单选题 Cannes was quiet this week. Although the stars and the paparazzi went through the usual red-carpet routine, there was less extravagance and a smaller contingent of film-buyers than usual. Yet for makers of independent films, that was not the end of the world. In their business the action increasingly takes place not on the French Riviera but in American living rooms. Tricky, intelligent films are finding a home in the least glamorous corner of the television business.
Getting independent films into cinemas, never easy, has become much harder in the past year. Some specialist distributors, such as Warner Independent Pictures, have closed and others are buying fewer films. The credit crunch and the strong dollar have cut foreign sales. Meanwhile cheap digital-video cameras and editing software have produced a flood of content. Some 5,500 films are chasing buyers in Cannes this year. Last year just 606 new films were released in American cinemas. Many lost money. "The economics just do not make sense," says Jonathan Sehring of IFC Films, an independent distributor.
Hence the rapid growth of an alternative. This year IFC will release about 100 films "on demand", meaning they can be called up for a fee in most households that get their television via cable or satellite. Many will be available on the same day that they first appear at film festivals such as Sundance and South by Southwest. Later this year IFC plans to launch a new on-demand channel to showcase documentary films. Cinetic, a powerful independent-film broker, will also get into the game this summer.
The reason for the rush is that, for low-budget films, the economics of video on demand do make sense. Cable companies, which take a cut when they sell a film, help with advertising. Mr Sehring says IFC makes about as much when a film is sold on demand as when a customer buys a cinema ticket, even though the ticket costs almost twice as much. He reckons he recoups his costs and returns money to filmmakers more than half the time—not bad for films that might otherwise have disappeared without trace.
Distributors are learning what kinds of films are best suited to video on demand. Whether accessed via cable television or the Internet, video on demand is likely to grow. America"s suburbs are becoming much more diverse places, with more ethnic minorities, more people with degrees and more gays, according to Gary Gates, a demographer at the University of California, Los Angeles. The potential audience for independent films is thus dispersing beyond the places where independent cinemas are concentrated. Not everybody lives near an art-house cinema, but almost everybody has a remote control.
单选题 From the first paragraph we know that ______
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 第一段提到今年电影业不景气,买片子的人少了。但独立电影制片商的商业活动从French Riviera搬到了美国人的起居室里。French Riviera指法国东南部地中海沿岸地区,举办著名电影节的戛纳就位于这个区域。根据下文,这句话的意思是:虽然独立制片人没有在戛纳电影节上卖掉很多片子,但是他们开拓的电视视频点播业务(点播电影可以坐在起居室里用遥控器完成)却为他们挣到了钱。第一段最后一句大概也是这个意思。
单选题 Which of the following factors has caused filmmakers to sell fewer films?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 第二段提到了几个原因,一是信贷危机,二是美元升值,三是制作器械和软件成本降低,使得电影制作泛滥。可见,只有选择项B表达的内容被提到了,其他均没有提到。
单选题 In the first sentence of the third paragraph, the "alternative" refers to ______
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 第三段和下文主要介绍了通过在电视上开办影片点播节目来挣钱的做法。这里所谓an alternative,是针对把影片售给影院放映的传统方法而言。本段下文和第四段提到,这种新方法不仅推出电影的速度快,而且收回成本快,比卖给电影院挣钱也不少。
单选题 Which of the following would not benefit from video on demand?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 第四段提到,有线电视公司可能从点播节目业务中挣到钱(选择项A表达的内容),像IFC这样的独立经销商也能挣到钱(选择项C表达的内容)。随着经销商和有线电视公司收回成本把钱还给制片商,制片商也能挣到钱(选择项B表达的内容)。由于电影不再在电影院中放映,因此电影院可能成为这种新业务的受害者。
单选题 It is implied that the boom of the independent films ______
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 最后一段提到,美国的郊区越来越多样化,住着各色人群,人们的兴趣各异,因此欣赏电影的品位各有不同,走入同一个电影院观看同一部电影的可能性不大。而另一方面,点播节目却可以允许观众按自己的兴趣和品味点播自己的节目。另外,不是所有的人都住在电影院附近,看电影不一定方便,而在电视上点播节目就不受地点和时间的限制。