单选题 .  Several years ago I was teaching a course on the philosophical assumptions and cultural impact of massive multi-user online games at Williams College. The students in the course were very intelligent and obviously interested in the topic.
    But as the semester progressed, I began to detect a problem with the class. The students were working hard and performing well but there was no energy in our discussions and no passion in the students. They were hesitant to express their ideas and often seemed to be going through the motions. I tried to encourage them to be more venturesome with tactics I had used successfully in the past but nothing worked.
    One day I asked them what was or, perhaps better, was not going on. Why were they so cautious and where was their enthusiasm for learning? They seemed relieved to talk about it and their response surprised me. Since pre-kindergarten, they explained, they had been programmed to perform well so they could get to the next level. They had been taught the downside of risk and encouraged to play it safe. What mattered most was getting into a good elementary school, middle school and high school so that they would finally be admitted to a top college.  Having succeeded beyond their parents' wildest expectations, they did not know why they were in college and had no idea what to do after graduation.
    In today's market-driven economy we constantly hear that choice is the highest good and that competition fuels innovation. But this is not always true. Choice provokes anxiety and competition can quell (压制) the imagination and discourage the spirit of experimentation that is necessary for creativity. In a world obsessed with ratings, well-meaning parents all too often train their children to jump through the hoops they think will lead to success.
    This was a bad bet—the course many young people were forced to take has not paid off. The lucrative jobs they expected as a reward for years of hard work have vanished and show little sign of returning in the near future. The difficult truth is that their education has not prepared them for the world they face.
    Though many young people have become disillusioned with Wall Street and all it represents and would like to pursue alternative careers, they have neither the educational nor financial resources to do so. The situation is critical—colleges and universities must be reformed in ways that allow students to develop the knowledge and skills they need for creative and productive fives. And parents must give their children the freedom to explore possibilities they never could have imagined.1.  By saying that students "seemed to be going through the motions", the author most probably means that the students were ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】 第2段第3句。
   从第2段第2句提到的no energy,no passion等词可看出,学生上课没有激情。由此推测,seemed to be going through the motions应该也是说学生上课不主动,缺乏热情等特点,符合这种推断的是D。
   第2段最后一句提到作者需要“鼓励”学生,这就意味着A“足够有激情”、B“足够冒险”错误;第1段说学生很聪明,可排除C。
[参考译文] 几年前,我在威廉姆斯学院教授一门有关哲学假定和多人在线网络游戏所造成的文化影响的课程。参加课程的学生都很聪明,而且他们对这个课题也明显很感兴趣。
   但是随着学期的深入,我开始发觉班上有一个问题。学生都很认真努力,表现也不错,但是课堂讨论的时候却总是没有活力,学生也缺乏激情。他们在表达自己观点的时候常常像挤牙膏一样,犹豫不决。我尝试过很多之前用过且奏效的方法以鼓励他们大胆一些,但情况依然丝毫不见好转。
   有一天我终于开口问他们到底怎么回事,到底有什么不对劲,为什么这么小心翼翼?学习激情都到哪里去了?他们似乎放下了担子并吐露了心声,而他们的回答却令我感到吃惊。他们解释道,从托儿所起,他们就被设定了模式,知道要好好表现才能更进一步。他们被灌输了一种观念:要将风险降到最低,谨慎行事。对他们来说最重要的事情就是进一所好的小学、好的初中、好的高中,最终争取进入顶尖大学深造。在满足了家长最大的期望之后,他们竟然不知道他们为什么来上大学,也完全不知道毕业后要做仕么。
   在今天以市场为导向的经济体系中,我们常常听到,有选择是最好的,有竞争才会推动创新。但这句话并不总是正确的。选择让人感觉焦虑,而竞争会抑制想象力,甚至阻碍创新所必需的实验精神。在一个喜好排名的世界里,善意的家长常常把自己的孩子带到大人们认为会通向成功的道路上。
   这是一个失败的赌注——许多年轻人被迫走上的这条路并没有通向成功。他们原本希望多年的辛勤苦读会换来回报丰厚的工作,可惜这种理想中的工作已经消失了,也没有迹象显示在不远的未来会再出现。残酷的现实是:他们接受的教育并没有使他们准备好面对眼前的世界。
   虽然很多年轻人对于华尔街的一切已经醒悟过来,打算从事别的职业,他们却既没有教育资本也没有经济资本。现在的形势已经十万火急,大学院校必须进行改革,要允许学生学习并发展创新和生产所需要的知识和技能。而家长必须给孩子们自由,让他们探索父母也许无法想象的可能性。