阅读理解 How's this for a coincidence? Charles Darwin and Abraham Lincoln were born in the same year, on the same day: Feb. 12, 1809. Although people hardly think of them in tandem, yet instinctively, we want to say that they belong together. It's not just because they were both great men, and not because they happen to be exact contemporaries. Rather, it's because the scientist and the politician each touched off a revolution that changed the world.
They were both revolutionaries in the sense that both men upended realities that prevailed when they were born. They seem—and sound—modern to us, because the world they left behind them is more or less the one we still live in. So, considering the joint greatness of their contributions—and the coincidence of their conjoined birthdays—it is hard not to wonder: who was the greater man? It's an apples-and-oranges—or Superman-vs.-Santa—comparison. But if you limit the question to influence, very quickly the balance tips in Lincoln's favor.
As great as his book on evolution is, it does no harm to remember that Darwin hurried to publish The Origin of Species because he thought he was about to be scooped by his fellow naturalist Alfred Russel Wallace. In other words, there was a certain inevitability to Darwin's theory. Ideas about evolution surfaced throughout the first part of the 19th century, and while none of them was as convincing as Darwin's—until Wallace came along—it was not as though he was the only man who had the idea.
Lincoln, in contrast, is unique. Take him out of the picture, and there is no telling what might have happened to the country. True, his election to the presidency did provoke secession and, in turn, the war itself, but that war seems inevitable—not a question of if but when. Once in office, he becomes the indispensable man. Certainly we know what happened once he was assassinated: Reconstruction was ad-ministered punitively and then abandoned, leaving the issue of racial equality to dangle for another century.
If Darwin were not so irreplaceable as Lincoln, that should not negate his accomplishment. No one could have formulated his theory any more elegantly. Their identical birthdays afford us a superb opportunity to observe these men in the shared context of their time—how each was shaped by his circumstances, how each reacted to the beliefs that steered the world into which he was bom and ultimately how each reshaped his corner of that world and left it irrevocably changed.
单选题 1.Charles Darwin and Abraham Lincoln belong together in that
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】事实细节题,考查因果细节。根据人名可定位到第一段。题干中的信号词in that表明这是因果关系考点,应在原文中留意相应的词出现的语句。原文提到他们两位都引发了改变世界的革命,故选C项。
单选题 2.What does the author mean by "an apples-and-oranges—or Superman-vs.-Santa—comparison"(Lines 4-5, Paragraph 2)?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】推理判断题。根据题干要求定位在第二段。对句意的理解要结合具体语境。该段最后一句句首的But作为转折信号词往往提示重点信息的出现,此处讲的是:如果从影响力角度看则林肯占优势,故推断若不提出这种假设,则两者不分伯仲,选A项。
单选题 3.Alfred Russel Wallace is mentioned in order to show
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】事实细节题,考查例证细节。根据人名Alfred Russel Wallace定位到第三段。本题考查举这一例子是为了说明什么,这类题的答案一般出现在例子前后。此处作者举Wallace的例子是为了强调达尔文不是唯一一个提出进化理论的人.故选C项。
单选题 4.Lincoln's contribution to the world can be best described as
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】推理判断题。第四段主要论述了林肯的独一无二和必不可少,强调了如果没有他的存在,美国不知道会是什么样子。ground-breaking“具有开拓意义的”与原文传递的意思一致,故选B项。
单选题 5.Which of the following is true of the text?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】事实细节题。文中提到林肯执政时是不可或缺的人物,他遇刺身亡后种族平等问题又拖延了一个世纪才得以解决,从而可以合理推断林肯在世时曾致力于解决种族问题,故选B项。