Music is a mystery. It is unique to the human race: no other species produces elaborate sound for no particular reason. It has been, and remains, part of every known civilization on Earth. Lengths of bone fashioned into flutes were in use 40,000 years ago. And it engages people"s attention more comprehensively than almost anything else: scans show that when people listen to music, virtuallyevery area of their brain becomes more active. Yet it serves no obvious adaptive purpose. Charles Darwin, in The Descent of Man, noted that "neither the enjoyment nor the capacity of producing musical notes are faculties of the least direct use to man in reference to his ordinary habits of life." Then, what is the point of music. Steven Pinker, a cognitive psychologist, has called music "auditory cheesecake, an exquisite confection crafted to tickle the sensitive spots of at least six of our mental faculties." If it vanished from our species, he said, "the rest of our lifestyle would be virtually unchanged." Others have argued that, on the contrary, music, along with art and literature, is part of what makes people human; its absence would have a brutalizing effect. Philip Ball, a British science writer and an avid music enthusiast, comes down somewhere in the middle. He says that music is ingrained in our auditory, cognitive and motor functions. We have a music instinct as much as a language instinct, and could not rid ourselves of it. He goes through each component of music to explain how and why it works, using plentiful examples drawn from a refreshingly wide range of different kinds of music, from Bach to the Beatles, and from nursery rhymes to jazz. His basic message is encouraging and uplifting: people know much more about music than they think. They start picking up the rules from the day they are born, perhaps even before, by hearing it all around them. Very young children can tell if a tune or harmony is not quite right and most adults can differentiate between kinds of music even if they have had no training. Music is completely sui generis. It should not tell a non-musical story; the listener will decode it for himself. Many, perhaps most, people have experienced a sudden rush of emotion on hearing a particular piece of music; a thrill or chill, a sense of excitement or exhilaration, a feeling of being swept away by it. They may even be moved to tears, without being able to tell why. Musical analysts have tried hard to find out how this happens, but with little success. Perhaps some mysteries are best preserved.
单选题 It can be inferred from the first paragraph that_____.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:判断推理题。第一段第五句的engages people’s attention more…than表明:音乐比其他事物更能让人全神贯注于其中,故而选C项。
单选题 To which of the following statements would Steven Pinker most probably agree?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:观点态度题。根据Steven Pinker定位至第二段第四、五句,答题重点在于理解第五句引号内的内容。此处引用了Steven Pinker的话,他认为假使人类突然失去音乐,我们的生活方式几乎一成不变,由此判断C项为答案。
单选题 According to Philip Ball"s research, which of the following is true?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:细节理解题。根据人名Philip Ball定位到第三段。其中第三句表明,人类的音乐本能就好比语言天赋,不可能被去除,D项与原文符合。
单选题 The saying "sui generis" (Para. 5) is closest in meaning to _____.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】解析:词语理解题。文章末段讲人们可以自我理解音乐中的内涵,音乐能够引发人们强烈的情感反应以及至今仍有奥秘等待解答。这些都说明了音乐的独特性,因而选A项。
单选题 Which of the following would be the best title of the text?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】解析:主旨大意题。全文探讨了音乐的各种特性和功能,以及人们对音乐的各种看法,可谓是一篇研究音乐奥秘的佳文。A项既反应了文章内容,又非常应景生动,为正确选项。