单选题 Pressure is mounting on Ahold"s embattled supervisory board following the Dutch grocery group"s decision to pay its new chief executive more than C= 10m to lead its recovery from a ruining accounting scandal.
Anders Moberg"s pay package—and the timing of its disclosure at a shareholder meeting last week—has confronted Ahold with a new credibility crisis as it struggles to restore confidence after the C=970m ( MYM1 bn) scandal.
The dispute—evident in a sea of critical media comment in the Netherlands at the weekend threatens to divert management from its recovery strategy, built on significant divestments and a likely rights issue to reduce C=11bn in net debt. Units deemed unable to attain first or second position in food retail within three to five years will immediately be put up for sale.
The board"s position appears all the more delicate following comments made by Mr. Moberg to the Financial Times, in which he criticized non—executive directors for ignoring his advice to disclose his salary in May, when he agreed his contract.
Instead Ahold waited more than four months to make the announcement, on the day share—holders were asked to approve Mr. Moberg"s appointment.
"I was the one who said I liked transparency, and I had hoped [the supervisory board] had shown [the salary package] in May to avoid a situation like this," Mr. Moberg told the FT.
As the row prompted the left—leaning Dutch Daily to call for a boycott of Ahold"s Dutch Albert Heijn supermarket chain where only last week Ahold announced 440 redundancies-it was clear the supervisory board had badly misjudged the reaction.
While Henny de Ruiter, supervisory board chairman, said the salary was a fair reflection of what a company in Ahold"s unfavorable circumstances had to pay to attract a top manager, furious investors accused it of pushing through the package regardless of investor opinion.
Furthermore, Dutch media commentators noted that the scandal at Ahold had been the trigger for the Dutch government to appoint a commission to strengthen corporate governance.
That commission has recommended a limit on executive bonuses, far below the potential two—and—a—half times annual salary that Mr. Moberg could earn.
Meanwhile, Mr. Moberg is trying to distance himself from the row and focus on strategy. He told the FT that measures had already been taken to raise its stake in the ICAA hold joint venture in Scandinavia.
Ahold had included in its forecasts an amount necessary to buy the shares of either of its joint venture partners, who should exercise a "put option" and sell their stake from April 2004.
单选题 The decision on Anders Moberg"s pay package has ______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 本题考查事实细节。第一段提到,在荷兰食品集团决定通过付给新任命的首席执行官高额薪水来引导集团从会计丑闻中恢复之后,阿霍德公司四面楚歌的监事会面临的压力日趋上升。第二段进一步说明,首席执行官安德斯·莫博格的薪酬使阿霍德公司面临一场新的信用危机。第八段提到,虽然监事会主席认为这样一个薪酬公平地反映了像阿霍德这样一个处于不利条件的公司需用多少薪酬才能吸引高层管理人员,但是愤怒的投资者仍然谴责监事会不顾他们的意见强行这样做。至此可以推出,薪酬的决定受到他们的批评,A项正确。B项和C项是高薪聘用的意图,A项才是结果。第四段提到,首席执行官批评非执行董事没有接受他公布薪酬的建议。第六段又引用他的话指出,如果一开始将薪酬透明化,就可以避免现在的不利形势。因此,首席执行官感到的不是压力,而是对薪酬不能公布于众的做法不满。
单选题 The recovery strategy by Ahold"s management includes ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 本题考查事实细节。第三段提到,关于薪酬问题的争议威胁迫使管理层的注意力将从复兴策略上转移。该策略通过企业出售(divestments)和可能的授权来减少债务。那些被认为不能在三至五年内获得食品零售第一、二位的零售企业(units)将立即被拍卖。因此,D项正确。A项和B项文中未提,C项虽然出现了原词issue rights,但出现了没有的信息more retailers,也应排除。
单选题 Anders Moberg thought that if his salary had been announced earlier, ______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 本题考查推理引申。注意题干中if条件句中用的是虚拟语气,因此正确选项应是一种未能实现的结果。第四段提到安德斯·莫博格批评公司非执行董事没有接受他在5月份公布薪酬的建议。第六段引用他的话中又提到,“我真希望监事会5月份已经公布这个薪酬来避免这样的情形(监事会处境困难)出现”。因此A项正确。第四段末句中when引导的时间状语从句说明5月份的时候他已同意签订合同。因此B项不是虚拟结果。文中未把“薪酬”与“复兴计划”联系起来说明两者的相互影响,因此C项无从得知。第八段提到股东反对给莫博格薪酬,但没有说明是因为公布时间造成的,因此我们无法得出公布早一些,股东就不会反对的结论。D项无从推出。
单选题 Before the scandal at Ahold, the executive bonuses in Dutch companies ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 本题考查推理引申。第九段提到,荷兰媒体评论员指出,阿霍德公司的丑闻引起荷兰政府任命一个委员会来加强对公司的管理。这个委员会对管理人员的红利提出了一个限度,这个限度远远低于莫博格可能挣到的2.5倍年薪。可见,丑闻前后的变化在于政府开始关注并监控管理人员的红利。因此C项正确。其他项都不能从文中推出。
单选题 According to Moberg"s recovery strategy, Ahold will ______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 本题考查事实细节。倒数第二段提到,莫博格努力让自己远离争吵,将注意力集中在复兴计划上。他告诉《金融时报》(FT)说,他已经采取措施增加在斯堪的纳维亚与ICA公司合资的股份。因此B项正确。最后一段提到,阿霍德在它的预测中已经包括了足够多的资金来购买任何一家合资伙伴的股份。合资伙伴都应该运用卖出选择权(put option),从2004年4月开始出售他们的股份。A项显然不对,它把“买”变成了“卖”。C项文中未提。D项描述不确切,“购买股份”并不是“施加潜在的影响”。