单选题
Until recently, the University of Kent prided itself on its friendly image. Not any more. Over the past few months it has been working hard, with the help of media consultants, to downplay its cosy reputation in favour of something more academic and serious. Kent is not alone in considering an image revamp (翻新). Changes to next year's funding regime are forcing universities to justify charging students up to £ 9,000 in fees. Nowadays universities are putting much more of a focus on their brands and what their value propositions are. While in the past universities have often focused on student social life and attractions of the university town in recruitment campaigns, they are now concentrating on more tangible (实在的) attractions, such as employment prospects, engagement with industry, and lecturer contact hours, making clear exactly what students are going to get for their money. The problem for universities is that if those benefits fail to materialise, students notice. That worries Rob Behrens, who deals with student complaints. 'Universities need to be extremely careful in describing what's going to happen to students,' he says. 'As competition is going to get greater for attracting gifted students, there is a danger that universities will go the extra mile.' One university told prospective engineering students they would be able to design a car and race it at Brands Hatch, which never happened, he says. Others have promised use of sophisticated equipment that turned out to be broken or unavailable. 'If universities spent as much money on handling complaints and appeals appropriately as they spend on marketing, they would do better at keeping students, and in the National Student Survey returns,' he says. Ongoing research tracking prospective 2012 students suggests that they are not only becoming more sophisticated in thinking about what they want from a university, but are also spending more time researching evidence to back up institutional claims. Hence the growing importance of the student survey. From next September, all institutions will also be expected to publish on their websites key information sets, allowing easier comparison between institutions, between promises and reality, and the types of jobs and salaries graduates go on to. As a result, it is hardly surprising that universities are beginning to change the way they market themselves. While the best form of marketing for institutions is to be good at what they do, they also need to be clear about how they are different from others. And it is vital that once an institution claims to be particularly good at something, it must live up to it. The moment you position yourself, you become exposed, and if you fail in that you are in trouble.
单选题
What was the University of Kent famous for?
【正确答案】
A
【答案解析】本题询问过去肯特大学因何闻名。第1段第1句指出肯特大学不久前还为自己的亲民形象(friendly image)自豪,之后话锋一转,指出它正在采取策略以淡化安逸的名声(downplay its cosy reputation)。由此可见,肯特大学以前是因为这两个特点而出名,A项“其舒适的校园生活”与此吻合,comfortable与cosy为同义词,故为答案。
单选题
What are universities trying to do to attract students?
【正确答案】
D
【答案解析】本题询问现在各所大学如何努力来吸引学生。第3段第1句指出,如今大学更注重品牌以及价值主张;第2句进一步指出,大学现在更注重实实在在的吸引力。答案应能概括这两句所表达的内容。D项“呈现更好的学校形象”能全面涵盖本段所提及的brands, value propositions及tangible attractions,同时与第2段第1句谈及的大学想要重塑形象呼应。注意选项中的academic应理解为“学校的,学院的”,而非“学术性的”。
单选题
What does Rob Behrens suggest universities do in marketing themselves?
【正确答案】
C
【答案解析】本题询问罗布·贝伦斯对大学营销有何建议。第4段第3句中的need to be...可表示建议,因此要重点理解引号中的话语。他指出大学在招生时描述前景要谨慎,因为很多大学会为了吸引学生而夸大其词。因此C项“不要做出他们不能兑现的承诺”为答案。
单选题
What is students' chief consideration in choosing a university?
单选题
What must universities show to win recruitment campaigns?
【正确答案】
D
【答案解析】本题询问大学在招生竞争中胜出必须体现何种特质。文章第1—7段分析了大学营销策略的改变及学生择校时更注重大学能否兑现承诺。第8段引出结论,说明在此背景下,大学改变营销方式不足为奇。该段第2句进一步指出最好的营销手段是扬己所长,句中also一词暗示与此同样重要的是how they are different from others,因此D“他们无论如何都得与众不同”为答案,unique与different from others同义。