Teachers are heroes, not villains, and it"s time to stop demonizing them. It has become fashionable to blame all of society"s manifold sins and wickedness on "teachers unions," as if it were possible to separate these supposedly evil organizations from the dedicated public servants who belong to them. Collective bargaining is not the problem, and taking that right away from teachers will not fix the schools. The fact is that teachers are being saddled with absurdly high expectations. Some studies have shown a correlation between student performance and teacher "effectiveness," depending how this elusive quality is measured, but there is a whole body of academic literature proving the stronger correlation between student performance and a much more important variable: family income. Yes, I"m talking about poverty. Sorry to be so gauche , but when teachers point out the relationship between income and achievement, they"re not shirking responsibility. They"re just stating an inconvenient truth. According to figures compiled by the College Board, students from families making more than $200,000 score more than 300 points higher on the SAT, on average, than students from families making less than $20,000 a year. There is, in fact, a clear relationship all the way along the scale; Each increment in higher family income translates into points on the test. Sean Rcardon of Stanford University"s Center for Education Policy Analysis concluded in a recent study that the achievement gap between high-income and low-income students is actually widening. It is unclear why this might be happening; maybe it is due to increased income inequality, maybe the relationship between income and achievement has somehow become stronger, maybe there is some other reason. Whatever the cause, our society"s answer seems to be: Beat up the teachers. We tend to believe that most of the teachers in low-income, low-performing schools are incompetent—and, by extension, that most of the teachers in upper-crust schools, where students perform well, are paragons of pedagogical virtue. But some of the most dedicated and talented teachers I"ve ever met were working in "failing" inner-city schools. And yes, in award-winning schools where "all the children are above average", I"ve met some unimaginative hacks who should never be allowed near a classroom. It is reasonable to hold teachers accountable for their performance, but it is not reasonable—or, in the end, productive" to hold them accountable for factors that lie far beyond their control. It is fair to insist that teachers approach their jobs with the assumption that every single child, rich or poor, can succeed. It is not fair to expect teachers to correct all the imbalances and remedy all the pathologies that result from growing inequality in our society. Portraying teachers as villains doesn"t help a single child. Ignoring the reasons for the education gap in this country is no way to close it. And there"s a better way to learn about the crisis than going to the movies. Visit a school instead.
单选题 The text is primarily concerned with______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:本题考查考生对文章主旨和写作目的的理解。考生若能在规定时间内阅读全文,本题应该不难做出正确选择。A选项可以直接排除,全文没有任何一个地方展开讨论教师工会的问题,文章在第二段就把教师工会和教师分开,支持教师而非教师工会。文章从一个角度为教师开脱,但是并没有解释为什么教师是英雄,因此B项错误。本文确实讨论了造成教育差距的一个重要原因,但是并没有列举其他原因,因此D错误。C项是对文章主旨的较好概括。
单选题 The underlined word "gauche"(Line 4, Paragraph 3)is closest in meaning to______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:本题考查考生对生词意思的理解。“gauche”一词出现在文中第三段第八行。本段一开始作者就指出教师们正承担着本不应该承担的责任和过高的期望,紧接着作者引入了学生学术表现上的差距这一问题,指出造成这一差距的原因不在于老师,而在于家庭收入。在西方社会,不论是正式文章,还是日常闲谈,关于钱的话题总是敏感的,尤其在本文,这里赤裸裸的指出钱是造成教育差距的原因,并且更进一步的用“poverty”(贫穷)一词直抒胸臆,可谓直截了当,气氛有点难堪。B是正确选项。A、B、D均是命题人故意设置的干扰选项。用来迷惑考生,均不正确。
单选题 According to the text, which one of the following is strongly related with student performance?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:本题考查考生对文章主要论据的理解。这篇文章为教师辩护的一个主要论据就是造成学生学术表现差距的原因在于家庭收入,理解了这一点,就不难选出D是正确答案。ABC均是很具有迷惑性的选项,因为这三个都是通常意义上人们理解的对学生成绩会有重要影响的因素,并且A和C在文中都有提到。A出现在第三段第三行,“effectiveness”是“有效性”的意思,指的是教师教育的成效,即教师是否“给力”。B文中并无提及。C项是对第五段所述内容的一个引申,第五段指出了好学校和差学校在师资力量以及学生表现上的差距,可引申为学校排名对学生表现的影响。文章在第五段指出学校有差异,但是学校里老师的好坏却未必跟学校好坏有关,并且学校或者老师的好坏都不是学生成绩差距的主要原因。因此C也错误。
单选题 It can be inferred from the text that a student is more likely to get higher points in SAT if he/ she______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】解析:本题考查考生对第四段和第五段具体论述的理解。SAT考试(Scholastic Assessment Test)是由美国ETS(Educational Testing Service)组织的“学术水平测验考试”,是美国高中生进入美国大学的标准入学考试,可称为美国的高考。第四段一开始就举例,那些家庭年收入超过20万的学生的sAT成绩比那些年收入不到2万的家庭里的学生平均高出300分,进而指出家庭收入和学生高考成绩之间呈正比例。由此可知A是正确答案。B选项文章并无提及。C选项说法错误,家庭收入并不是指学生自己劳动所得.并且恰恰相反,文中指出家庭年收入高于20万的学生相比而言更易取得高分。D项在第五段有提及,但是恰恰是为了说明老师自身素质与学生表现之间没有强烈联系,因此D项错误。
单选题 With which of the following statements regarding education would the author most likely agree?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:本题考查考生对第五和第六两段内容的理解。作者在第五段驳斥了两种关于学校和老师跟学生成绩之间关系的普遍看法,AB选项即这两种看法,作者用自己的亲身经历指出这两种看法是不正确,并且有可能是恰恰相反的。因此AB选项错误。作者在第五段指出,公认的坏学校里也有很优秀的老师.而公认的好学校里也有非常差劲的老师,总结起来就是:是否一所学校里所有的老师都是能干的跟这所学校学生的整体表现没有关系,因此C项正确。作者在第六段一开始就指出,教师们不应该为那些自己不能掌控的因素负责,具体到本文的论点,也就是说教师不应该为学生学术表现的差距负责,这是他们掌控之外的因素,D项观点刚好跟作者观点背道而驰。