单选题 .  Women make up only 14 percent of full professors in U.S. economics departments. In stark contrast to other social sciences where women typically receive over 60 percent of doctoral degrees, women in economics receive only 35 percent of doctorates.
    Women have made significant progress in certain STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) fields traditionally dominated by men. But economics is not one of them. Startlingly, evidence suggests little progress in bringing women into economics since 2000.
    Those advocating for gender equality presume that women economists need to be included when research is being conducted and when policy is being debated because they bring a different perspective than men. Women economists, for example, are more likely to favor government intervention over market solutions. Male economists not only show a greater willingness to rely on markets, they are more likely to see problems from interfering with them.
    If men are the majority of full professors, younger female academics may find it harder to have their research seen as valuable. If men are the majority of editors of economics journals, it is not difficult to understand why it takes women six months longer to go through the review process for publishing in some of the top economics journals. Of course, even acknowledging the barriers to women's progress in economics, some may be convinced that the arc of history will eventually bring more women into the discipline, along with younger male economists more open to diversity. Unfortunately, there is growing reason to question that assumption. As Alice Wu's analysis of the Economics Job Market Rumors forum demonstrates, some of the biases that have contributed to the gender imbalance appear alive and well among those entering the profession.
    The governing board of the American Economic Association, at its January meeting, responded to the issues raised by the job forum. But leaders in the profession and economists throughout the world must begin to reflect upon the many factors that have produced the gender imbalance and how to address them constructively. The profession must understand that the lack of gender parity in economics is a systemic problem that will not fix itself.1.  What can we learn about the situation of women in economics? ______
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】 由题干中的the situation of women和economics定位到第一、二段。
   推理判断题。文章首段指出,与其他社会科学学科相比,女性在经济学中处于绝对的劣势。第二段进一步指出,女性在经济学中的状况没有得到什么改善。由此可见,女性在经济学这个男性主导的领域所占比重很小,故答案为C。
[参考译文] 在美国的经济学院,正式教授中仅有14%为女性。在其他社会科学学科中,女性获得博士学位的比例通常超过60%,与之形成鲜明对比的是,在经济学中女性获得博士学位的比例只占35%。
   在那些传统上由男性占主导地位的STEM(科学、技术、工程和数学)领域中,女性已经取得了显著的进步。但是在经济学中却没有。令人震惊的是,证据显示自从2000年以来,女性在经济学中几乎没有取得进步。
   那些拥护性别平等的人认为,女性经济学家应该参与到研究和政策的讨论中来,因为她们可以带来不同于男性的观点。例如:女性经济学家更倾向于支持政府干预,而不是市场解决方案。男性经济学家不仅更乐意于依赖市场,他们还更可能通过干预市场来发现问题。
   如果正式教授大多为男性的话,年轻的女性学者可能会发现她们的研究更难得到认可。如果经济学期刊的大多数编辑是男性的话,那就不难理解为什么女性要多花费6个月的时间才能完成评审过程,以在一些顶尖的经济学期刊上发表文章。当然,即使承认在经济学界有阻碍女性进步的绊脚石,但是有些人确信历史的方舟最终会将更多的女性带入这一学科,而更年轻的男性经济学家也会对多样性更加开放。不幸的是,有越来越多的理由质疑这一假设。正如爱丽丝·吴对《经济学就业市场传闻》论坛的分析所表明的,导致性别不均的一些偏见在进入该行业的人中依然盛行。
   美国经济学会董事会在1月的会议中对该就业论坛提出的问题进行了回应。但是该行业的领导以及全球的经济学家必须开始反思很多导致性别不均的因素,以及如何有效地解决它们。这一行业必须明白,经济学之所以缺少性别平等是一个体系问题,而且自身不能改正。