单选题 .  The extent and limits of ape (猿) intelligence is a hot area in science, but most of the research has focused on cognition. Now a team of scientists has turned the spotlight on emotions, and how well apes can read the human kind as displayed in our facial expressions.
    A paper in the September issue of the journal Developmental Science describes studies from the Wolfgang Kohler Primate Research Center in Leipzig, Germany. In the first test, a researcher sat at a table on one side of a panel while an ape sat on the other side. Two opaque boxes rested on the table. The scientist opened one box  (making sure the ape could not see inside) and smiled with pleasure. He next opened the other and made a disgusted face. The ape was then allowed to reach through one of the holes in the panel and pick one box. Which would he choose?
    In 57 percent of the tests, the ape chose the box that elicited a smile from the scientist rather than an expression of disgust. Good choice. The box that brought the smile contained a grape, and the ape was rewarded for his perspicacity (敏锐) in reading human facial expressions. The other box contained dead insects. The apes' skill at reading an expression of happiness indicates that they can read meaning in the emotional expressions on human faces, suggesting that despite 6 million years of separate evolution apes and humans share a common emotional language.
    In the next experiments, the set-up was the same. An ape saw the scientist hold up a grape and a slice of banana, but his view was then blocked as the scientist put one treat under one cup and the other under the other cup. The ape then watched as the scientist looked under each of the two cups in turn, making an expression of happiness at one and of disgust at the other. The scientist next reached under one cup  (at this point, the ape's view was again blocked, so he could not see which cup the scientist chose) and ate what was inside. His view restored, the ape saw the scientist chewing something with pleasure, and then was allowed to choose a cup for himself.
    This time the apes tended to choose the cup that had triggered the expression of disgust. Counterintuitive (违反常理的)? Not at all. The apes went beyond the far too simple "pick cup that elicited happy face" to make a fairly sophisticated computation. That is, they seemed to reason that the human would eat the food that made him smile, emptying that cup, with the result that only the disgust-inducing cup would still contain a snack.1.  The research on ape emotions is aimed at understanding ______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】 全文首句。
   根据全文首段可以知道,研究猿的智力有两种方法:以前从“认知”入手和现在从“情绪”入手,由此可见,研究猿的情绪也是为了研究它们的智力,因此,本题应选A。
   B和C中的一些用词可分别在对第一个实验和接下来的实验的描述中找到,但它们都不是研究目的,而只是实验过程中表现出来的现象,因此这两个选项均不能选。原文从头到尾都没有说到要对比人和猿,因此D不正确。
[参考译文] 猿的智力大小和范围一直是科学研究中的一个热门领域,但是大多数的研究都集中在猿的认知方面。现在一组科研人员把注意力转向了研究猿的情绪,以及猿对人类的面部表情识别得怎么样。
   《发展科学》杂志9月份刊登的一篇文章介绍了德国莱比锡的沃尔夫冈库勒灵长类动物研究中心的研究。在第一次测试中,研究人员坐在嵌板一侧的桌子旁,而猿则坐在嵌板的另一边。桌上放着两个不透明的盒子。研究人员打开第一个盒子(确保猿看不到盒子的内部),并愉快地笑了。随后,他打开了另一个盒子,做了一个厌恶的表情。然后让猿通过嵌板上的洞选择一个盒子。他会选择哪一个呢?
   在这个测试中,57%的猿会选择让研究人员露出笑脸的盒子,而不去选择让研究人员露出厌恶表情的盒子。不错的选择。让人高兴的盒子里放着葡萄,猿因为敏锐地观察了人类的面部表情而得到了奖赏。另一个盒子放的是一些已经死掉的昆虫。猿读懂人类幸福表情的能力表明,他们可以读懂人类脸上的情绪表情所传达的意义,这说明600万年来,尽管猿和人类分别进化,却有着共同的情感语言。
   在接下来的实验中,位置安排不变。猿看到研究人员拿起了一串葡萄和一根香蕉,但随后猿的视线被遮挡,这时研究人员将葡萄和香蕉分别放在两个杯子底部。接着猿观看研究人员的动作,研究人员依次朝杯子里看,在看第一个杯子时露出幸福的表情,看另一个时则露出厌恶的表情。随后,研究人员把手伸向一个杯子底部(这时候猿的视线再次被挡住,因此它不知道研究人员选择的是哪只杯子),并且把里面的东西拿出来吃掉。猿的视线恢复了,这时它看到研究人员面带幸福地嚼着东西,然后研究人员允许它自己去选择一只杯子。
   这一次,猿趋向于选择那只让人露出厌恶表情的杯子。这有悖常理吗?当然不是。猿并不是简单地“选择引发幸福表情的杯子”,而是进行了一仝相当复杂的让算。那就是他们推断出人类会吃掉让他们高兴的食物,那个杯子已经空了,而只有那个引发厌恶表情的杯子还有点心在里面。