阅读理解 Lonely people, it seems, are at greater risk than the gregarious of developing illnesses associated with chronic inflammation, such as heart disease and certain cancers. A paper published last year in the Public Library of Science, Medicine, shows the effect on mortality of loneliness is comparable with that of smoking and drinking after examining the results of 148 previous studies and controlled for factors such as age and pre-existing illness.
Steven Cole of the University of California, Los Angeles, thinks he may know why this is so. He told the American Association for the Advancement of Science meeting in Washington, D.C., about his work studying the expression of genes in lonely people. Dr. Cole harvested samples of white blood cells from both lonely and gregarious people. He then analysed the activity of their genes, as measured by the production of a substance called messenger RNA. This molecule carries instructions from the genes telling a cell which proteins to make. The level of messenger RNA from most genes was the same in both types of people. There were several dozen genes, however, that were less active in the lonely, and several dozen others that were more active. Moreover, both the less active and the more active gene types came from a small number of functional groups.
Broadly speaking, the genes less active in the lonely were those involved in staving off viral infections. Those that were more active were involved in protecting against bacteria. Dr. Cole suspects this could help explain not only why the lonely are iller, but how, in evolutionary terms, this odd state of affairs has come about.
The crucial bit of the puzzle is that viruses have to be caught from another infected individual and they are usually species-specific. Bacteria, in contrast, often just lurk in the environment, and may thrive on many hosts. The gregarious are therefore at greater risk than the lonely of catching viruses, and Dr. Cole thus suggests that past evolution has created a mechanism which causes white cells to respond appropriately. Conversely, the lonely are better off ramping up their protection against bacterial infection, which is a bigger relative risk to them.
What Dr. Cole seems to have revealed, then, is a mechanism by which social environment reaches inside a person's body and tweaks its genome so that it responds appropriately. It is not that the lonely and the gregarious are genetically different from each other. Rather, their genes are regulated differently, according to how sociable an individual is. Dr. Cole thinks this regulation is part of a wider mechanism that tunes individuals to the circumstances they find themselves in.

单选题 What risk may lonely people run according to the first paragraph?

【正确答案】 C

【答案解析】细节题。根据题干信息定位到第一段。本段主要介绍了《科学公共图书馆——医学》上一篇论文的观点，与爱交际的人相比，孤独的人似乎患与慢性炎症相关的疾病的风险更大，孤独对死亡率的影响能与抽烟和酗酒相提并论。由此可见，C项“他们可能成为慢性疾病的受害者”符合题意，故本题选C。A项与首句描述相矛盾。虽然第一段最后出现了age和illness，但是指论文中所说的研究控制了年龄和已患疾病等因素，故排除B项和D项。

单选题 Dr. Cole made an analysis of the activity of the genes by______.

【正确答案】 A

【答案解析】细节题。根据原文第二段中的“Dr．Cole harvested samples of white blood cells from both lonely and gregarious people．He then analysed the activity of their genes，as measured by the production of a substance called messenger RNA．”可知Cole博士从孤独的人和爱交际的人那里收集了白细胞样本，然后靠测量一种叫作信使RNA的物质的数量分析了他们基因的活跃度，或者说通过测量信使RNA的含量来分析基因活跃度，故A项符合题意。B项和D项在原文中没有提及，可排除。原文提到的是信使RNA携带着基因上的指令，这些指令告诉细胞生产哪类蛋白质，显然这是对信使RNA的介绍，并不是分析基因活跃度的方法，故C项“对合成某种蛋白质下达指令”错误。

单选题 Broadly speaking, the genes more active in the lonely______.

【正确答案】 B

【答案解析】细节题。根据原文第三段中的“Broadly speaking，the genes less active in the lonely were those involved in staving off viral infections．Those that were more active were involved in protecting against bacteria．”可知，孤独的人体内不太活跃的基因是那些帮助人们避开病毒感染的基因，而那些较活跃的基因帮助人们抵抗细菌。故本题选B。文中提到避开病毒感染的基因是孤独的人体内活跃度较低的基因，故排除A项。第二段末句说无论是活跃度较高的基因还是活跃度较低的基因都来自少数功能群，与C项矛盾。D项在原文未提及，故排除。

单选题 What can we know about viruses and bacteria from the fourth paragraph?

【正确答案】 D

【答案解析】细节题。根据原文第四段中的“The crucial bit ofthe puzzle is that viruses have to be caught from another infected individual…Dr．Cole thus suggests that past evolution has created a mechanism which causes white cells to respond appropriately.”可知，病毒通过另一个已感染此病毒的人传染给某个人，并且病毒通常有其一对一的特殊宿主。相比之下，细菌经常仅仅潜伏在周围的环境中，并且宿主众多。所以爱交际的人比孤独的人更易感染病毒。由此可见，病毒较之细菌对爱交际的人的威胁更大，故本题选D。原文提到经常潜伏在周围环境中的是细菌，而不是病毒，故A项错误。B项描述的是病毒的传染方式。C项与原文中的“The gregarious are therefore at greater risk than the lonely of catching viruses”描述矛盾。

单选题 What message does Dr. Cole seem to convey by the mechanism?

【正确答案】 B

【答案解析】推断题。根据原文最后一段中的“What Dr．Cole seems to have revealed，then，is a mechanism…their genes are regulated differently, according to how sociable an individual is．”可知，Cole博士似乎已经揭示出这样一种机制，社交环境可以影响人们体内的生化活动，调整人体内的基因组以让其做出恰当的反应。这并非说孤独的人和爱交际的人在基因上有所不同，而是根据交际程度的不同，这两种人以不同的方式调控各自的基因。归纳上述内容可推断，交际程度能调整人的基因组，使它得以良好运作，故本题选B。A项与此意矛盾，可排除。C项在原文中并未提及。D项“个人要找到他们自己的方式来适应环境”不符合Cole博士要表达的意思。