问答题
If you’ve ever been on a jury, you might have noticed that a funny thing happens the minute you get behind closed doors. Everybody starts talking about themselves. They say what they would have done if they had been the plaintiff or the defendant. Being on a jury reminds me why I can’t tolerate talk radio. We Americans seem to have lost the ability to talk about anything but our own experiences. We can’t seem to generalize without stereotyping or to consider evidence that goes against our own experience.
I heard a doctor on a radio show talking about a study that found that exercise reduces the incidence of Alzheimer’s. And caller after caller couldn’t wait to make essentially the opposite point: “Well, my grandmother never exercised and she lived to 95.” We are in an age summed up by the saying: “I experience, therefore I’m right.” Historically, the hallmarks of an uneducated person were the lack of ability to think critically, to use deductive reasoning to distinguish the personal from the universal. Now that seems an apt description of many Americans.
【答案解析】文本节选自2011年7月29日的《基督教科学箴言报》(The Christian Science Monitor),探讨现代人过度依赖个人经验判断、缺乏批判思考的问题。话题相对抽象,难度中上。
作者以担任陪审团的经历引入话题,如果对美国的陪审团制度缺乏了解,也不认识plaintiff和defendant等词汇,则可能在理解上有困难。原文是典型的评论文章,语言介于正式与非正式问题之间,在转换时应注意适当调整句子结构和语序,保证译文通顺易懂。