问答题
I was deeply shocked by a Recent survey that suggested 30 per cent of job applicants embellished the truth or lied on a curriculum vitae. Can the figure really be that low? (1).
I had always assumed CVs were filled with evasions, half-truths and downright untruths. But the news that merely 70 per cent of workers are honest has shaken my lack of faith in my fellow humans.
The only consolation is that people often fib in anonymous surveys, just as they do on resumes, which means the real proportion may be higher.
One prediction rang true from the research by the Chartered Institute of Educational Assessors. (2).
It was that the incentive for falsehood is growing, as unemplogment balloons and competition for iobs rises. In coming months recruiters will therefore be bombarded with CVs making extremely misleading claims.
It was the same during the downturn of the early 1990s. Then, one acquaintance obtained a graduate traineeship at a large bank by bumping his third-class degree up to a 2:1. A journalist colleague meanwhile admitted to me that his degree from a top university was entirely fictional. (3).
Another contemporary explained away a gear lost to bone idleness by telling prospective employers that he had been writing a field guide to the wild flowers of the Pyrenees (比利斯山脉).
I might have lied on my own CV, if an east coast Scottish upbringing had not lumbered me with the subliminal conviction that I would burn for eternity in hell if I did.
(4).
A company whose services include background checks on job applicants, sags that
inaccuracies on CVs divide into three main groups. First, there are honest mistakes, typically made when candidates muddle dates.
Second, there is deliberate fibbing about qualifications. Mr Thomas says:"A lie told 20 years ago to get a job can become part of the liar"s reality. So he tells it again when he switches jobs, even though he has become a successful finance director." Third, applicants close up suspicious gaps in their employment history. In one case investigated by Kroll, a candidate turned out to have spent a three-month gap in prison for fraud.
About 65 per cent of businesses take up references for shortlisted job applicants, according to research by the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development. Fewer than half said they found out anything useful. (5).
This is hardly surprising now that the fear of litigation prevents past employers from saying anything more revealing than: "Yes. Derek worked for us. He has a beard and knows a bit about databases."
Less than 40 per cent of businesses bother to check academic and professional qualifications.
【正确答案】
【答案解析】[参考译文]
最近的一份调查让我感到非常震惊,那上面说30%的求职者需要将他们的简历加以润色 或作假。这个数字真有这么低吗?(1)
我一直认为简历史中充斥着借口、半真半假和彻头彻尾 的谎言。但那则只有70%的工人是诚实的新闻让我对自己的想法感到疑惑。
唯一的结论就是, 人们经常在匿名调查中撒一些小谎,就像他们在写简历中所做的那样,因此,我觉得实际数 字可能要高很多。
教育评估员学会所做的此项研究的真正用意是:随着失业和竞争的逐渐加剧,(2)虚假 动机正在逐渐增加。因此,在未来几个月中,招聘人员会见到更多的足以误导其决策的简历。
这与20世纪90年代早期的衰退时期是一样的。当时,我的一个熟人从一个大银行工作 的毕业实习生那里了解到,他将自己的三级荣誉学位提升到了2:1。同时,一个记者同事也 向我承认曾将自己在一所著名大学的学位完全是虚构的。(3)
同时期的另外一个人也曾向雇 主谎称自己曾花一年时间编纂过有关比利牛斯山野花的一本野外工作指南,而其实那东西是
临时抱佛脚的产物。
的我在苏格兰东海岸的成长的经历告诉我,如果在自己的简历中作假,我 将在地狱里永远受煎熬。
(4)
一个对求职者作背景调查的服务公司说,简历的不准确分为三组。第一,诚实 的错误,确实是候选人搞错了日期。
第二,对资质的故意伪造。托马斯先生曾说:“一个讲了 20年的谎话会成为一个事实的一部分。所以即使是一个成功的财务主管,在他换工作的时候 也要再次重复这个谎言。”第三,求职者将自己有问题的区间予以掩盖。克罗尔在调查一宗个 案时,曾发现一个候选人将自己曾在监狱中服刑3个月的经历予以掩盖。
根据人事发展特许协会的研究发现,大约有65%的企业会根据入选求职者的简历来获取参 考信息。不到一半的人说他们找不到任何有用的信息。(5)
对诉讼案的恐惧导致以往的雇主不 敢说除了“是的,德里克曾为我们工作。他留着胡子,对我们的数据有所了解。”以外的话, 这些在当今都不足为奇。
不到40%的企业懒得对候选人的学历及专业资格进行核对。