Technology is supposed to make our lives easier, allowing us to do things more quickly and efficiently. But too often it seems to make things harder. This spiral of complexity, often called "feature creep," costs consumers time, but it also costs businesses money. Product returns in the U.S. cost a hundred billion dollars a year, and a recent study by Elke den Ouden, of Philips Electronics,found that at least half of returned products have nothing wrong with them. Consumers just couldn"t figure out how to use them. Companies now know a great deal about problems of usability and consumer behavior, so why is it that feature creep proves unstoppable? In part, feature creep is the product of the so-called internal-audience problem: the people who design and sell products are not the ones who buy and use them, and what engineers and marketers think is important is not necessarily what"s best for consumers. The engineers tend not to notice when more options make a product less usable. And marketing and sales departments see each additional feature as a new selling point, and a new way to lure customers. You might think, then, that companies could avoid feature creep by just paying attention to what customers really want But that"s where the trouble begins, because although consumers find overloaded gadgets unmanageable, they also find them attractive. It turns out that when we look at a new product in a store we tend to think that the more features there are, the better. It"s only once we get the product home and try to use it that we realize the virtues of simplicity. It seems odd that we don"t anticipate feature fatigue and thus avoid it But, as numerous studies have shown, people are not, in general, good at predicting what will make them happy in the future. As a result, we will pay more for more features because we systematically overestimate how often we"ll use them. We also overestimate our ability to figure out how a complicated product works. The fact that buyers want bells and whistles but users want something clear and simple creates a peculiar problem for companies. A product that doesn"t have enough features may fail to catch our eye in the store. But a product with too many features is likely to annoy consumers and generate bad word of mouth, as BMWs original iDrive system did.
单选题
In the first paragraph, the author mainly discusses
【正确答案】
C
【答案解析】解析:主旨大意题,考查段落大意。根据题干定位到第一段。其中讲到随着科技的进步,产品的功能蔓延导致许多问题,故C项与之相符。A项benefits与文意相悖;B项the recent study仅为一个例证,并非本段讨论的主要问题;D项many problems of usability仅在本段提及并未展开。
单选题
Which of the following is true according to the second paragraph?
【正确答案】
C
【答案解析】解析:推理判断题。根据题干定位在第二段。本段末明确提出市场营销部门还把这些附加功能视为新的卖点用以吸引客户,故C项正确。A项the audience problem是对原文internal-audience的曲解:B项is not good是对原文not necessarily what"s best for的曲解;D项quality未提及。
单选题
Companies find it difficult to avoid feature creep because consumers
单选题
It is stated in Paragraph 4 that the buyers generally
【正确答案】
A
【答案解析】解析:推理判断题。根据题干定位到第四段。本段最后一句明确说明我们过高估计了自己使用这类功能复杂的产品的能力,故A项与之相符。B项deeply convinced"深信”以及all过于绝对化:C项be fed up with“已经厌烦”未提及;D项are quite clear about"已经很清楚”与文意“人们都不太擅长预测将来什么会令他们快乐”相悖。
单选题
By saying "buyers want bells and whistles" (Line 1, Paragraph 5), the author means that they want to buy
【正确答案】
D
【答案解析】解析:语义理解题。根据题干定位到第五段。此类题需从上下文进行推断。but提示了前后文的转折关系,后文表明使用者希望产品简单易操作,因此推断前文意思应为购买者则喜欢花哨复杂的产品,因此才会产生apeculiar problem,故D项与之相符。A项loud noises是对bells and whistles的曲解;B项张冠李戴;C项“拥有很多功能却又不会让消费者感到心烦的产品”并未提及。