问答题
It is hard to predict how science is going to turn out, and if it is really good science it is impossible to predict. If the things to be found are actually new, they are by definition unknown in advance. You cannot make choices in this matter. (61) You either have science or you don't, and if you have it you are obliged to accept the surprising and disturbing pieces of information, along with the neat and promptly useful bits. The only solid piece of scientific truth about which I feel totally confident is that we are profoundly ignorant about nature. Indeed, I regard this as the major discovery of the past hundred years of biology. It is, in its way, an illuminating piece of news. (62) It would have amazed the brightest minds of the 18th century Enlightenment to be told by any of us how little we know and how bewildering the way ahead seems. (63) It is this sudden confrontation with the depth and scope of ignorance that represents the most significant contribution of the 20th century science to the human intellect. In earlier times, we either pretended to understand how things worked or ignored the problem, or simply made up stories to fill the gaps. Now that we have begun exploring in earnest, we are getting glimpses of how huge the questions are, and how far from being answered. Because of this, we are depressed. (64) It is not so bad being ignorant if you are totally ignorant; the hard thing is knowing in some detail the reality of ignorance, the worst spots and here and there the not so bad spots, but no true light at the end of the tunnel nor even any tunnels that can yet be trusted. But we are making a beginning and there ought to be some satisfaction. There are probably no questions we can think up that can't be answered, sooner or later, including even the matter of consciousness. (65) To be sure, there may well be questions we can't think up, ever, and therefore limits to the reach of human intellect, but that is another matter. Within our limits, we should be able to work our way through to all our answers if we keep at it long enough, and pay attention.
【答案解析】[解析] 句子框架是You either have science or you don't,and…you are obliged to accept the…pieces of information…。and连接两个并列句。前面分句补充完整为you either have science or you don't have science;其中either…or…结构译成“要么…,要么…”。后面分句中有if引导的条件状语从句,此从句中的it代指前面提到的science。bit原意为“(二进制)位;比特”,此处引申为“数据传输”。
【答案解析】[解析] 句子框架是It would have amazed the brightest minds…to be told…how…and how…。it为形式主语,真正的主语为后面的不定式结构to be told…。此不定式的被动结构译成主动态。两个how引导的感叹句作told的宾语。minds此处译成“有才智的人”;Enlightenment此处指“启蒙运动”。
【正确答案】正是这种突然地认识到人类无知的深度和广度,才代表了20世纪科学对人类智能的最大贡献。
【答案解析】[解析] 句子框架是It is this sudden confrontation…that represents the most significant contribution…。It is…that…引导强调结构,强调主语。confrontation with原意为“与…迎面相遇或正面相对”,此处转译为“认识到”;contribution…to译成“对…的贡献”。
【答案解析】[解析] 句子框架是It is not so bad being ignorant if…;the hard thing is knowing…the reality…,but no true light…nor even any tunnels…。分号连接两个并列句。前面的分句句首it为形式主语,真正的主语为being ignorant;if引导条件状语从句。后一分句的knowing和no true light…nor even any tunnels由but连接作谓语;句尾that引导的定语从句修饰tunnels。
【答案解析】[解析] 句子框架是there may well be questions…,and therefore limits…,but that is another matter。but连接两个并列句。前面的分句为there be句型,questions和limits 并列作其宾语we can't think up为省略了关系代词that或which的定语从句修饰questions。to be sure此处译成“诚然,固然”,而不应译为“毫无疑问,当然”。