When George Osborne, Chancellor of the Exchequer, is spotted outside Westminster, he is very often making an appearance on a building site, wearing a fluorescent safety jacket. It was no surprise to hear him claim once again, in his budget speech on March 19th, that "We're getting Britain building". Sadly, given the huge extent of Britain's housing shortage, the chancellor's proposed interventions do not add up to much. The biggest announcement was that the government will extend Help to Buy, a scheme that guarantees mortgages for people purchasing newly built homes. Mr Osborne also hopes to build a new town at Ebbsfleet, a patch of post-industrial land in the Thames estuary, and promises to speed up the redevelopment of several rotting 1960s and 1970s social housing estates in London. By making it easier for house builders to shift their stock, Help to Buy has probably helped boost building slightly, especially in northern cities where construction had all but ceased. Extending the programme will boost Britain's housing stock by 120,000 by 2020, the Treasury claims, though it will also expose taxpayers to any future house-price crash. Mr Osborne also announced a new fund to support lending to small house builders—who have struggled to get financing in recent years— which ought to have a similar effect. The new town is more adventurous. Ebbsfleet, where a high-speed rail link to London opened in 2007, has had plans for new homes for almost 20 years. Few have been built, mostly because the site is a partially flooded quarry with little in the way of shops, public transport or infrastructure. The government's new idea is to create a development corporation with control over planning and the ability to borrow to clean up and prepare the site. That was how post-war new towns such as Milton Keynes and Stevenage were built. A similar interventionism is visible in the plan to rebuild 1960s estates. Many of these, such as the Aylesbury Estate in Southwark and Robin Hood Gardens in Tower Hamlets, are crumbling. By increasing the density on the sites, and using the proceeds of selling the extra houses built, it ought to be possible to cover the cost of reconstruction. But councils have been short of money to do much themselves, and private developers extract high returns in exchange for putting up capital. With central-government money, those projects ought to move quicker and councils ought to get more for their land.
单选题
George Osborne's housing proposal seems to be ineffective because of______.
【正确答案】
B
【答案解析】解析:细节题。根据George Osborne和housing proposals定位到第一段最后一句,其中George Osborne=chancellor;housing proposals=proposed interventions;ineffective“无效的”=do not add up to much“加起来没有多少,收效甚微”;because of=given“考虑到,由于”。故答案来自上半句:given the huge extent of Britain’s housing shortage“由于英国巨大的楼市缺口”。与该句同义替换的选项为[B]enormous gap of the real estate market。其中,enormous“巨大的”=huge“巨大的”;gap“缺口”=shortage“缺乏”;real estate market“房地产市场,楼市”=housing“住房”。故[B]为正确答案。选项[A]the lack of support from local government“缺乏地方政府的支持”;[C]the financial difficulties of the government“政府财务困难”;[D]the huge expansion of housing construction“住房建设的过度扩张”;这三项均无法与答案句同义替换,故都非正确答案。
单选题
According to Paragraph 2, Help to Buy is a project designed to______.
【正确答案】
C
【答案解析】解析:细节题。根据关键词Help to Buy定位到第二段首句:...Help to Buy,a scheme that guarantees mortgages for people purchasing newly built homes.题于project“项目”=scheme“计划”;故that之后的句子为答案句。[A]help people to build new hornes“帮助人们建造新家”;原文说的是guarantees mortgages for people purchasing newly built homes“为新房购买者提供抵押担保”,可见二者并不相同,故[A]可以排除。[B]guarantee mortgage for everyone“保障所有人的抵押贷款”;文章说的是people purchasing newly built homes“新房购买者”,而非everyone“所有人”,该项属于偷换概念,也属于过分夸大,且everyone一词本身太过绝对,该项错误。[C]ensure easy loan for home buyers“确保购房者能够轻松贷款”;该项ensure=guarantee;loan=mortgage;home buyers=people purchasing newly built homes;该项与答案句同义替换。[D]speed up social housing construction“加速社会住房建设”;该项与答案句毫无关系,故排除。综上,本题答案为[C]。
单选题
We can learn from Paragraph 3 that extending Help to Buy______.
【正确答案】
D
【答案解析】解析:推理题。根据extending Help to Buy定位到第三段第二、三行Extending the programme,其中the programme指代Help to Buy。故答案句为:Extending the programme will boost Britain’s housing stock by 120,000 by 2020,the Treasury claims,though it will also expose taxpayers to any future house-price crash.该句大意为“财政部表示,到2020年,延长购房支持计划预计能为英国新增12万套新房供给,虽然纳税人会有承担未来房价崩盘的风险。”通过这句话得出结论:延长购房支持计划有利有弊。(最好加上一句具体的解释:提供新房供给是“利”,房价崩盘的风险是“弊”)其中,boost为正面词汇,crash为负面词汇。[A]will bring numerous benefits“将会带来许多好处”;原文说的是有利有弊,该项表述过于片面,故排除。[B]may greatly boost the stock market“可能大大推动股市”;原文说的是boost housing stock“提高住房存量”而非boost stock market“推动股市”,该项属于偷换概念。[C]will do more harm than good“将弊大于利”;原文提到有利有弊,但是没有说哪方面更严重,故该项也非答案。[D]may be both constructive and risky“可能既具有建设性,又具有风险性”;该项即原文提到的“有利有弊”,故[D]为正确答案。
单选题
Ebbsfleet is mentioned in the text to show______.
【正确答案】
B
【答案解析】解析:例证题。根据Ebbsfleet定位到第四段第一行。该段几乎整段都在讲Ebbsfleet的例子,而文章举例一般是为了论证某个观点,整段具有观点性且具有总结性的句子只有首句:The new town is more adventurous.该句即本题答案句。与该句替换的选项为[B]the boldness of building new towns“建设新城镇的胆量”;其中,boldness“胆量”=adventurous“冒险的,大胆创新的”;new towns则是原词复现。[A]the necessary part of urbanization“城市化的必要部分”;[C]the urgency of housing construction“住房建设迫在眉睫”;[D]the importance of building infrastructure“建设基础设施的重要性”:这三项均无法与“The new town is more adventurous”一句替换,故本题答案为[B]。
单选题
In return for investing in estate reconstruction, private developers need______.
【正确答案】
A
【答案解析】解析:细节题。根据题干关键词private developers定位到最后一段倒数第二行:private developers extract high returns in exchange for putting up capital.其中题干in return for“作为回报”=in exchange for“作为回报/交换”;investing“投资”=putting up capital“提供资金,投资”:private developers need“私营开发商需要”=private developers extract“私营开发商抽取”;故答案为extract之后的high return“高额回报”。[A]ample reward“丰厚回报”;该项等同于“高额回报”,故为答案。[B]new projects“新项目”;该项与答案毫无关系。[C]quick return“快速回报”;该项属于偷换概念。[D]more power“更多权力”;该项属于无中生有。综上,本题答案为[A]。