因果关系,所以"它是对危险刺激物的反应"符合文意。"它能在脊椎动物中找到","它包含神经要素"和"它构成精神生活的基础"都不符合文章的意思。
单选题 The human nervous system differs from that of animals in that
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】解析:细节题。文章第二段中间部分明确指出人类的神经系统与低于人类的神经系统的区别主要在于人类有相当发达的前脑,而动物神经系统属于低于人类的神经系统,所以"人类有更发达的前脑"符合文意。"人类能感觉到疼痛而动物不能"与本文主旨相矛盾,"人类有着不同的神经系统结构"是对题意的重复,"人类的精神生活在本质上与动物的不同"是对原文细节的歪曲。
单选题 We can conclude from the last paragraph that
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:推理题。文章最后一段第一句话提到"日常生活中我们把动物能听能看当作理所当然的事",由此可得出结论:人们对这一事实是普遍接受的,所以答案选项正确。接下来作者讲到瞳孔的反应有时在没有痛感时发生,所以"瞳孔的反应与疼痛有关"过于绝对;"动物在个别情况下感到疼痛"并未在文中提及;"动物没有痛觉的假设是合理的"与原文意思相反。
单选题 The author seems to agree that
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】解析:主旨题。在文章的结论部分,作者指出"瞳孔、脉搏和血压的反应只有个别情况下是在没有经历痛感时发生,在未受损动物身上这些反应表明它们在经历疼痛"。因此,作者的观点应为"动物可能会感觉到疼痛"。"只有人类能感觉疼痛"与本文主旨相反,"我们不能判定疼痛对动物意味着什么"和"人类能从动物那里学会避免疼痛"未在文中涉及,也不是可以直接推出的结论。