Directions:
Write an essay of 160-200 words based on the following drawing. In your essay, you should
1) describe the drawing briefly,
2) interpret its intended meaning, and
3) give your comments.
You should write neatly on the ANSWER SHEET.
Write an essay of 160-200 words based on the following drawing. In your essay, you should
1) describe the drawing briefly,
2) interpret its intended meaning, and
3) give your comments.
You should write neatly on the ANSWER SHEET.
【正确答案】
【答案解析】[范文]
As is depicted in the cartoon that according to the New Advertisement Legislation, children under the age of 10 are banned from being advertising endorsers. Some believe that it protects children by providing them favorable conditions free from the allurement of money and fame．However, some others believe that the decision is a restriction on minors' rights and freedom.
I believe that it is not a good idea to ban children under 10 years old from being a spokesman. Firstly, allowing children shooting advertisements does not necessarily lead to the child's and the family's obsession into money and fame. Instead of imposing a ban, the key lies in finding a way to strike a balance and avoid over consume of the talents of the children. Secondly，child spokesmen are more persuasive in advertising products that are designed for children, for example, children's drinks, clothes and toys. It is hard to imagine how many would buy a dress for their 7-year-old daughter just by watching an adult telling you how beautiful it will look like.
In conclusion, I believe children spokesmen have their advantages in promoting certain products and they should not be banned from shooting advertisement under proper guidance.
Children speak louder than adults sometimes
As is depicted in the cartoon that according to the New Advertisement Legislation, children under the age of 10 are banned from being advertising endorsers. Some believe that it protects children by providing them favorable conditions free from the allurement of money and fame．However, some others believe that the decision is a restriction on minors' rights and freedom.
I believe that it is not a good idea to ban children under 10 years old from being a spokesman. Firstly, allowing children shooting advertisements does not necessarily lead to the child's and the family's obsession into money and fame. Instead of imposing a ban, the key lies in finding a way to strike a balance and avoid over consume of the talents of the children. Secondly，child spokesmen are more persuasive in advertising products that are designed for children, for example, children's drinks, clothes and toys. It is hard to imagine how many would buy a dress for their 7-year-old daughter just by watching an adult telling you how beautiful it will look like.
In conclusion, I believe children spokesmen have their advantages in promoting certain products and they should not be banned from shooting advertisement under proper guidance.